Who Controls the Buttons? Algomorphic Society, Technocracy, and Italian Politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.16Keywords:
artificial intelligence, digital technocracy, organizational myths, post-reality, Italian politics, algorithmic governanceAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence and predictive algorithms into political processes marks a profound transformation of governance and democracy. In Italy, the adoption of digital tools by political parties and institutions – such as the Rousseau platform of the Movimento 5 Stelle and La Bestia of Lega – demonstrates how politics is increasingly shaped by algorithmic optimization logics, reducing the space for traditional democratic deliberation. This study examines how AI’s role in politics is not always driven by genuine needs but often by external pressures and the imperative to conform to technological modernization models and it explores the risk of a digital technocracy, in which decision-making power progressively shifts from representative institutions to predictive systems. The reflection concludes with the metaphor of the ‘control room’ questioning who truly controls decision-making today: elected representatives or the invisible architectures of algorithms? The article critically examines the future of democracy in an era where society is becoming increasingly algomorphic, shaped by automated systems and post-reality dynamics.
Downloads
References
Agamben G., Stato di eccezione, Torino 2005.
Antonelli F., Tecnocrazia e democrazia, Roma 2019.
Baudrillard J., Simulacra and Simulation, Ann Arbor 1994.
Bourdieu P., La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement, Paris 1979.
Burnham J., The Managerial Revolution. What Is Happening in the World, London 2021 (orig. ed. 1941).
Clark A., Chalmers D., “The Extended Mind,” Analysis, vol. 58, no. 1 (1998), pp. 7-19, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150.
Crawford K., The Atlas of AI. Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence, New Haven 2021.
Debord G., La société du spectacle, Paris 1967.
Eco U., Il costume di casa, Milano 1976.
Fenster M., Conspiracy Theories. Secrecy and Power in American Culture, Minneapolis 2008.
Foucault M., Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison, Paris 1975.
Grassi E., “La costruzione del sociale nell’epoca della postrealtà,” Società Mutamento Politica, vol. 13, no. 25 (2023), pp. 185-194, https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-13689.
Grassi E., Per una sociologia algomorfica, FrancoAngeli, Milano 2024.
Green M. Strange J.J., Brock T.C. (eds), Narrarive Impact. Social and Cognitive Foundations, London 2002.
Howard P., Lie Machines. How to Save Democracy from Troll Armies, Deceptive Robots, and Fake News, New Haven 2020.
Kreps S., Kriner D., “How AI Threatens Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 122-131.
Latour B., Disinventare la modernità, Milano 2008.
McIntyre L., Post-Truth, Cambridge 2018.
Pariser E., The Filter Bubble. What the Internet is Hiding from You, London 2011.
Postman N., Amusing Ourselves to Death. Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, London 1985.
Summerfield C., Argyle L., Bakker M. et al., “How Will Advanced AI Systems Impact Democracy?,” arXiv, 27 August 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.06729
Tufekci Z., Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, New Haven 2017.
Veblen T., The Engineers and the Price System, New York 1964 (orig. ed. 1921).
Westerlund G., Organizational Myths, New York 1979.
Yeung K., “Algorithmic Regulation. A Critical Interrogation,” Regulation & Governance, vol. 12, no. 4 (2018), pp. 505-523.
Zuboff S., Il capitalismo della sorveglianza, Roma 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
