Kāvya’s Repeat Performances

Intersections of Aesthetics, yoga-parikarma-bhāvanā, and the Logic of Medium-Specificity in Daśarūpaka’s Discussion of śāntarasa





rasa, śāntarasa, parikarma, bhāvanā, genre, medium, Daśarūpaka, Abhinavagupta


Kāvya’s Repeat Performances. Intersections of Aesthetics, yoga-parikarma-bhāvanā, and the Logic of Medium-Specificity in Daśarūpaka’s Discussion of śāntarasa

Largely left underexplored in rasa studies has been an implication made in the middle of the tenth century that śāntarasa eludes theorization with respect to the theater (nāṭya) but may function within an exclusive theory of poetry (kāvya). A discussion in the Daśarūpaka (“The Ten Dramatic Forms”) and its commentary cryptically imply in the fourth chapter of that work that if śāntarasa is viable at all as a genre of rasa theory, it is medium-specific to kāvya and not possible in nāṭya. Though śāntarasa is a dubious category for theater theory and pragmatics, they seem to argue, it may be acceptable in poetry through a synergy of two theoretical schemas: poetics and Yoga psychology. Reviewing these arguments opens up a larger conversation about the significance of medium to rasa theory and the inherent limitations for conceiving unified theories of art.

PlumX Metrics of this article


Primary Sources

Apte, H. N. (ed.). 1904. Pātañjala-Yogasūtrāṇi (with three commentaries). Pune: Ananda Ashram Press.

Dvarikadasa, S. (ed.). 1977. Visuddhimagga. Vārāṇ asī: Bauddhabhāratī Press.

Sastry, P. (ed.). 1940. Dhvanyāloka of Ānandavardhana with the Locana of Abhinavagupta and the subcommentary of Rāmaṣāraka. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.

Shastri, M. (ed.). 1971. Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni with the Abhinavabhāratī. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University.

Venkatacharya, T. (ed.). 1947. Daśarūpaka of Dhanaṃjaya, with the Avaloka of Dhanika, and the subcommentary of Bhaṭṭa Nṛsiṃha. Madras: Adyar Library and Research Centre.

Secondary Sources

Bapat, P. V. 1937. Vimuttimagga and Visuddhimagga: A Comparative Study. Poona: Ferguson College.

Barlingay, S. S. 1981. What Did Bharata Mean by Rasa? In: Indian Philosophical Quarterly, 8(4): 433–456.

Bhattacarya, K. 1972. Śāntarasa et Advaita. In: Journal Asiatique, 160: 89–105.

Bhattacharya, S. P. 1976. Śānta Rasa and Its Scope in Literature. Calcutta: Sanskrit College.

Clark, T. J. 2008. The Sight of Death: An Experiment in Art Writing. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Cox, W. 2013. From Source-criticism to Intellectual History in the Poetics of the Medieval Tamil Country. In: W. Cox and V. Vergiani (eds). Bilingual Discourse and Cross-Cultural Fertilisation: Sanskrit and Tamil in Medieval India. Pondicherry: Institut français de Pondichéry / École française d’Extrême-Orient. Sections 1-59 (open online edition). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ifp.2807

David, H. 2016. Time, Action and Narration. On Some Exegetical Sources of Abhinavagupta’s Aesthetic Theory. In: Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44(1): 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9256-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9256-1

Gerow, E. et al. 1972. On Śānta Rasa in Sanskrit Poetics. In: Journal of the American Oriental Society, 92(1): 80–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/599651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/599651

Gerow, E. 1994. Abhinavagupta’s Aesthetics as a Speculative Paradigm. In: Journal of the American Oriental Society, 114(2): 186–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/605829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/605829

Janaki, S. S. (ed.). 1965. Introduction. Alaṅkārasarvasva of Rājānaka Ruyyaka, with the commentary of Vidyācakravartin. Delhi: Meharchand Lachhmandas.

Leavitt, G. 2011. The Social in Kashmiri Aesthetics: Suggesting and Speciously Savoring Rasa in Ānandavardhana and Abhinavagupta. In: W. Cox, Y. Bronner and J. McCrea (eds). South Asian Texts in History. Critical Engagements with Sheldon Pollock. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Asian Studies: 267–292.

Masson, J. L. and M. V. Patwardhan 1969. Śāntarasa and Abhinavagupta’s Philosophy of Aesthetics. Poona: BORI. McCrea, L. 2013. Śāntarasa in the Rājataraṅginī: History, Epic, and Moral Decay. In: Indian Economic and Social History Review, 50(2): 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019464613487099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019464613487099

Ollett, A. 2013. “What is Bhāvanā?” In: Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(3): 221–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9181-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9181-8

Ollett, A. 2016. Ritual Texts and Literary Texts in Abhinavagupta’s Aesthetics: Notes on the Beginning of the ‘Critical Reconstruction.’ In: Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44(3): 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9277-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9277-4

Ollett, A. 2020. Rasa as Sentence Meaning. In: A. Graheli (ed.). The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Philosophy of Language. London: Bloomsbury: 371–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350049154.0032

Patel, D. M. 2013. Mettābhāvanā in Traditional and Popular Buddhist Contexts. In: Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East, 23(4): 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2013.831532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2013.831532

Pollock, S. 2001. The Social Aesthetic and Sanskrit Literary Theory. In: Journal of Indian Philosophy, 29(1): 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017565123467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017565123467

Pollock, S. 2010. What Was Bhaṭṭa Nāyaka Saying? In: S. Pollock (ed.). Epic and Argument in Sanskrit Literary History: Essays in Honor of Robert P. Goldman. Delhi: Manohar: 143–184.

Pollock, S. 2012. From Rasa Seen to Rasa Heard. In: S. D’Intino, C. Guenzi (eds). Aux abords de la clairière: Études indiennes et comparées en l’honneur de Charles Malamoud. Turnhout: Brepols: 189–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.BEHE-EB.4.00326

Pollock, S. 2016. A Rasa Reader. Classical Indian Aesthetic. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/poll17390

Raghavan, V. 1940. The Number of Rasas. Madras: Adyar Library.

Reich, J. D. 2018. Bhaṭṭanāyaka and the Vedānta Influence on Sanskrit Literary Theory. In: Journal of the American Oriental Society, 138(3): 533–557. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.138.3.0533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.138.3.0533

Shulman, D. 2012. More than Real: A History of the Imagination in South India. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674065123

Tatia, N. 1986. Jaina Meditation. Ladnun: Jain Vishva Bharati.

Tubb, G. 1985. Śāntarasa in the Mahābhārata. In: Journal of South Asian Literature, 20(1): 141–168.

Vora, P.R. 1986. Rasa Theory and the Darśanas. In: V. M. Kulkarni (ed.). Some Aspects of the Rasa Theory. Delhi: B. L. Institute of Indology: 63–69.




How to Cite

Patel, Deven M. 2020. “Kāvya’s Repeat Performances: Intersections of Aesthetics, Yoga-Parikarma-bhāvanā, and the Logic of Medium-Specificity in Daśarūpaka’s Discussion of śāntarasa”. Cracow Indological Studies 22 (2):43-62. https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.22.2020.02.03.