Działalność komisji Badintera w kontekście uznania państw powstałych po rozpadzie Socjalistycznej Federacyjnej Republiki Jugosławii

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.96.2.12

Keywords:

Badinter Commission, international recognition, post-Yugoslav states, independence

Abstract

ACTIVITIES OF THE BADINTER COMMISSION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RECOGNITION OF THE STATES EMERGING FROM THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SOCIALIST FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA

The Badinter Commission was initially constituted by the European Community (EC) as a body of the Conference on Yugoslavia. This was done in accordance with the Declaration of 27 August 1991, which was issued by the EC in the context of its involvement in the dissolution of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). The Arbitration Commission, established in this context, was not vested with the authority to issue legally binding decisions pertaining to Yugoslavia. The Commission was originally established as a body to assist in the resolution of constitutional disputes and the potential restructuring of the Yugoslav constitution. However, it was subsequently tasked with considering matters of international law, including self-determination and state recognition and succession, and thus became a body operating in a consultative capacity. It was envisaged that the Commission’s consultative opinions would inform the policy of the European Community member states regarding the recognition of states emerging from the process of the break-up of Yugoslavia. The objective of this article is to ascertain whether the Arbitration Commission made a tangible impact on the process of recognition by European Community member states of states that emerged from the dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). Has its role been limited to the legitimisation, under the guise of a semi-independent, semi-judicial procedure, of the political needs of the EC states with regard to the situation in Yugoslavia? It is this author’s opinion that the nature and significance of the Badinter Commission’s work cannot be considered in isolation from its political background. Consequently, the analysis and evaluation of the Commission’s activities will be situated within the broader political context of the events of 1991 and early 1992.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Rafał Woźnica, Jagiellonian University

    Doktor nauk humanistycznych w zakresie nauk o polityce, adiunkt w Katedrze Stosunków Międzynarodowych i Polityki Zagranicznej UJ. Sekretarz Komisji Środkowoeuropejskiej Polskiej Akademii Umiejętności, członek Komisji Najnowszych Dziejów Słowian oraz Komisji Bałkanistyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk. Autor monografii Bułgarska polityka wewnętrzna a proces integracji z Unią Europejską oraz licznych artykułów naukowych poświęconych problematyce bezpieczeństwa i współczesnym stosunkom międzynarodowym w regionie Bałkanów.

References

Bulletin of the European Communities 1991, no. 7/8, vol. 24, [online] https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/48527131-bb1b-42b3-b63b-4d8a1aa237da.

Caplan R., Europe and the Recognition of New States in Yugoslavia, Cambridge 2005.

Craven M., The European Community Arbitration Commission on Yugoslavia, „British Yearbook of International Law” 1995, vol. 66, no. 1.

Declaration by extraordinary EPC Ministerial Meeting on Yugoslavia, 91/349, 8 November 1991, „European Political Cooperation Documentation Bulletin” 1991, vol. 7, [online] https://aei.pitt.edu/36871/1/A2880.pdf.

Declaration on Yugoslavia, Adopted at EPC Extraordinary Ministerial Meeting, Brussels, 27 August 1991, [online] https://www.dipublico.org/100637/declaration-on-yugoslaviaextraordinary-epc-ministerial-meeting-brussels-16-december-1991/.

Declaration on Yugoslavia (Extraordinary EPC Ministerial Meeting, European Community, Brussels, 16 December 1991), Annex I, [online] https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n91/497/20/pdf/n9149720.pdf.

Declaration on the Guidelines on the Recognition of New States in Eastern Europe and in the Soviet Union (Extraordinary EPC Ministerial Meeting, Brussels, 16 December 1991), Annex II, [online] https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n91/497/20/pdf/n9149720.pdf.

Declaration on the situation Yugoslavia, adopted at the informal meeting of Ministers for Foreign Affairs, 5 October 1991 by the European Community, Annex I.

Hurd D., Averting a Balkan Tragedy, „The Times” 1991, 3 XII.

Krzak A., Armia chorwacka w systemie obrony państwa (od powstania do stanu obecnego). Zarys problemu, [w:] Bałkany Zachodnie w systemie bezpieczeństwa euroatlantyckiego, red. A. Głowacki, S.L. Szczesio, Łódź 2015.

Kučan M., Otpor Srboslaviji, Radio Free Europe, 27 II 2008, [online] https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/1045269.html.

Lučić I., Bosna i Hercegovina od prvih izbora do međunarodnog priznanja, „Časopis za suvremenu povijest” 2008, vol. 40, no. 1.

Observations on Croatian Constitutional Law (comments on the Republic of Croatia`s Constitutional Law of 4 December 1991, as Last Amended on 8 May 1992), „International Law Reports” 1993, vol. 92.

Opinion No. 1, Yugoslavia Peace Conference, Arbitration Commission, 29 November 1991, „International Law Reports” 1993, vol. 92.

Opinion No. 4, Yugoslavia Peace Conference, Arbitration Commission, 11 January 1992, „International Legal Materials” 1992, vol. 21, no. 6.

Opinion No. 5, Yugoslavia Peace Conference, Arbitration Commission, 11 January 1992, „International Legal Materials” 1992, vol. 21, no. 6.

Opinion No. 6, Yugoslavia Peace Conference, Arbitration Commission, 11 January 1992, „International Legal Materials” 1992, vol. 21, no. 6.

Opinion No. 7, Yugoslavia Peace Conference, Arbitration Commission, 11 January 1992, „International Legal Materials” 1992, vol. 21, no. 6.

Opinion No. 8, Yugoslavia Peace Conference, Arbitration Commission, 04 July 1992, „International Law Reports” 1993, no. 92.

Owen D., Balkan Odyssey, London 1995.

Pellet A., L’activité de la Commission d’arbitrage de la Conférence européenne pour la paix en Yougoslavie, „Annuaire français de droit international” 1992, vol. 38.

Pomerance M., The Badinter Commission: The Use and Misuse of the International Court of Justice’s Jurisprudence, „Michigan Journal of International Law” 1998, vol. 20, no. 1.

Resolution 713 (1991) adopted by the Security Council at its 3009th meeting, on 25 September 1991, S_RES_713(1991), [online] https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/126827?v=pdf.

Radan P., The Badinter Arbitration Commission and the Partition of Yugoslavia, „Nationalities Papers” 1997, vol. 25, no. 3.

Ragazzi M., Conference on Yugoslavia Arbitration Commission. Opinions on Questions Arising from the Dissolution of Yugoslavia, „International Legal Materials” 1992, vol. 31, no. 6.

Rich R., The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, „European Journal of International Law” 1993, vol. 4, no. 1.

Riding A., European Community Freezes Arms Sales and Aid, „The New York Times” 1991, 6 VII, [online] https://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/06/world/conflict-in-yugoslavia-european-community-freezes-arms-sales-and-aid.html.

Statement by an extraordinary EPC Ministerial Meeting concerning Yugoslavia, 91/203, 5 July 1991, „European Political Cooperation Documentation Bulletin” 1991, vol. 7, [online] http://aei.pitt.edu/36871/1/A2880.pdf.

Statement by an extraordinary EPC Ministerial Meeting concerning Yugoslavia, 91/243, 6 August 1991, „European Political Cooperation Documentation Bulletin” 1991, vol. 7, [online] http://aei.pitt.edu/36871/1/A2880.pdf.

Statement by an extraordinary EPC Ministerial Meeting concerning Yugoslavia, 91/252, 27 August 1991, „European Political Cooperation Documentation Bulletin” 1991, vol. 7, [online] http://aei.pitt.edu/36871/1/A2880.pdf.

Statement by an extraordinary EPC Ministerial Meeting concerning Yugoslavia, 91/254, 3 September 1991, „European Political Cooperation Documentation Bulletin” 1991, vol. 7, [online] http://aei.pitt.edu/36871/.

Statement on the occasion of the ceremonial opening of the Conference on Yugoslavia, 91/256, 7 September 1991, „European Political Cooperation Documentation Bulletin” 1991, vol. 7, [online] http://aei.pitt.edu/36871/1/A2880.pdf.

Statement by the Presidency of the European Community on the Recognition of Yugoslav Republics, 9/92, 15 January 1992, „European Political Cooperation Documentation Bulletin” 1992, vol. 8, [online] https://aei.pitt.edu/36872/.

Terrett S., The Dissolution of Yugoslavia and the Badinter Arbitration Commission. A Contextual Study of Peace-making efforts in the post-Cold War world, Aldershot 2000.

The Statute of the International Court of Justice, [online] https://www.icj-cij.org/statute.

Ullman R.H., Preventive recognition, [w:] The World and Yugoslavia’s Wars, red. R.H. Ullman, New York 1996.

Waldenberg M., Rozbicie Jugosławii. Jugosłowiańskie lustro międzynarodowej polityki, Warszawa 2005.

Weller M., The International Response to the Dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, „American Journal of International Law” 1992, vol. 86, no. 3.

Downloads

Published

26-06-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Działalność Komisji Badintera W kontekście Uznania państw powstałych Po Rozpadzie Socjalistycznej Federacyjnej Republiki Jugosławii”. 2025. Politeja 22 (2(96/2): 255-74. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.96.2.12.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 675

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.