Experiencing Freedom and Responsibility in the Educational Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.75.17Keywords:
Freedom, responsibility, self-realization, meeting, anxiety, educationAbstract
In what follows I discuss the problem of constructing individual identity through experiencing freedom and responsibility. Self-determination and self-realization are important elements that complement human identity. On the way to selfrealization, however, fear and anxiety occur due to permanent and global transformations of the cultural, social and political environment. It evokes a reluctance to make decisions, to take the risk of being oneself, the risk that comes in conjunction with meeting another person. Fear affects the perception of oneself and others. Thus, it is necessary to look at this phenomenon through the prism of experiencing one’s own freedom and responsibility for oneself and others, and to try to inculcate in a young person the desire to overcome this feeling of fear and anxiety often experienced in the modern world. The aim of philosophical pedagogy is to awaken in a person the desire to be oneself despite these feelings. It is a very difficult but essential challenge. Therefore, based on Tischner’s and Bollnow’s philosophy of encountering the other, I examine the significance of the impact of openness towards oneself and others in the upbringing process.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Augustyn, Wyznania, Warszawa 1983.
Google Scholar
Bollnow O.F., Existenzphilosophie und Pädagogik, Stuttgart 1968.
Google Scholar
Dostojewski F., Bracia Karamazow, Kraków 2009.
Google Scholar
Gadamer H.-G., Prawda i metoda. Zarys hermeneutyki filozoficznej, transl. B. Baran, Kraków 1993.
Google Scholar
Heidegger M., Fenomenologia życia religijnego, transl. G. Sowinski, Kraków 2002.
Google Scholar
Heidegger M., Phänomenologie der Anschauung und des Ausdrucks, Frankfurt am Main 1993.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., Książeczka o człowieku, Kraków 1999.
Google Scholar
Jadacki J.J., „Odpowiedzialność i istnienie świata”, Studia Filozoficzne, no. 5 (1973), pp. 245-257.
Google Scholar
Kant I., Kritik der Urteilskraft, Hamburg 2001.
Google Scholar
Kant I., Krytyka czystego rozumu, transl. R. Ingarden, Kęty 2001.
Google Scholar
Kant I., Zum ewigen Frieden, Stuttgart 1984.
Google Scholar
Kierkegaard S., Pojęcie lęku, transl. A. Szwed, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar
Levinas E., Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, Pittsburg 2009.
Google Scholar
Levinas E., Totality and Infinity, Pittsburg 1996.
Google Scholar
Rebes M., Między respondere i imputatio. Martina Heideggera i Józefa Tischnera hermeneutyka odpowiedzialności w horyzoncie ontologii, agatologii i aksjologii, part 1, Kraków [2014].
Google Scholar
Rotten E., “Erziehung als Begegnung“, Pädagogische Blätter, vol. 6, no. 19/20 (1955).
Google Scholar
Scheler M., Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik, Bern–München 1966.
Google Scholar
Spangler E., Kultur und Erziehung, Gesammelte pädagogische Aufsätze, Leipzig 1923.
Google Scholar
Stróżewski W., „Nad ‘Książeczką o człowieku’”, Studia Filozoficzne, no. 9 (1993), pp. 123-126.
Google Scholar
Tischner J., Filozofia dramatu, Paris 1990.
Google Scholar
Tischner J., Myślenie według wartości, Kraków 1993.
Google Scholar
Tischner J., Spór o istnienie człowieka, Kraków 1998.
Google Scholar
Tischner J., The Spirit of Solidarity, San Francisco 1984.
Google Scholar
Tischner J., Zarys filozofii człowieka dla duszpasterzy i artystów, Kraków 1991.
Google Scholar
Wojtyla K., Person and Community: Selected Essays, New York 1993.
Google Scholar
Wojtyła K., “The Acting Person”, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 10 (1979).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9418-8
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.