Libanus and the Death of Julian

Orations XVII and XVIII – Few Remarks on the True Emotions Behind Convention

  • Joanna Janik Jagiellonian University, Kraków
Keywords: Libanius, rhetoric, monody, funeral speech

Abstract

Two speeches composed by Libanius after the unexpected death of his emperor and friend, the Monody (XVII) and the Funeral Speech (XVIII), fulfill the requirements of the genre so perfectly that it is easy to classify them as purely conventional. Both the structure and content, not to mention the language, demonstrate the author’s literary fluency rather than originality. Yet I would like to argue that even if the concept and form of the speeches reproduce the well established pattern, my personal impression that there is something unique in these works is not completely groundless. Libanius’ friendship and respect for the late emperor, as well as the political situation after Julian’s death, make the orator’s commitment exceptional and I cannot resist the feeling that his grief and confusion are genuine. I would like to focus on the passages referring directly to the circumstances of the emperor’s death, since Libanius’ approach to the explanation of this tragic event seems crucial for my argument.

References

Bradbury S., 2006, ‘Reflections on Friendship in Libanius’ Letters’, Topoi. Orient-Occident. Supplement 7, pp. 243–261.

Cribiore R., 2013, Libanius the Sophist. Rhetoric, Reality, and Religion in the Fourth Century, Ithaca–London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801452079.001.0001

Henry M., 1985, ‘Le Témoignage de Libanius et les Phénomènes Sismiques du IV e Siècle de Notre Ère: Essai d’Interprétation’, Phoenix 39(1), pp. 36–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1088869

Jacques F., Bousquet B., 1984, ‘Le raz de marée du 21 juillet 365. Du cataclysme local à la catastrophe cosmique’, Antiquité Tardive 96, pp. 423–461, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.3406/mefr.1984.1412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/mefr.1984.1412

Nesselrath H.-G., 2014, ‘Libanius and the literary tradition’, [in:] Libanius. A Critical Introduction, L. Van Hoof (ed.), Cambridge, pp. 241–267, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012089.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012089.016

Nixon C.E.V., Rodgers Saylor B., 1994, In Praise of Later Roman Emperors. The Panegyrici Latini. Introduction, Translation, and Historical Commentary with the Latin Text, Berkeley–Los Angeles–Oxford.

Nuffelen van P., 2006, ‘Earthquakes in A.D. 363–368 and the Date of Libanius, Oratio 18’, The Classical Quarterly. New Series 56(2), pp. 657–661, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838806000784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838806000784

Russel D.A., Wilson N.G., 1981, Menander Rhetor. A Commentary, Oxford.

Szopa A., 2015, ‘Wódz doskonały w świetle łacińskich panegiryków późnoantycznych’, Vox Patrum 35, pp. 307–329.

Watts E., 2014, ‘The historical context: the rhetoric of suffering in Libanius Monodies, Letters and Autobiography’, [in:] Libanius. A Critical Introduction, L. Van Hoof (ed.), Cambridge, pp. 39–58, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012089.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012089.005

Wiemer H.-U., 1995, Libanios und Julian. Studien zum Verhältnis von Rhetorik und Politik in vierten Jahrhundert n. Ch., München.

Wiemer H.-U., 2014, ‘Emperors and empire in Libanius’, [in:] Libanius. A Critical Introduction, L. Van Hoof (ed.), Cambridge, pp. 187–219, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012089.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012089.014

Published
2018-12-28
Section
Articles