The Challenges of Technological Development after 2020 and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy in Bulgaria

Authors

  • Desislava Damyanova Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.14

Keywords:

crisis of liberal democracy, post-democracy, meritocracy, crisis of representation, rise of populism

Abstract

The article explores the interplay between technological change, rise of populism, post-democracy, and the challenges faced by the liberal state. It argues that while meritocracy might offer equality of opportunity, it often exacerbates social inequalities because it legitimates elitism and empowers oligarchs. The crisis of liberal democracy comes from the erosion of trust in institutions and the concentration of enormous power among elites. Post-democracy, characterized by technocratic governance and reduced public engagement, undermines democratic ideals. This crisis in Bulgaria heightens the country’s vulnerability to corruption, Russian hybrid influence, and geopolitical risks at the EU’s external border. These developments are particularly problematic as Bulgaria has recently joined the Schengen area, creating an awkward situation for both the EU and the country itself. The text advocates to preserve democratic values by reviving the social commitment and ensuring a balance between economic growth and public interest. Authors like Zygmunt Bauman and Yuval Noah Harari call for rethinking democratic practices to protect human agency, address inequality and ensure broader societal participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Desislava Damyanova, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"

    A Chief Assist. Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy at Sofia University ‘St. Kliment Ochridsky’. Her research interests focus on Eastern Philosophy, Cross-cultural dialogue, Inter-religious studies, and contemporary socioanalysis. She holds a PhD degree in Eastern philosophy (Chinese Daoism) and is organizer of the 14th International Conference on Daoist studies 2021. She is a member of SACP – Society of Asian and Comparative Philosophy, Bulgarian Haiku Union, etc. She was engaged in a series of projects and initiatives serving to enhance intercultural dialogue, international cooperation and fostering civil society.

References

Bauman Z., Retrotopia, Cambridge 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.22

Calhoun C., Gaonkar D.P., Taylor Ch., Degenerations of Democracy, Cambridge–London 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674276024

Crouch C., Post-Democracy, Cambridge 2004.

Filipova R., Stefanov R., “Democracy in Bulgaria – Still Fragile After Three Decades of Transition,” Center for the Study of Democracy, at https://www.globsec.org/sites/default/files/

2020-12/Voices-of-Central-and-Eastern-Europe-Country-report-Bulgaria-in-Bulgarianlanguage.pdf.

Harari Y.N., “Why Technology Favors Tyranny,” The Atlantic, October 2018, at https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/yuval-noah-harari-technology-tyranny/568330/.

Smilova R., Meritocracy, Post-Democracy and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy, at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361445376_Meritokracia_post-demokracia_i_krizata_na_liberalnata_demokracia_Meritocracy_Post-Democracy_and_the_Crisis_of_Liberal_Democracy_httpsseminar-bgeuspisanie-seminar-bgbroy22item624-meritokracia-postdemok.

Terziyski К., “The Two Bulgarias,” Novinar, 26 March 2012, at https://www.vesti.bg/bulgaria/medii/kalin-terzijski-dvete-bylgarii-4677711.

Zneprolski B., “To Avoid Losing Peace and Itself, Liberalism Must Revive the Welfare State,” Mediapool, 7 December 2024, at https://www.mediapool.bg/za-da-ne-zagubi-mira-i-sebe-si-liberalizmat-tryabva-da-vazrodi-sotsialnata-darzhava-news365619.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawGwp9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHdw-IaNdzTDNiLUNaEdtNyCTc5z_KFy4ObOYiwuZOTJaVRVZIFmnkLMBsQ_aem_mfWwdWVNg5rbc5c-Ll7qPg.

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

How to Cite

“The Challenges of Technological Development After 2020 and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy in Bulgaria”. 2026. Politeja 23 (2(102): 255-66. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.14.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 429

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.