Cyber Pearl Harbor is Not Coming: US Politics Between War and Peace

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.79.07

Keywords:

cybersecurity, cyber Pearl Harbor, USA, cyberwar

Abstract

In 2012, the US Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta warned against an inevitable ‘cyber-Pearl Harbor’, an attack that would cause physical destruction and loss of life. Even though the darkest scenarios have not come true, his words shaped the perception of conflicts in cyberspace.1 Recently, between the cyberwar and cyberpeace, states started recognizing a grey zone area – aggressive and offensive actions below the threshold of armed aggression that enable gaining strategic advantage. The aim of the article is to describe and discuss the change in the American approach to managing conflicts in the cyberspace. The focus will be on describing the current state of the concept of the grey zone in the US strategic documents, as well as the premises for forecasting the development of the grey zone in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Dominika Dziwisz, Jagiellonian University in Krakow

PhD, is an assistant professor in the Institute of Political Science and International Relations of the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland. She holds master’s degree both in International Relations as well as Marketing and Management. She received her PhD with distinctions from the Jagiellonian University in 2014. Her PhD research was focused on cybersecurity policy in the USA. This topic, together with critical infrastructure protection and the relationship between Big Data and human rights, to this day remains in the center of her research interests.

References

Barno D., Bensahel N., “Fighting and Winning in the »Gray Zone«”, War on the Rocks, 19 May 2015, at https://warontherocks.com/2015/05/fighting-and-winning-in-the-gray-zone/.
Google Scholar

Belo D., Carment D., Grey-Zone Conflict: Implications for Conflict Management, Calgary 2019.
Google Scholar

Bilms K., “Gray is Here to Stay: Principles from The Interim National Security Strategic Guidance on Competing in The Gray Zone”, Modern War Institute, 25 March 2021, at https://mwi.usma.edu/gray-is-here-to-stay-principles-from-the-interim-national-security-strategicguidance-on-competing-in-the-gray-zone/.
Google Scholar

Blinken A.J., “Additional Military Assistance for Ukraine”, U.S. Department of State, 26 February 2022, at https://www.state.gov/additional-military-assistance-for-ukraine/.
Google Scholar

Braw E., “Biden’s Gray-Zone Gaffe Highlights a Real Dilemma”, Defense One, 20 January 2022, at https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2022/01/bidens-gray-zone-gaffe-highlightsreal-dilemma/360982/.
Google Scholar

Casey G., “Remarks at the National Press Club”, U.S. Army, 14 August 2007, at https://www.army.mil/article/4436/aug_14_2007_remarks_at_the_national_press_club.
Google Scholar

Center for International and Strategic Studies, “Gray Zone Project”, at https://www.csis.org/programs/gray-zone-project.
Google Scholar

Davis II J.S. et al., Stateless Attribution: Toward International Accountability in Cyberspace, Santa Monica, CA 2017, https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2081.
Google Scholar

Farrell H., Glaser Ch.L., “The Role of Effects, Saliencies and Norms in US Cyberwar Doctrine”, Journal of Cybersecurity, vol. 3, no. 1 (2017), pp. 7-17, https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyw015.
Google Scholar

Freedberg S.J., “Cyber Warfare in The Grey Zone: Wake Up Washington”, Breaking Defense, 9 April 2019, at https://breakingdefense.com/2019/04/cyber-warfare-in-the-greyzone-wake-up-washington/.
Google Scholar

Gannon J.A. et al., “Why Did Russia Escalate Its Gray Zone Conflict in Ukraine?”, Lawfare, 16 January 2022, at https://www.lawfareblog.com/why-did-russia-escalate-its-grayzone-conflict-ukraine.
Google Scholar

Gaoyue F., Char J., Introduction to China’s Military Operations Other Than War, Singapore 2019, at https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/PR190225_Introductionto-Chinas-Military-Operations-Other-than-War.pdf.
Google Scholar

Gerasimov V., “The Value of Science Is in the Foresight New Challenges Demand Rethinking the Forms and Methods of Carrying out Combat Operations”, Military Review, January-February 2016, at https://www.armyupress.army.mil/portals/7/military-review/archives/english/militaryreview_20160228_art008.pdf.
Google Scholar

Gordon S., Rosenbach E., “America’s Cyber-Reckoning: How to Fix a Failing Strategy”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 101, no. 1 (2022), pp. 10-20.
Google Scholar

Gould J., Pomerleau M., “Why the US Should Fight Russia, China in the »Gray Zone«”, Navy Times, 4 January 2022, at https://www.navytimes.com/information-warfare/2022/01/04/why-the-us-should-fight-russia-china-in-the-gray-zone/?contentFeatureId=f0fmoahPVC2AbfL-2-1-.
Google Scholar

Harding L. et al., “Ukraine Fighting to Stop ‘a New Iron Curtain’ after Russian Invasion”, The Guardian, 24 February 2022, at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/24/russia-attacks-ukraine-news-vladimir-putin-zelenskiy-russian-invasion.
Google Scholar

Healey J., “The Implications of Persistent (and Permanent) Engagement in Cyberspace”, Journal of Cybersecurity, vol. 5, no. 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyz008.
Google Scholar

Hoffman F.G., Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, Arlington, VA 2007.
Google Scholar

JCS, Joint Doctrine Note 1-19. Competition Continuum, Washington, DC, 3 June 2019, at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/jdn_jg/jdn1_19.pdf.
Google Scholar

Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Publication 3-0: Joint Operations, 11 August 2011, at https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=685338.
Google Scholar

Kello L., The Virtual Weapon and International Order, New Haven 2017, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1trkjd1.
Google Scholar

Kleczkowska A., “Explaining the Meaning of ‘Grey Zones’ in Public International Law Based on the Example of the Conflict in Ukraine”, Contemporary Central & East European Law, no. 1(133) (2019), pp. 75-93, https://doi.org/10.37232/cceel.2019.07.
Google Scholar

Kosseff J., “The Contours of ‘Defend Forward’ Under International Law”, 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon), Tallinn 2019, at https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2019/06/Art_17_The-Contours-of-Defend-Forward.pdf.
Google Scholar

Layton P., “Bringing the Grey Zone into Focus”, The Interpreter, 22 July 2021, at https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/bringing-grey-zone-focus.
Google Scholar

Libicki M.C., Crisis and Escalation in Cyberspace, Santa Monica, CA 2012, https://doi.org/10.7249/MG1215.
Google Scholar

Libicki M.C., Tkacheva O., “Cyberspace Escalation: Ladders or Lattices?”, in A. Ertan et al. (eds), Cyber Threats and NATO 2030: Horizon Scanning and Analysis, Tallinn 2020, at https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2020/12/Cyber-Threats-and-NATO-2030_Horizon-Scanning-and-Analysis.pdf.
Google Scholar

Maass R.W., “Salami Tactics: Faits Accomplis and International Expansion in the Shadow of
Google Scholar

Major War”, Texas National Security Review, vol 5, no. 1 (Winter 2021/2022), https://doi.org/10.15781/eyt5-2k84.
Google Scholar

McGuire M., Nation States, Cyberconflict and the Web of Profit, HP Development Company, 2021, at https://threatresearch.ext.hp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/hp-bps-web-ofprofit-report_APR_2021.pdf.
Google Scholar

McLaughlin J., Twitter, 22 February 2022, at https://twitter.com/jmclaughlinSAIS/status/1495931329447407621.
Google Scholar

Morris L.J. et al., Gaining Competitive Advantage in the Gray Zone: Response Options for Coercive Aggression Below the Threshold of Major War, Santa Monica, CA 2019, https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2942.
Google Scholar

Nakashima E., “Cyberattack on Mideast Energy Firms Was Biggest Yet, Panetta Says”, The Washington Post, 11 October 2012, at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nationalsecurity/cyberattack-on-mideast-energy-firms-was-biggest-yet-panetta-says/2012/10/11/fe41a114-13db-11e2-bf18-a8a596df4bee_story.html.
Google Scholar

National Security Bureau, “(Mini)słownik BBN: Propozycje nowych terminów z dziedziny bezpieczeństwa”, at https://docplayer.pl/21264635-Mini-slownik-bbn-propozycje-nowychterminow-z-dziedziny-bezpieczenstwa.html.
Google Scholar

Ni V., “China Ponders How Russia’s Actions in Ukraine Could Reshape World Order”, The Guardian, 25 February 2022, at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/25/china-ponders-how-russia-actions-ukraine-reshape-world-order.
Google Scholar

Office of the Director of National Intelligence, “A Guide to Cyber Attribution”, 14 September 2018, https://www.dni.gov/files/CTIIC/documents/ODNI_A_Guide_to_Cyber_Attribution.pdf.
Google Scholar

Owens W.A., Dam K.W., Lin H.S. (eds), Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S.
Google Scholar

Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities, Washington, DC 2009, https://doi.org/10.17226/12651.
Google Scholar

Pifer S., “Crimea: Six Years after Illegal Annexation”, The Brookings Institution, 10 March 2020, at https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/03/17/crimea-sixyears-after-illegal-annexation/.
Google Scholar

Popp G., Canna S., The Characterization and Conditions of the Gray Zone, A Virtual Think Tank Analysis (ViTTa), Boston, MA 2016, at http://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Final_NSI-ViTTa-Analysis_The-Characterization-and-Conditions-ofthe-Gray-Zone.pdf.
Google Scholar

Report: Military Operations in Cyberspace. Wednesday 5-Friday 7 September 2018. WP1635, Wilton Park, at https://www.wiltonpark.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/WP1635-Report.pdf.
Google Scholar

Rid T., Buchanan B., “Attributing Cyber Attacks”, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 38, no. 1-2 (2015), pp. 4-37, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.977382.
Google Scholar

Rogin J., “Biden Doesn’t Want to Change China. He Wants to Beat It”, The Washington Post, 10 February 2022, at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/02/10/biden-china-strategy-competition/.
Google Scholar

Schaus J., “Competing in the Gray Zone”, Center for Strategic and International Studies, 24 October 2018, at https://www.csis.org/analysis/competing-gray-zone-0.
Google Scholar

Schmitt M.N. (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations, Tallinn 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822524.
Google Scholar

Schneider J.G., “Persistent Engagement: Foundation, Evolution and Evaluation of a Strategy”, Lawfare, 10 May 2019, https://www.lawfareblog.com/persistent-engagement-foundation-evolution-and-evaluation-strategy.
Google Scholar

Smith M., “Russia Has Been at War with Ukraine for Years – In Cyberspace”, The Conversation, 7 February 2022. https://theconversation.com/russia-has-been-at-war-with-ukraine-for-years-in-cyberspace-176221.
Google Scholar

Starling C.G. et al., Seizing the Advantage: A Vision for the Next US National Defense Strategy, Washington, DC 2021.
Google Scholar

Takashi S., “Maritime Security Study Group Research Progress Report. Increasingly Complex and Sophisticated ‘Hybrid Warfare’ during Peacetime: Japan’s Comprehensive Response and the Japan-US Response”, NPI Research Note, 11 September 2020, at http://www.iips.org/en/research/NPI_Research_Note_20201005.pdf.
Google Scholar

The NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, “Ukrainian Parliamentary Election Interference (2014)”, at https://cyberlaw.ccdcoe.org/wiki/Ukrainian_parliamentary_election_interference_(2014).
Google Scholar

The White House, International Strategy for Cyberspace. Prosperity, Security, and Openness in a Networked World, May 2011, at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/international_strategy_for_cyberspace.pdf.
Google Scholar

The White House, The Interim National Security Strategic Guidance, March 2021, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf.
Google Scholar

United States Cyber Command, Achieve and Maintain Cyberspace Superiority: Command Vision for US Cyber Command, April 2018, at https://www.cybercom.mil/Portals/56/Documents/USCYBERCOM%20Vision%20April%202018.pdf.
Google Scholar

United States Department of Defense, Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2020: Annual Report to Congress, at https://media.defense.gov/2020/Sep/01/2002488689/-1/-1/1/2020-DOD-CHINA-MILITARY-POWER-REPORTFINAL.PDF.
Google Scholar

United States Department of Defense, Summary: Department of Defense Cyber Strategy 2018, at https://media.defense.gov/2018/Sep/18/2002041658/-1/-1/1/CYBER_STRATEGY_SUMMARY_FINAL.PDF.
Google Scholar

United States Department of Defense, Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge, at https://www.cybercom.mil/Portals/56/Documents/USCYBERCOM%20Vision%20April%202018.pdf.
Google Scholar

Velde J.R. van de, “Make Cyberspace Great Again Too!”, Real Clear Defence, 23 July 2018, at https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2018/07/23/make_cyberspace_great_again_too_113634.html.
Google Scholar

Zetter K., “Inside the Cunning, Unprecedented Hack of Ukraine’s Power Grid”, Wired, 3 March 2016, at https://www.wired.com/2016/03/inside-cunning-unprecedented-hackukraines-power-grid/.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Dziwisz, Dominika. 2022. “Cyber Pearl Harbor Is Not Coming: US Politics Between War and Peace”. Politeja 19 (4 (79):95-109. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.79.07.

Issue

Section

Understanding Contemporary Security