Language, Populism, and Political Discourse in Contemporary Europe
The Dutch Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.08Keywords:
populism, political discourse, Netherlands, PVV, critical discourse analysis (CDA), corpus linguisticsAbstract
This paper examines how populism operates through language in contemporary Europe, using the Netherlands as a revealing case and focusing on the Dutch Party for Freedom (PVV). We treat populism primarily as a discursive phenomenon: a political practice enacted through lexical choices, symbolic boundarymaking, and recurring oppositions between ‘the people’ and ‘the elites’, while drawing on ideational, strategic, and performative perspectives as interpretive cross-checks. Methodologically, the study combines Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with Corpus Linguistics (CL): a dedicated corpus of PVV electoral texts is analyzed in Sketch Engine to identify statistically salient keywords (via frequency and keyness), which are then interpreted through close, contextsensitive CDA. The findings show that PVV discourse is organized around a compact set of lexical anchors (e.g., asylum restriction, border control, regulatory skepticism), which function as condensed ideological signals enabling blame-shifting, moralization, and the naturalization of exclusion. By mapping these mechanisms, the paper offers a replicable framework for studying how populist rhetoric gains coherence, resonance, and political force in an increasingly mediated and algorithmically shaped public sphere.
Downloads
References
Baker P., Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis, London.
Banaś M., “Shades of Populism: Anti-Migrant Rhetoric in Political Discourse in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Sweden, 2020-2024,” Politeja, vol. 22, no. 3 (97) (2025), pp. 229-251, https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.97.11
Demandt E., The Rise of Populism. A Case Study of the Dutch Populist Party PVV, Bachelor’s thesis, Leiden University, 2024, at https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3764419.
van Dijk T.A., “Ideology and Discourse Analysis,” Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 11, no. 2 (2006), pp. 115-140, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908.
van Dijk T.A., “Politics, Ideology, and Discourse,” in R. Wodak (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Oxford 2006, pp. 728-740.
Fairclough N., Language and Power, London 1989.
Fairclough N., Wodak R., “Critical Discourse Analysis,” in T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2, London 1997, pp. 258-284.
Hameleers M., Bos L., de Vreese C., “Framing Blame. Toward a Better Understanding of the Effects of Populist Communication on Populist Party Preferences,” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, vol. 28, no. 3 (2018), pp. 380-398, https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1407326
Hartog E., Cokelaere H., Verhelst K., Haeck P., “Dutch Election 2025: Winners and Losers – Rob Jetten, Geert Wilders, Frans Timmermans,” Politico, 30 October 2025, at https://www.politico.eu/article/dutch-election-2025-winners-losers-rob-jetten-geert-wilders-frans-timmermans/.
de Jonge L., Rooduijn M., Zaslove A., “The Evolution of Populism in Dutch Politics,” in S. de Lange, T. Louwerse, P. ’t Hart, C. van Ham (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Dutch Politics, Oxford 2025, pp. 368-384.
de Jonge L., Voerman G., “Fortuyn versus Wilders versus Baudet: The Evolution of Populist Radical Right Party Organization in the Netherlands,” European Political Science Review, vol. 17, no. 4 (2025), pp. 674-690, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773925000049.
Kranert M. (Ed.), Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines. The Return of Populists and the People, Cham 2020.
Lamour Ch., “A Radical-Right Populist Definition of Cross-National Regionalism in Europe.
Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale beyond State Borders,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 46, no. 1 (2022), pp. 8-25, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13052
van Leeuwen T., “Critical Discourse Analysis,” in R. Wodak (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford 2006, pp. 290-294.
van Leeuwen T., “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication,” Discourse & Communication, vol. 1, no. 1 (2007), pp. 91-112, https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986.
Leezenberg M., “Discursive violence and responsibility: Notes on the pragmatics of Dutch populism,” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 3, no. 1 (2015), pp. 200-228, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.09lee.
Moffitt B., The Global Rise of Populism. Performance, Political Style, and Representation, Stanford 2016.
Nagtegaal P., Othering Narratives in Dutch Populism. A Longitudinal Analysis of PVV and SP, Master’s thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2024, at https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/75411/eobs_114425.pdf
Reisigl M., Wodak R., Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism, London 2001.
Scott M., Tribble C., Textual Patterns. Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education, Amsterdam 2006.
Verbeek B., Zaslove A., “Waking the Sleeping Populist Giant. The 2024 European Elections and Populism in the Netherlands,” in G. Ivaldi, E. Zankina (eds), 2024 EP Elections under the Shadow of Rising Populism, 22 October 2024, https://doi.org/10.55271/rp0086.
Wodak R., Language, Power and Ideology. Studies in Political Discourse, Amsterdam 1989.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
