Elocutio in Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria, Book Eight
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.17.2014.17.12Keywords:
elocutio, deterioration of speech, clarity of speech, rhetorical ornaments, neologisms, erroneous use of language, sententia, tropesAbstract
Elocutio in Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria, Book Eight
The rhetorical art is the skill of speaking well, it is useful, it is an art, and it has virtus. The Greek concept of fra;sivj is rendered by Roman authors as elocutio, i.e. style. Quintilian believes clarity of speech is the basic element of good style. Words should be apt, order – direct, conclusion – not too distant, and everything should have adequate proportions. Words should be selected depending on the context. The words used in a metaphorical sense gain appreciation only in a specific context. Ability to present facts clearly and vividly is a great asset. Even the natural and unsophisticated simplicity, which the Greeks call afeleia, contains some decorativeness, while punctilious scrupulosity in adhering to grammatical correctness gives the impression of sophistication and subtlety. The real power of the speaker lies in his ability to strengthen or weaken the power of words. The last, sixth chapter of book eight contains Quintilian’s thoughts on the rhetorical tropes. A trope (tro;povj) is an artistic (cum virtute) change of a word or an expression from the original and proper one to another.
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Adamietz J., 1986, ‘Quintilian’s Institutio Oratoria’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II 32, 4, pp. 2226‑2271.
Ahl F., 1984, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, The American Journal of Philology, 105, pp. 174‑208.
Brinton A., 1983, ‘Quintilian, Plato and the vir bonus’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 16, pp. 167‑184.
Chico‑Rico F., 2003, ‘Some (semiotic) aspects of elocutio in Quintilian’, [in:] O. Tellegen‑Couperus (ed.), Quintilian and the law. The art of persuasion in law and politics, Leuven, pp. 201‑211.
Cousin J., 1967, Études sur Quintilien, vol. 1‑2, Amsterdam.
Cranz F. E., 1995, ‘Quintilian as ancient thinker’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 13, pp. 219‑230.
Dominik W. (ed.), 1997, Roman eloquence. Rhetoric in society and literature, London – New York.
Dominik W., Hall J. (eds.), 2010, A companion to Roman rhetoric, Malden.
Fantham E., 1978, ‘Imitation and decline: rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology, 73, pp. 102‑116.
Fantham E., 1995, ‘The concept of nature and human nature in Quintilian’s psychology and theory of instruction’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 13, pp. 125‑136.
Fuhrmann M., 1984, Die Antike Rhetorik. Eine Einführung, München.
Glare P. G. W. (ed.), 1990, Oxford Latin dictionary, Oxford.
Habinek T. N., 2004, Ancient rhetoric and oratory, Malden.
Innes D., 1988, ‘Cicero on Tropes’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 6, pp. 307‑325.
de Jong I. J. F., Sullivan J. P. (eds.), 1994, Modern critical theory and classical literature, Leiden – New York.
Kennedy G. A., 1962, ‘An estimate of Quintilian’, The American Journal of Philology, 83, pp. 130‑146.
Logie J., 2003, ‘“I have no predecessor to guide my steps”: Quintilian and Roman authorship’, Rhetorical Review, 22, pp. 353‑373.
Odgers M. M., 1933, ‘Quintilian’s use of earlier literature’, Classical Philology, 28, pp. 182‑188.
Odgers M. M., 1935, ‘Quintilian’s rhetorical predecessors’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, 66, pp. 25‑36.
Radermacher L. 1959‑1971, M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Libri XII, pars prior libros I – VI continens, addenda et corrigenda collegit et adiecit V. Buchheit, Leipzig 1971; pars secunda libros VII – XII continens, addenda et corrigenda collegit et adiecit V. Buchheit, 1‑2 Leipzig 1959.
Russell D. A., 1967, ‘Rhetoric and criticism’, Greece & Rome (Second Series), 14, pp. 130‑144.
Solmsen F., 1941, ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, The American Journal of Philology, 62, pp. 35‑50, 169-190.
Śnieżewski S., 2014, Terminologia retoryczna w Institutio oratoria Kwintyliana, 2014, Kraków.
Walzer A. E., 2003, ‘Quintilian’s ‘vir bonus’ and the Stoic wise man’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33, pp. 25‑41.
West D., Woodman T. (eds.), 1979, Creative imitation and Latin literature, 1979, Cambridge – New York.
Woodman A. J., Powell J. G. F. (eds.), 1992, Author and audience in Latin literature, 1992, Cambridge – New York.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
