The Liberal Trap

How Democratic Discourse Enables Illiberal Politics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.04

Keywords:

populism, liberal democracy, political discourse, democratic erosion, identity politics

Abstract

This article investigates the internal tensions of Liberal Democracy through the lens of discourse and political language, with particular attention to the rise of populist narratives. Far from being an external threat, populism emerges as a product of democracy itself, appropriating its symbolic repertoire – such as freedom, sovereignty, representation, and transparency – to construct a rhetoric of rupture. This dynamic generates what can be termed the ‘liberal trap’: populism legitimizes itself within democratic frameworks while simultaneously fostering illiberal practices that erode pluralism, checks and balances, and the substantive rule of law. By analyzing the semantic reconfigurations of key democratic concepts, the article highlights how language functions as both a vehicle of legitimacy and a mechanism of democratic corrosion. The study argues that populism should not be reduced to pathology or deviation but understood as a discursive transformation that reveals unresolved contradictions at the core of liberal democracy. In this way, populist discourse operates as both a symptom of systemic fragility and a catalyst of political change, illustrating how democratic ideals can be reappropriated and instrumentalized to undermine their very foundations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Alessandro Fanì, Jagiellonian University

    Holds a BA in Modern Literature from the University of Florence and a double MA degree in Public and Kultural Diplomacy (University of Siena) and International Relations and Public Diplomacy ( Jagiellonian University in Kraków). His research interests focus on political discourse analysis, populism, the crisis of liberal democracy, and the role of language in shaping political narratives. He combines theoretical approaches such as Framing Theory, Critical Discourse Analysis, and Social Constructivism with qualitative methodologies. He has experience in using MAXQDA for discourse coding and frame analysis, particularly in the context of contemporary political communication.

References

Arditi B., Politics on the Edges of Liberalism. Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748630769

Bollen K., “Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross–National Measures,”

American Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, no. 4 (1993), pp. 1207-1230, https://doi.org/10.2307/2111550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111550

Canovan M., “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies vol. 47, no. 1 (1999), pp. 2-16, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184

Fukuyama F., “The End of History?,” in R.K. Betts (ed.), Conflict after the Cold War. Arguments on Causes of War and Peace, New York 1992, pp. 16-17.

“The Global Democracy Index: How Did Countries Perform in 2024?,” The Economist, 27 February 2025, at https://www.economist.com/interactive/democracy-index-2024.

Laclau E., “Populism: What’s in a Name?,” in F. Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London 2005, pp. 32-49.

Mudde C., Kaltwasser C.R., Populism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001

Schedler A., “Anti-Political-Establishment Parties,” Party Politics, vol. 2, no. 3 (1996), pp. 291-312, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068896002003001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068896002003001

Urbinati N., “Political Theory of Populism,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 22 (2018), pp. 111-127, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753

Weyland K., “Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach,” in C.R. Kaltwasser et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford 2017, pp. 48-72, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.2

Wolkenstein F., “Populism, Liberal Democracy and the Ethics of Peoplehood,” European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 18 (2019), pp. 330-348, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116677901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116677901

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

How to Cite

“The Liberal Trap: How Democratic Discourse Enables Illiberal Politics”. 2026. Politeja 23 (2(102): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.04.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1089

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.