Artificial Authority: From Machine Minds to Political Alignments
An Experimental Analysis of Democratic and Autocratic Biases in Large-Language Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.19Keywords:
artificial intelligence, large-language models, bias, democracy, autocracyAbstract
Political beliefs vary significantly across different countries, reflecting distinct historical, cultural, and institutional contexts. These ideologies, ranging from liberal democracies to rigid autocracies, influence human societies, as well as the digital systems that are constructed within those societies. The advent of generative artificial intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), introduces new agents in the political space-agents trained on massive corpora that replicate and proliferate socio-political assumptions. This paper analyzes whether LLMs display propensities consistent with democratic or autocratic worldviews. We validate this insight through experimental tests in which we experiment with the leading LLMs developed across disparate political contexts, using several existing psychometric and political orientation measures. The analysis is based on both numerical scoring and qualitative analysis of the models’ responses. Findings indicate high model-to-model variability and a strong association with the political culture of the country in which the model was developed. These findings highlight the need for more detailed examination of the sociopolitical dimensions embedded within AI systems.
Downloads
References
Adorno T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D., Sanford N., The Authoritarian Personality, New York 1950.
Almond G.A., Verba S., The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton 1963.
Altemeyer B., The Authoritarian Specter, Cambridge 1996.
Altemeyer B., Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Winnipeg 1981.
Arab Youth Survey, Charting a New Course. The 14th Annual ASDA’A BCW Arab Youth Survey, Dubai 2022.
Boelaert J., Coavoux S., Ollion É. et al., “Machine Bias. How Do Generative Language Models Answer Opinion Polls?,” Sociological Methods & Research, vol. 54, no. 3 (2025), pp. 1156-1196, https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251330582.
Carter E.B., Chen L., Jia R., Xu Y., “Do Chinese Citizens Conceal Opposition to the CCP in Surveys? Evidence from Two Experiments,” The China Quarterly, vol. 259 (2024), pp. 804-813, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023001819.
Chaffer T.J., von Goins II Ch., Cotlage D. et al., “Decentralized Governance of AI Agents,” arXiv, 24 December 2024, at https://arxiv.org/html/2412.17114v3.
Dahl R.A., Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition, New Haven 1971.
Duckitt J., Sibley Ch.G., “Personality, Ideology, Prejudice, and Politics. A Dual-Process Motivational Model,” Journal of Personality, vol. 78, no. 6 (2010), pp. 1861-1894, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x.
Funke F., “The Dimensionality of Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Lessons from the Dilemma between Theory and Measurement,” Political Psychology, vol. 26, no. 2 (2005), pp. 195-218, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792612.
Habermas J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg, Cambridge 1996.
Hakimov R., Rohner D., Boboshin F., Chatbots’ Soft Power: Generative Artificial Intelligence Promotes Different Political Values Across Countries, 11 August 2025, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5386746.
Hartmann J., Schwenzow J., Witte M., The Political Ideology of Conversational AI. Converging Evidence on ChatGPT’s Pro-Environmental, Left-Libertarian Orientation, 1 January 2023, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4316084.
Helwe Ch., Balalau O., Ceolin D., “Navigating the Political Compass: Evaluating Multilingual LLMs across Languages and Nationalities,” in W. Che, J. Nabende, E. Shutova et al. (eds), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL 2025”, Vienna 2025, pp. 17179-17204.
Ho A.K. et al., “The Nature of Social Dominance Orientation: Theorizing and Measuring Preferences for Intergroup Inequality Using the New SDO₇ Scale,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 109, no. 6 (2015), pp. 1003-1028, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033.
Inglehart R., “How Solid Is Mass Support for Democracy – And How Can We Measure It?,” PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 36, no. 1 (2003), pp. 51-57, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503001689.
Lasser J., Poechhacker N., “Designing Social Media Content Recommendation Algorithms for Societal Good,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1548, no. 1 (2025), pp. 20-28, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15359.
Latour B., Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford 2005.
Liu Z., “Cultural Bias in Large Language Models. A Comprehensive Analysis and Mitigation Strategies,” Journal of Transcultural Communication, vol. 3, no. 2 (2024), pp. 224-244, https://doi.org/10.1515/jtc-2023-0019.
Masoud R., Liu Z., Ferianc M. et al., “Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models. An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions,” in O. Rambow, L. Wanner, M. Apidianaki (eds), Proceedings-International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi 2025, pp. 8474-8503.
Motoki F., Neto V.P., Rodrigues V., “More Human than Human. Measuring ChatGPT Political Bias,” Public Choice, vol. 198 (2024), pp. 3-23, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01097-2.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, AI Risk Management Framework, https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework.
Norris P., Democratic Deficit. Critical Citizens Revisited, Cambridge 2011.
Ober J., Demopolis. Democracy before Liberalism in Theory and Practice, Cambridge 2017.
Pereira M.F., Hernández E., Landwehr C., “Understandings and Evaluations of Democracy,” ESS Topline Results Series, no. 13 (2023), at https://europeansocialsurvey.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/TL013_Democracy-English.pdf.
Pickering A., The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, Chicago 1995.
Potter Y., Seungwon L., Hyunwoo K., Yejin Ch., “Hidden Persuaders: LLMs’ Political Leaning and Their Influence on Voters,” in Y. Al-Onaizan, M. Bansal, Y.N. Chen, Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Stroudsburg 2024, pp. 4244-4275.
Poushter J., Smerkovich M., Fagan M. et al., “Free Expression Seen as Important Globally, but Not Everyone Thinks Their Country Has Press, Speech and Internet Freedoms,” Pew Research Center, 24 April 2025, at https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/04/pg_2025.04.24_free-speech_report.pdf.
Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F., “Social Dominance Orientation. A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 67, no. 4 (1994), pp. 741-763, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
Rozado D., “The Political Biases of ChatGPT,” Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3 (2023), p. 148, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030148.
Sidanius J., Pratto F., Social Dominance. An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression, Cambridge 1999.
Suchman L.A. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed., Cambridge 2006.
Sukiennik N., Gao C., Xu F., Li Y., An Evaluation of Cultural Value Alignment in LLM, arXiv, 11 April 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08863.
Wike R., Silver L., Castillo A., “Many Across the Globe Are Dissatisfied with How Democarcy Is Working,”Pew Research Center, 29 April 2019, at https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/Pew-Research-Center_Global-Views-of-Democracy-Report_2019-04-29_Updated-2019-04-30.pdf.
Wike R., Silver L., Stokes B. et al., “Globally, Broad Support for Representative and Direct Democracy,” Pew Research Center, 16 October 2017, at https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/10/Pew-Research-Center_Democracy-Report_2017.10.16.pdf.
World Values Survey, E117 – Political System: Having a Democratic Political System, 2022, at https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp.
Venaglia R., Maxwell L., “How We Conducted Our International Study on Right-Wing Authoritarianism,” Morning Consult, 28 June 2021, at https://pro.morningconsult.com/articles/right-wing-authoritarianism-international-study-methodology.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
