The Many Selves of an Actor

Perceptibility of Second-order Characters in the Naṭāṅkuśa and Non-dualist Theories of Cognition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.24.2022.01.06

Keywords:

Kūṭiyāṭṭam, Naṭāṅkuśa, Advaita Vedānta, Kashmiri Śaivism, pakarnnāṭṭam, Dharmarāja, Somānanda, Vedāntaparibhāṣa, Śivadṛṣṭi, sarvasarvātmakatvavāda

Abstract

This article explores artistic innovations in Kūṭiyāṭṭam theater through the lens of critique developed in the Naṭāṅkuśa—a polemical treatise composed, perhaps, in the 15th century Kerala. The focus is on the Naṭāṅkuśa’s fierce disapproval of the performance of multiple roles by an actor dressed as one and the same character—for example, switching from the role of Hanumān to that of Rāma, while still in Hanumān’s costume and make-up. The author of the Naṭāṅkuśa utilizes epistemological arguments to demonstrate the impossibility of accommodating more than one character in a single actor’s mind. Nor can a spectator have a stable cognition of the second- order characters. The fact that the author attributes to the opponent— a Kūṭiyāṭṭam performer—a non-dualist theory of cognition, suggests that the theory of Kūṭiyāṭṭam was inspired by Advaita Vedāntin and the non-dualist Śaiva epistemological presuppositions.

PlumX Metrics of this article

References

Primary sources

Mālinīślokavārttika = Abhinavagupta’s Philosophy of Revelation: Mālinīślokavārttika I, 1–399. 1998. J. Hanneder, J. (ed. and transl.). Egbert Forsten: Groningen.

NA = Naṭāṅkuśa: A Critique on Dramaturgy. 1993. K. G. Paulose (ed.). Tripunithura: Ravivarma Saṃskṛta Granthāvali: 26.

Śivadṛṣṭi = The Śivadriṣṭi of Srisomānandanātha with the Vritti by Utpaladeva. 1934. KSTS LIV. Srinagar.

TV = Pātañjalayogadarśanam Vācaspatimiśraviracita-Tattvavaiśāradī-Vijñānabhikśukṛta-Yogavārttikavibhūṣita-Vyāsabhāṣyasametam. 1971. Varanasi: Bharatiya Vidya Prakasan.

Varadāmbikā Pariṇaya Campū of Tirumalāmbā. 1970. Śāstri, S. (ed.). 1970. Chowkhamba Sanskrit Studies, 69, Varanasi: Chowkhamba Publication.

VP = Vedāntaparibhāṣa. 1991. In: B. Gupta (ed. and transl.). Perceiving in Advaita Vedānta: Epistemological Analysis and Interpretation. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press & London and Toronto: Associated University Presses.

Secondary sources

Casassas, C. 2012. Female Roles and Engagement of Women in the Classical Sanskrit Theatre “Kūṭiyāṭṭam.” A Contemporary Theatre Tradition. In: Asian Theatre Journal, 29(1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2012.0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2012.0003

Chen Kleinman, D. 2019. Disonans Harmoni: Ha-chamatkara Be-mishnato shel Abhinavagupta ( Harmonious Dissonance: The Camatkāra in the Teaching of Abhinavagupta). Unpublished MA Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Gerrow, E. 1971. A Glossary of Indian Figures of Speech. The Hague: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905250

Gopalakrishnan, S. 2018. Kutiyattam. Sahapedia.org, https://www.sahapedia.org/kutiyattam, accessed October 23, 2021.

Hanneder, J. (ed. and transl.). 1998. Abhinavagupta’s Philosophy of Revelation: Mālinīślokavārttika I: 1–399. Egbert Forsten: Groningen. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454637

Ivanov, V. P. 2016. “All in All” Principle in the Religious and Philosophical Doctrines of the Kashmir Monistic Shaivism (Princip “vse vo vsem” v religiozno-filosofskih postroeniyah kashmirsko monisticheskogo shivaizma). In: Voprosy Filosofii, 8: 222–231.

Kellner, D. 2005. Jean Baudrillard. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/baudrillard/, accessed April 11, 2022.

Larson, G. J. 2018. Classical Yoga Philosophy and the Legacy of Sāṃkhya: With Sanskrit Text and English Translation of Pātañjala Yogasūtra-s, Vyāsa Bhāṣya and Tattvavaiśāradī of Vācaspatimiśra. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

McCrea, L. 2011. Standards and Practices: Following, Making, and Breaking the Rules of Śāstra. In: Y. Bronner, W. Cox, and L. McCrea (eds). South Asian Texts in History: Critical Engagements with Sheldon Pollock. Association for Asian Studies: 229–244.

Nemec, J. 2014. The Evidence for Somānanda’s Pantheism. In: Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42: 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9212-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9212-5

Paulose, K. G. 1993. Introduction. In: K. G. Paulose (ed.). Naṭāṅkuśa: A Critique on Dramaturgy. Tripunithura: Ravivarma Saṃskṛta Granthāvali, 26: xi–xxix.

Ratié, I. 2017. Utpaladeva and Abhinavagupta on the Freedom of Consciousness. In: J. Ganeri (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy, Oxford University Press: 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199314621.013.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199314621.013.27

Reich, J. D. 2018. Bhaṭṭanāyaka and the Vedānta Influence on Sanskrit Literary Theory. In: Journal of the American Oriental Society, 138(3): 533–558. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.138.3.0533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.138.3.0533

Shulman, D. 2016. Deep Seeing: Notes on the Kūṭyaṭṭam. In: A. Chakrabarti (ed.). The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: 221–249. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219006.ch-011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219006.ch-011

Torella, R. 2002. Introduction. In: R. Torella (ed. and transl.). The Īśvarapratya-bhijñākārikā of Utpaladeva with the Author’s Vṛtti: Critical Edition and Annotated Translation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers: ix–xlv.

Wezler, A. 1987. Remarks on the Sarvasarvātmakatvavāda. In: R. R. Mukhopadhyaya et al. (eds). Philosophical Essays: Professor Anantalal Thakur Felicitation Volume. Calcutta: Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar: 166–181.

—. 1992. Paralipomena zum Sarvasarvātmakatvavāda II: On the Sarvasarvātmakatvavāda and its Relation to the Vṛkṣāyurveda. In: Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, 16(17): 287–315.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-18

How to Cite

Shevchenko, Dimitry. 2022. “The Many Selves of an Actor: Perceptibility of Second-Order Characters in the Naṭāṅkuśa and Non-Dualist Theories of Cognition”. Cracow Indological Studies 24 (1):111-30. https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.24.2022.01.06.

Funding data