Sītā of Sindh

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.22.2020.01.03

Keywords:

Sindh, Sindhī community, Sindhī folk stories, Ūmar–Mārvī story, Sītā

Abstract

Sītā of Sindh

The aim of this paper is to show how the Sindhī community in India (Rājasthān) builds and strengthens its identity by using both traditional and modern means of transmission. The process of reinterpretation of tradition will be demonstrated by discussing the Ūmar–Mārvī story, which belongs to the repertoire of orally transmitted local Sindhī folk stories. The Ūmar–Mārvī story mainly emphasizes local patriotism and adherence to motherland. The message of the story is still valid in the 21st century. In the Surabhi, the literary magazine on Sindhī literature in the Hindī language issued periodically in Jaypur, it took the modern form of a comic book. Thus, it provides another example of a well-known fact in Indian culture, that of the old being repeated but in a new form. Despite using modern means of transmission, traditional mechanisms can still be seen. It seems that it is not enough for the Sindhī community to continue using the folk story but, moreover, it is necessary to give the story a higher rank (a recognised one) by placing it within the frames of the mainstream tradition, that is the so-called Great Tradition of the Hindu culture. This aim is achieved by making the heroine Mārvī equal to Sītā, and, thus, the Sindhī story is linked with the great epic Rāmāyaṇa. As a result, the final product is an old Sindhī folk story presented in the form of a comic book, targeted for a wider audience than the Sindhī community exclusively, entitled Sītā of Sindh (Sindh kī Sītā).

References

Asani, A. S. 2003. At the Crossroads of Indic and Iranian Civilisations. Sindhi Literary Culture. In: S. Pollock (ed.). Literary Cultures in History. Reconstructions from South Asia. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press: 612–646.

Aslām, M. 1985. Ḍholā Mārū. Islāmābād: Lok Virsā Aśait Ghar.

Bhambhāṇī, L. (ed.). 2003. Surabhi. Sindhī sāhitya. Sindhī kā utkr̥ ṣṭ sāhitya hindī mẽ. Jaypur: Suhiṇī Pablikeśan.

Devāṇī, H. 2006. Sindhī lok nāṭya paramparā. Jodhpur: Rājasthānī Saṅgīt Nāṭak Akādmī.

Goldman, R. P., et. al. (trans.) 2010. Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki. An Epic of Ancient India. Vol. VI, 2 parts. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833269

—. (trans.). 2018. Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki. An Epic of Ancient India. Vol. VII. Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Khemānī, K. P. 2003. Bhārat ke sindhī geya premākhyān. (sine loco): Alfā Kampyūṭars eṇḍ Prinṭars.

Komal, L. 1976. Folk Tales of Pakistan. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

Noble, W. A. and R. Sankhyan. 2001. Signs of the Divine. Satī Memorials and Sati Worship in Rajasthan. In: K. Schomer, et al. (eds). The Idea of Rajasthan. Explorations in Regional Identity. Vol. I. New Delhi: Manohar: 343–389.

Pattanaik, D. 2011. 7 Secrets of Vishnu. Mumbai: Westland.

Rāmsiṃh, et. al. 1995. Ḍholā Mārū rā dūhā. Rājasthānī kā ek suprasiddh prācīn lokgīt. Jodhpur: Rājasthānī Granthāgār.

Schimmel, A. 1974. A History of Indian Literature. Vol. VIII: Sindhi Literature. Part 2. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

Subhan, J. A. 2002. Sufism. Its Saints and Shrines. New Delhi: Indigo books.

Szyszko, A. 2012. The Three Jewels of the Desert. The Ḍholā-Mārū Story. A Living Narrative Tradition of Northern India. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA.

Tariq, B. 1996. Romantic Folk Tales of Pakistan. Peshawar: Idara Ilmofun Taj Printing Press.

Todd, J. 1997. Annals and Antiquities of Rajas’than or the Central and Western Rajpoot States of India. (1st published 1829 and 1832). New Delhi: Rupa and Co.

Vaudeville, C. 1962. Dhola-Maru. An Interpretation. In: Journal of the Oriental Institute. Vol. 11 (June): 316–321.

http://sindhology.org

http://www.rajsindhiacademy.com

http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_Data_Online/Language/Statement5.aspxs

Downloads

Published

2020-10-15

How to Cite

Turek, Aleksandra. 2020. “Sītā of Sindh”. Cracow Indological Studies 22 (1):55-72. https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.22.2020.01.03.