Nowa wojna, stara metoda. Koncepcje wykorzystania operacji peace-keeping jako instrumentu rozwiązywania rosyjsko-ukraińskiego konfliktu zbrojnego
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.93.03Keywords:
peacekeeping operation, the United Nations, security policy, demarcation line, Russian-Ukrainian war, Russia, Donbas, Ukraine, armed conflict settlement, crisis response operations, Minsk Agreements, the European UnionAbstract
NEW WAR, OLD METHOD: CONCEPTS OF USING PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN ARMED CONFLICT SETTLEMENT
The aim of this article is to present concepts for resolving the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict based on the classic crisis response mechanism of a peacekeeping operation. Proposals for establishing such an operation—both in its traditional and expanded form—were developed in various variants between 2015 and 2018, suggesting the involvement of contingents from the European Union, the United Nations, or Multinational Forces. These ideas emerged as a direct response to the stalemate in implementing provisions of the Minsk Agreements. During the first phase of the Russian-Ukrainian war, experts pointed out the high adaptability of peacekeeping mechanisms to the conditions of modern armed conflicts, particularly hybrid warfare. This adaptability included expanding the mission’s policing and civilian capabilities. Such reflections resulted in numerous analytical and state-sponsored concepts for implementing a peacekeeping operation. However, these efforts were ultimately unsuccessful due to Moscow’s position. The final part of the article analyzes the reasons behind this failure and explores the capabilities of peacekeeping operations as an instrument for overcoming the conflict—particularly in a scenario where active military operations in Ukraine come to an end. In this context, the article outlines the preconditions for resuming discussions on deploying such a mission, assessed through the lens of ripeness theory and the concept of hurting stalemate.
Downloads
References
Croatian Peacekeeping Model Best for Donbas – Ukraine’s Ministry for Occupied Areas, UNIAN, 23 X 2018, [online] https://www.unian.info/politics/10309443-croatian-peacekeeping-model-best-for-donbas-ukraine-s-ministry-for-occupied-areas.html.
Domagała-Pereira K., Niemcy z dystansem o misji pokojowej UE na Ukrainie, 20 II 2015, [online] https://www.dw.com/pl/niemcy-z-dystansem-o-misji-pokojowej-ue-na-ukrainie/a-18271033.
Dyner A.M., Szeligowski D., Perspektywy misji pokojowej ONZ w Donbasie, „Biuletyn PISM” 2017, no. 94, 5 X, 2017, [online] https://www.pism.pl/publikacje/Perspektywy_misji_pokojowej_ONZ_w_Donbasie.
Dziewulska A., Sztuka rozwiązywania konfliktu zbrojnego, Warszawa 2007.
Gabriel stellt die deutsche Russlandpolitik infrage, „Neue Zürcher Zeitung”, 8 IX 2017, [online]
https://www.nzz.ch/international/aussenpolitik-im-bundestagswahlkampf-gabriel-stellt-die-deutsche-russlandpolitik-infrage-ld.1314956. Gowan R., Can the United Nations United Ukraine? Raport, Hudson Institute, Washington 2018.
Kardaś S., Konończuk W., Mińsk 2 – kruchy rozejm zamiast trwałego pokoju, OSW, 12 II 2015, [online] https://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2015-02-12/minsk-2-kruchy-rozejmzamiast-trwalego-pokoju.
Kortunov A., Will Donbass Live to See the UN Peacekeepers?, Russian International Affairs Council, 11 XII 2017, [online] https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/will-donbass-live-to-see-the-un-peacekeepers/.
Freedman L., Ukraine and the Art of Exhaustion, „Survival: Global Politics and Strategy” 2015, no. 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2015.1090132
Łomanowski A., Wojna Rosji z Ukrainą. Druga rocznica inwazji niewidoczna na froncie. Kiedy przełom?, „Rzeczpospolita”, 2024, 25 II, [online] https://www.rp.pl/konflikty-zbrojne/art39-899951-wojna-rosji-z-ukraina-druga-rocznica-inwazji-niwidoczna-na-foncie-kiedy-przelom.
Malyarenko T., Peacekeeping in Ukraine’s Donbas: Opportunities and Risks, Institutio per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, 26 X 2021, [online] https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/why-un-peacekeeping-mission-ukraine-doomed-fail-32116.
Melnyk O., Umland A., Why and How a Combined UN/EU Peacekeeping Mission Could Disentangle the Donbas Conundrumd, Global IndraStra, 16 IV 2016, [online] https://www.indrastra.com/2016/04/OPINION-Why-and-How-Combined-UN-EU-Peacekeeping-Mission-Disentangle-the-Donbas-Conundrum-002-04-2016-0042.html.
Miller Ch., Explainer: What Is the Steinmeier Formula and Did Zelenskiy Just Capitulate to Moscow?, 2 X 2019, [online] https://www.rferl.org/a/what-is-the-steinmeier-formula-and-didzelenskiy-just-capitulate-to-moscow-/30195593.html.
Norman L., Barnes J.E., U.S. to Seek Russian Approval for Peacekeepers in Eastern Ukraine, 9 XI 2017, [online] https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-to-seek-russian-approval-for-peace keepers-in-eastern-ukraine-1510258304.
Putin Says UN Peacekeepers Could Be Deployed Throughout Ukraine Conflict Zone, Radio Free Europe, 11 IX 2017, [online] https://www.rferl.org./a/ukraine-putin-un-peacekeepersmerkel-border-osce/28729481.html.
Raport: misja pokojowa ONZ na Ukrainie musiałaby liczyć 20 tys. żołnierzy, Dziennik. Gazeta Prawna, 12 II 2018, [online] https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/wiadomosci/artykuly/110-3811,raport-misja-pokojowa-onz-na-ukrainie-musialaby-liczyc-20-tys-zolnierzy.html.
Rasmussen and Vershbow: The UN Should Test Russian Sincerity for a Donbas Peacekeeping Force, Rasmussen Global, 18 IX 2017, [online] https://rasmussenglobal.com/rasmussen-andvershbow-the-un-should-test-russian-sincerity-for-a-donbas-peacekeeping-force/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.