Halfway or no way?

Authors

  • Zoltán Bretter University of Pécs

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.28.01

Keywords:

state, liberalism, political culture, “kádárism”, Hungary

Abstract

I am going to sketch a general picture of Hungary today. This will require to present in some detail the road on which we have arrived here: the peculiarities of the Kádár‑regime, i.e. the “goulash‑ communism” and of the Hungarian “refolution” (self‑ contradictory mixture of revolution and reform) i.e. the constitutional revolution of 1989; the features and failure of the liberal enterprise that to a large extent characterized the first 10‑20 years of the newly established democracy. I will describe the present situation in Hungary as a halfway in the learning process of a democratic political culture that already owes a lot to its established traditions: the state‑ centrism, paternalistic leadership, occasional outbursts of nationalism. The genre of this paper is properly called essay in its meaning of “attempt” at defining a concept of Hungarian political culture: “kádárism”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Zoltán Bretter, University of Pécs

    Born 1958 in Cluj, Romania. Studied at the University Babeș- Bolyai philosophy and history then at the Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest, philosophy and sociology. Ph.D. studies at Princeton University (USA, 1999). Received his philosophy Ph.D. in 2002 from the ELTE. Since 1987 working at Pécs University, currently as assistant professor, lecturing on political and social philosophy. Served as Member of Parliament from 1990 to 1998, and as city councilor in Pécs from 2002 to 2008. Was director of the Hungarian Cultural Institute in Bucharest, Romania (2008- 2012). His book on the H.L.A. Hart and Patrick Devlin debate (morals legislation) was published in 2004.

References

/2130(INI) Situation of Fundamental Rights: Standards and Practices in Hungary (pursuant to the EP resolution of 16 February 2012), 2 May 2013. Preparatory document: Working Document 4: On the Situation of Fundamental Rights: Standards and Practices in Hungary (pursuant to the EP resolution of 16 February 2012) – The Principles of Democracy and the Rule of Law, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, (5 March 2013, at <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/libe/draft‑reports.html?linkedDocument=true&ufolderComCode=LIBE&ufolderLegId=7&ufolderId=09747&urefProcYear=urefProcNum=&urefProcCode=#menuzone>).

Almond G. A., ‘Comparative Political Systems’, Journal of Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3 (1956), <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2127255>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2127255

Almond G. A., ‘Communism and Political Culture Theory’, Comparative Politics, Vol. 15, No. 2 (1983). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/421672

Almond G. A., Verba S., The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874569

Arendt H., On Revolution, New York 1965, Compass Books, C166.

Bibó I., ‘Eltorzult magyar alkat, zsákutcás magyar történelem’, in idem, Válogatott tanulmányok, eds. by I. Vida, E. Nagy, Budapest 1986.

Bibó I., ‘A kelet‑európai kisállamok nyomorúsága’, in Válogatott tanulmányok, ed. by I. Vida, E. Nagy, Vol. 2, Budapest 1986.

Bibó I., Democracy, Revolution, Self‑Determination. Selected Writings, ed. by K. Nagy, A. A. Boros‑Kazai.

Boulder–New York 1991, East European Monographs, 317, Atlantic Studies on Society in Change, 69.

Bozóki A., ‘The Crisis of Democracy in Hungary, 2012’, Deliberately Considered, (3 February 2012), at <http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2012/02/the‑crisis‑of‑democracy‑in‑hungary‑2012/>.

Bozóki A., ‘Success Stories: Lessons of Democratization in Central Europe’, Regio: Minorities, Politics, Society – English Edition, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2003).

Cohen S., ‘Privatization in Eastern Europe: The Tunnel at the End of the Light’, The American Prospect (19 December 2001).

Coleman J. S., Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge (Mass.) 1994.

Elster J., Offe C., Preuss U. K., Institutional Design in Post‑Communist Societies. Rebuilding the Ship at Sea, Cambridge 1998, Theories of Institutional Design. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628351

Ely J. H., Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv102bj77

Ferge Z., ‘A rendszerváltás nyertesei és vesztesei’, Társadalmi riport (1996).

Foley M. W., Edwards B., ‘Escape from Politics? Social Theory and the Social Capital Debate’, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 40, No. 5 (1997), <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040005002>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040005002

Galston W. A., Liberal Pluralism. The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice, Cambridge 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613579

Gough R., A Good Comrade. János Kádár, Communism and Hungary, London 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755618750

Haerpfer Ch. W., ‘Hungary – Structure and Dynamics of Democratic Consolidation’, in Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe, ed. by H.‑D. Klingeman, D. Fuchs, J. Zielonka, London 2006, Routledge Research in Comparative Politics, 15.

Havel V. [et al.], The Power of the Powerless. Citizens against the State in Central‑Eastern Europe, edited by J. Keane, Armonk 1985.

Holmes S., ‘The Scowl of Minerva’, The New Republic, (23 March 1992).

Isaac J. C., ‘The Meanings of 1989’, Social Research, Vol. 63, No. 2 (1996).

Kis J., A politika mint erkölcsi probléma, Budapest 2004.

Konrád G., Antipolitics. An Essay, trans. by R. E. Allen, San Diego 1984.

Kornai J., ‘Centralization and the Capitalist Market Economy’, Népszabadság (1 February 2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2012.00443.x

Kornai J., ‘Paying the Bill for Goulash Communism: Hungarian Development and Macro Stabilization in a Political‑Economy Perspective’, Social Research, Vol. 63, No. 4 (1996).

Kubik J., ‘Cultural Approaches’, in The Handbook of Transformation Research, ed. by R. Kollmorgen, W. Merkel, H.‑J. Wagener, Wiesbaden 2012.

Lane R., ‘Political Culture: Residual Category or General Theory’, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3 (1992). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414092025003004

Mishler W., Pollack D., ‘On Culture, Thick and Thin: Toward a Neo‑Cultural Synthesis’, in Political Culture in Post‑Communist Europe, ed. by D. Pollack [et al.], Attitudes in New Democracies, Aldershot 2003.

Mishler W., Rose R., ‘Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post‑Communist Societies’, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 59, No. 2 (1997), <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2998171>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381600053512

Pickel G., Pickel S., Politische Kultur– und Demokratieforschung. Grundbegriffe, Theorien, Methoden. Eine Einführung, Wiesbaden 2006, Lehrbuch.

Pitkin H. F., ‘Are Freedom and Liberty Twins?’, Political Theory, Vol. 16, No. 4 (1988), <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591788016004001>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591788016004001

‘Polish Dissident Adam Michnik: “We Are Bastards of Communism”’, Der Spiegel (29 July 2013), at <http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/polish‑dissident‑adam‑michnik‑on‑eastern‑europe‑after‑communism‑a‑913912.html>.

Pollack D. [et al.] eds., Political Culture in Post‑Communist Europe. Attitudes in New Democracies, Aldershot 2003.

Pop‑Eleches G., Tucker J. A., ‘Communism’s Shadow: Postcommunist Legacies, Values, and Behavior’, Comparative Politics, Vol. 43, No. 4 (2011), <http://dx.doi.org/10.5129/001041511796301588>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041511796301588

Putnam R. D., ‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital’, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 6, No. 1 (1995). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

Putnam R. D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R. Y., Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820740

Rohrschneider R., ‘Learning Democracy: Do Democratic Values Adjust to New Institutions?’, in Political Culture in Post‑Communist Europe. Attitudes in New Democracies, ed. by Pollack D. [et al.], Aldershot 2003.

Rohrschneider R., Learning Democracy. Democratic and Economic Values in Unified Germany, Oxford–New York 1999, Comparative European Politics.

Rose R., Understanding Post‑Communist Transformation. A Bottom up Approach, London–New York 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884935

Sólyom L., ‘A halálbüntetés eltörléséről’, ABH 23/1990, The Constitutional Court of Hungary 1990.

Szacki J., Liberalism after Communism, trans. by Ch. A. Kisiel, Budapest 1995.

Sztompka P., ‘Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post‑Communist Societies’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Vol. 2, No. 22 (1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1993-0201

Sztompka P., ‘The Lessons of 1989 for Sociological Theory’, in idem ed., Building Open Society and Perspectives of Sociology in East‑Central Europe, Madrid 1996.

Tocqueville A. de, L’ancien régime et la Révolution, ed. by J. P. Mayer, Paris 1967, Idées.

Tocqueville A. de, The Recollections of Alexis de Tocqueville, trans. by A. T. de Mattos, ed. by J. P. Mayer, New York 1896.

<http://www.academia.edu/2773381/Reflections_on_Democracy_in_Eastern_Europe_5_author_forum_>.

Downloads

Published

17-04-2014

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Halfway or No Way? ”. 2014. Politeja 11 (2(28): 5-30. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.28.01.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 980

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.