Claims of Contemporary Political Representation Theory

Debate on the Nature of Political Relationships

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.17

Keywords:

political representation, representative claims, political relationship

Abstract

In this work, I will attempt to address the question of what lies ahead for the theory of political representation after the “constructivist turn” that has dominated this theoretical field in recent years. In doing so, I draw upon the influential theory of Michel Saward, whose contributions have ignited inter-paradigmatic debates involving, among others, feminist authors and theorists advocating for radical democratic theory. In the article, I explore both Saward’s own arguments and the key propositions presented by his opponents. I emphasise that his assumptions not only necessitate a reformulation of the technical aspects of representation (its sources of legitimacy and principles of accountability) but also reveal the need for a theoretical reflection on the effects of new forms of “representative claims”. As I will endeavour to demonstrate, these claims lead us to a debate on the nature of “political relationships”, which I define as situations in which two or more political subjectivities mutually condition each other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Mateusz Zieliński, University of Wrocław, Poland

Doctor of Political Science, assistant professor at the Institute of Political Science at the University of Wrocław. A graduate of political science at the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Collaborator of the MiserArt centre, which combine art and life experiences of socially excluded and homeless individuals in crisis. The researcher of two grants from the Polish National Science Centre, conducting research in several countries such as Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Co-author of three monographs and several scientific articles. In his professional life, he focuses on the theory of political representation.

References

van de Bovenkamp H., Vollaard H., “Representative Claims in Practice: The Democratic Quality of Decentralised Social and Healthcare Policies in the Netherlands,” Acta Politica, vol. 53, no. 1 (2018), pp. 98-120, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0040-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0040-6
Google Scholar

Butler J., Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York–London 2015, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979
Google Scholar

Celis K., Childs S., Feminist Democratic Representation, New York 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190087722.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190087722.001.0001
Google Scholar

Cohen A., “The Inter-Est Between Us: Ontology, Epistemology, and the Failure of Political Representation,” Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 22, no. 1 (2023), pp. 46-69, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00559-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00559-4
Google Scholar

Decreus T., “Beyond Representation? A Critique of the Concept of the Referent,” Representation, vol. 49, no. 1 (2013), pp. 33-43, https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.742455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.742455
Google Scholar

Disch L., van de Sande M., Urbinati N. (eds), The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation, Edinburgh 2019, https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442602.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442602.001.0001
Google Scholar

Disch L., “The “Constructivist Turn” in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End?,” Constellations, vol. 22, no. 4 (2015), pp. 487-499, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12201
Google Scholar

Disch L., Making Constituencies: Representation as Mobilization in Mass Democracy, Chicago–London 2021, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804477.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804477.001.0001
Google Scholar

Dovi S., The Good Representative, Malden 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754948
Google Scholar

Foucault M., The History of Sexuality, New York 1978.
Google Scholar

Guasti P., Geissel B., “Saward’s Concept of the Representative Claim Revisited: An Empirical Perspective,” Politics and Governance, vol. 7, no. 3 (2019), pp. 98-111, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2103
Google Scholar

Laclau E., On Populist Reason, London–New York 2005.
Google Scholar

Laclau E., Mouffe C., Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd ed., London–New York 2001.
Google Scholar

Montanaro L., “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 74, no. 4 (2012), pp. 1094-1107, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000515
Google Scholar

Montanaro L., Who Elected Oxfam? A Democratic Defense of Self-Appointed Representatives, Cambridge–New York–Port Melbourne–New Delhi–Singapore 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297721
Google Scholar

Mouffe C., The Democratic Paradox, London–New York 2000.
Google Scholar

Phelan P., Unmarked: The Politics of Performance, London–New York 1993, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359433
Google Scholar

Phillips A., The Politics of Presence, Oxford–New York 1995, https://doi.org/10.1093/0198294158.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198294158.001.0001
Google Scholar

Pitkin H.F., The Concept of Representation, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London 1972.
Google Scholar

Rancière J., Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, Minneapolis 1999.
Google Scholar

Rey F., “The Representative System,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 26, no. 6 (2023), pp. 831-854, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1808761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1808761
Google Scholar

Saward M., “The Representative Claim,” Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 5, no. 3 (2006), pp. 297-318, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234
Google Scholar

Saward M., The Representative Claim, Oxford–New York 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001
Google Scholar

Saward M., “Shape-Shifting Representation,” American Political Science Review, vol. 108, no. 4 (2014), pp. 723-736, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000471
Google Scholar

Saward M., Making Representations: Claim, Counterclaim and the Politics of Acting for Others, Lanham 2020.
Google Scholar

Severs E., “Representation as Claims-Making: Quid Responsiveness?,” Representation, vol. 46, no. 4 (2010), pp. 411-423, https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2010.518081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2010.518081
Google Scholar

Severs E., “Substantive Representation Through a Claims-Making Lens: A Strategy for the Identification and Analysis of Substantive Claims,” Representation, vol. 48, no. 2 (2012), pp. 169-181, https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.683491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.683491
Google Scholar

Severs E., Celis K., Meier P., “Representative Claims and Beyond: A Study of Muslim Women’s Inclusion in the Flemish Headscarf Debate,” Politics, Groups and Identities, vol. 1, no. 3 (2013), pp. 433-450, https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2013.816633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2013.816633
Google Scholar

Severs E., Dovi S., “Why We Need to Return to the Ethics of Political Representation,” PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 51, no. 2 (2018), pp. 309-313, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517002414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517002414
Google Scholar

Schaap A., “Critical Exchange on Michael Saward’s The Representative Claim,” Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 11, no. 1 (2012), pp. 109-127, https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2011.42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2011.42
Google Scholar

Thomassen L., “All Claims Are Representative Claims: Response to Thomás Zicman de Barros,” Representation, vol. 58, no. 2 (2022), pp. 311-318, https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952
Google Scholar

Urbinati N., “Representative Constructivism’s Conundrum,” in L. Disch, M. van de Sande, N. Urbinati (eds), The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation, Edinburgh 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474442626-013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474442626-013
Google Scholar

de Wilde P., “The Quality of Representative Claims: Uncovering a Weakness in the Defense of the Liberal World Order,” Political Studies, vol. 68, no. 2 (2020), pp. 271-292, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719845199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719845199
Google Scholar

Williams M.S., Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalised Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation, Princeton 1998, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822782
Google Scholar

Young I.M., Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton 1990, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4g4q. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4g4q
Google Scholar

Zicman de Barros T., “‘Not All Claims Are Representative Claims’: Constructing ‘The People’ in Post-Representative Movements,” Representation, vol. 57, no. 4 (2021), pp. 515-530, https:// doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1853598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1853598
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2024-11-24

How to Cite

Zieliński, Mateusz. 2024. “Claims of Contemporary Political Representation Theory: Debate on the Nature of Political Relationships”. Politeja 21 (3(90):335-47. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.17.

Issue

Section

Political Theory