The Liberal Trap
How Democratic Discourse Enables Illiberal Politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.04Keywords:
populism, liberal democracy, political discourse, democratic erosion, identity politicsAbstract
This article investigates the internal tensions of Liberal Democracy through the lens of discourse and political language, with particular attention to the rise of populist narratives. Far from being an external threat, populism emerges as a product of democracy itself, appropriating its symbolic repertoire – such as freedom, sovereignty, representation, and transparency – to construct a rhetoric of rupture. This dynamic generates what can be termed the ‘liberal trap’: populism legitimizes itself within democratic frameworks while simultaneously fostering illiberal practices that erode pluralism, checks and balances, and the substantive rule of law. By analyzing the semantic reconfigurations of key democratic concepts, the article highlights how language functions as both a vehicle of legitimacy and a mechanism of democratic corrosion. The study argues that populism should not be reduced to pathology or deviation but understood as a discursive transformation that reveals unresolved contradictions at the core of liberal democracy. In this way, populist discourse operates as both a symptom of systemic fragility and a catalyst of political change, illustrating how democratic ideals can be reappropriated and instrumentalized to undermine their very foundations.
Downloads
References
Arditi B., Politics on the Edges of Liberalism. Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748630769
View in Google Scholar
Bollen K., “Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross–National Measures,”
View in Google Scholar
American Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, no. 4 (1993), pp. 1207-1230, https://doi.org/10.2307/2111550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111550
View in Google Scholar
Canovan M., “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies vol. 47, no. 1 (1999), pp. 2-16, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
View in Google Scholar
Fukuyama F., “The End of History?,” in R.K. Betts (ed.), Conflict after the Cold War. Arguments on Causes of War and Peace, New York 1992, pp. 16-17.
View in Google Scholar
“The Global Democracy Index: How Did Countries Perform in 2024?,” The Economist, 27 February 2025, at https://www.economist.com/interactive/democracy-index-2024.
View in Google Scholar
Laclau E., “Populism: What’s in a Name?,” in F. Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London 2005, pp. 32-49.
View in Google Scholar
Mudde C., Kaltwasser C.R., Populism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
View in Google Scholar
Schedler A., “Anti-Political-Establishment Parties,” Party Politics, vol. 2, no. 3 (1996), pp. 291-312, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068896002003001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068896002003001
View in Google Scholar
Urbinati N., “Political Theory of Populism,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 22 (2018), pp. 111-127, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753
View in Google Scholar
Weyland K., “Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach,” in C.R. Kaltwasser et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford 2017, pp. 48-72, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.2
View in Google Scholar
Wolkenstein F., “Populism, Liberal Democracy and the Ethics of Peoplehood,” European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 18 (2019), pp. 330-348, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116677901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116677901
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
