Conspiracy Narratives About the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Origins of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus: A Contribution to Polish-Czech Comparative Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.98.17Keywords:
COVID-19 pandemic, infodemic, conspiracy theories, vaccinations, Czechia, Poland, health policyAbstract
This article presents the results of a comparative research study on belief in COVID-19-related conspiracy theories among social science students in Poland and the Czech Republic. The study investigates the relationship between susceptibility to disinformation and factors such as religiosity, trust in science, and the evaluation of institutional responses to the pandemic. Using a quantitative approach (CAPI survey), the authors identify notable differences between the two national groups, with Polish students showing a greater inclination toward conspiracy narratives. The article also explores correlations between such beliefs and negative assessments of the EU’s actions. The findings highlight the role of cultural context and psychological predispositions in shaping attitudes toward health-related misinformation, underlining the need for further research into the social and political consequences of the infodemic. The study contributes to political science by linking disinformation susceptibility with systemic trust and civic attitudes in Central Europe.
Downloads
References
Bastard G., Dziennik z dni zarazy, Poznań 2024.
Bäcker R. et al., Metodologia badań politologicznych, Warszawa 2016.
Brands H., Gavin F.J, “COVID-19 and World Order,” in H. Brands, F.J. Gavin (eds), COVID-19
and World Order. The Future of Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, Baltimore 2020, pp. 1-20.
Brooks E., Guy M., “EU Health Law and Policy. Shaping a Future Research Agenda,” Health Economics, Policy and Law, vol. 16, no. 1 (2021), pp. 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133120000274.
Caiani M., Susanszky P., Saridakis N., “Radical Right and Anti-Vax Protests between Movements and Parties. A Comparative Study,” Acta Politica, vol. 60 (2025), pp. 139-166, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-024-00339-5.
Czachór Z., Marcinkowski T., Sikorski J., “Polityka zdrowotna Unii Europejskiej w obliczu działań klasyfikowanych jako walka informacyjna. Casus pandemii COVID‑19,” in K.A. Nawrot, K. Prandecki (eds), Skutki i zagrożenia cywilizacji informacyjnej, Warszawa 2023, pp. 159-179.
Czech F., Ścigaj P., Popularność narracji spiskowych w Polsce czasu pandemii COVID-19. Raport z reprezentatywnych badań sondażowych, Kraków 2020, at http://www.ism.uj.edu.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2020/07/covid-narracje-spiskowe.pdf.
Dawidczyk A., Jurczak J., Metodologia bezpieczeństwa w przykładach i zastosowaniach. Podręcznik akademicki, Warszawa 2022.
Demczuk A., “Ruch antyszczepionkowy w Polsce i jego kabiny pogłosowe w alt-internet w latach 2020-2022,” Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, vol. 20, no. 3 (2022), pp. 9-35, https://doi.org/10.36874/RIESW.2022.3.1.
European Commision, “Preparedness for COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies and Vaccine Deployment,” Communication from The Commission To The European Parliament and The Council, Brussels, 15.10.2020, COM(2020) 680 final, at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52020DC0680.
European Commission, “What Are Conspiracy Theories? Why Do They Flourish?,” at https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/fighting-disinformation/identifying-conspiracy-theories_pl.
European Parliament, “Uncertainty/EU/Hope. Public opinion in times of Covid-19. Third round. Public opinion survey commissioned by the European Parliament. A Public Opinion Monitoring Study,” Brussels 2020, at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/files/be-heard/eurobarometer/2020/public_opinion_in_the_eu_in_time_of_coronavirus_crisis_3/en-covid19-survey3-report.pdf.
Forman R., Shah S., Jeurissen P., Jit M., Mossialos E., “COVID-19 Vaccine Challenges. What Have We Learned So Far and What Remains To Be Done?,” Health Policy, vol. 125, no 5 (2021), pp. 553-567, https://doi.org/ 0.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.013.
Gates B., Jak zapobiec kolejnej pandemii, transl. by M. Rogalski, Warszawa 2022.
Golinowska S., Zabdyr-Jamroz M., “Zarządzanie kryzysem zdrowotnym w pierwszym półroczu pandemii COVID-19. Analiza porównawcza na podstawie opinii ekspertów z wybranych krajów,” Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie, vol. 18, no. 1 (2020), pp. 1-31, https://doi.org/10.4467/20842627OZ.20.001.12655.
Golka M., Bariery w komunikowaniu i społeczeństwo (dez)informacyjne, Warszawa 2008.
Grzesiak-Feldman M., Psychologia myślenia spiskowego, Warszawa 2016.
Heitkamp A., Mowen T.J., “Self-Control and Belief in Conspiracy Theories,” Social Currents vol. 10, no. 6 (2023), pp. 503-511, https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965231193382.
Islam Md.S. et al., “COVID-19-Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health. A Global Social Media Analysis,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 103, no. 4 (2020), pp. 1621-1629, https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812.
Jabkowski P., Domaradzki J., Baranowski M., “Religiosity and Beliefs in Medical Conspiracy Theories in 37 European Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, article no. 434 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04781-4.
Jedinger A., Siegers P, “Religion, Spirituality, and Susceptibility to Conspiracy Theories. Examining the Role of Analytic Thinking and Post-Critical Beliefs,” Politics and Religion, vol. 17, no. 3 (2024), pp. 389-409, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048324000130.
Kapsa I., Lubik-Reczek N., Ušiak J., “War in Ukraine from the Perspective of Polish and Slovak University Students,” Athenaeum. Polish Political Science Studies, vol. 75, no. 3 (2022), pp. 270-287, https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2022.75.16.
Landay J., Pamuk H., Lewis S., “U.N. Says No Evidence to Back Russian Claim of Ukraine Biological Weapons Program,” Reuters, 11 March 2022, at https://www.reuters.com/world/un-says-not-aware-any-biological-weapons-program-ukraine-2022-03-11/.
Łowicki P., Marchlewska M., Molenda Z., Karakula A., Szczepańska D., “Does Religion Predict Coronavirus Conspiracy Beliefs? Centrality of Religiosity, Religious Fundamentalism, and COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 187, article no. 111413 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111413.
Marcinkowski T., “Polityka antykryzysowa Unii Europejskiej w obliczu pandemii SARS CoV-2 w obszarze zdrowia publicznego w 2020 roku. W poszukiwaniu rozwiązań funkcjonalnych,” Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, no. 15 (2021), pp. 181-194, https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2021.15.12.
Marcinkowski T., Sikorski J., “The European Union’s Policy towards the COVID-19 Crisis in 2020 and the Russian Contribution to Infodemic,” in N. Moch, W. Wereda, J. Stańczyk (eds), Information, Security and Society in the COVID-19 Pandemic, Abingdon–New York 2023, pp. 147-172.
Marcinkowski T., Sikorski J., Vomlela L., “The Sense of Security in the Face of the War in Ukraine. Comparative Study of Poland and the Czech Republic,” Eastern Journal of European Studies, vol. 15, no. SI (2024), pp. 292-316, https://doi.orf/10.47743/ejes-2024-SI14.
Marino G, Iannelli L., “Seven Years of Studying the Associations between Political Polarization and Problematic Information. A Literature Review,” Frontiers in Sociology, vol 8 (2023), pp. 1-17, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1174161.
Pałka-Suchojad K., “Disinformation Virus. Fake News in the Pandemic Era,” Athenaeum. Polish Political Science Studies, vol. 68, no. 4 (2020), pp. 32-41, https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2020.68.03.
Savranska K., Problematyka walki informacyjnej w relacjach Rosji z wybranymi państwami europejskimi. Perspektywa medioznawcza, Gdańsk 2020.
Sikorski J., “Social Implications of Infodemic Concurrent with COVID-19,” Polish Political Science Yearbook, vol. 52, no. 4 (2023), pp. 79-89, https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202253.
Sikorski J., “Infodemia,” in W. Fehler (ed.), Leksykon bezpieczeństwa informacyjnego, Siedlce 2023, pp. 158-160.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.