Rethinking International Relations through the Middle East
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.103.01Keywords:
Middle East, Middle East Studies, IR TheoriesAbstract
This article examines the evolving relationship between the Middle East as a region and the broader field of International Relations (IR) theory. It investigates how different IR paradigms – realism, liberalism, constructivism, postcolonialism, and critical theories – have interacted with or been challenged by the Middle East’s regional dynamics. Drawing primarily from recent scholarship, this work highlights the gap between universal IR theory and region-specific complexities, ultimately proposing a more pluralistic and culturally informed theoretical synthesis.
Downloads
References
Anderson L., “Democracy in the Arab World: A Critique of the Political Culture Approach,” Journal of Asian and African Studies, vol. 26, no. 1–2 (1991), pp. 77-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853891-006
Balzacq Th., Baele S.J., “The Third Debate and Postpositivism,” International Studies, 22 December 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.104
Bank A., “Comparative Area Studies and the Study of Middle East Politics after the Arab Uprising,” in A.I. Ahram, P. Köllner, R. Sil (eds), Comparative Area Studies: Methodological Rationales and Cross-Regional Applications, New York 2018, pp. 119-130, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190846374.003.0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190846374.003.0007
Barnett M.N., Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order, New York 1998.
Barnett M.N., “Identity and Alliances in the Middle East,” in P.J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York 1996.
Bates R.H., “Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?,” PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 30, no. 2 (1997), pp. 166-169, https://doi.org/10.2307/420485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/420485
Bayat A., Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East, Stanford, CA 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053569115
Beblawi H., “The Rentier State in the Arab World,” in G. Luciani (ed.), The Arab State, Routledge 1990.
Bilgin P., “Is the ‘Orientalist’ Past the Future of Middle East Studies?,” Third World Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2 (2004), pp. 423-433, https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000174897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000174897
Binder L., “The Middle East as a Subordinate International System,” World Politics, vol. 10, no. 3 (1958), pp. 408-429, https://doi.org/10.2307/2009495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009495
Buzan B., Weaver O., Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491252
Calculli M., “Self-Determination at All Costs: Explaining the Iran–Syria–Hezbollah Axis,” in Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, vol. 54, no. 2 (2020), pp. 95-118, https://doi.org/10.26331/1118.
Campbell D., Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Minneapolis 1992.
Chibber V., Postcolonial Theory and the Spectre of Capital, London–New York 2013.
Cox R.W., “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,”
Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2 (1981), pp. 126-155, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
Crepy P., “Proxy Warfare’s Impact on Sectarianization: The Case of the Saudi-Iranian Rivalry,”
FLUX: International Relations Review, vol. 9, no. 1 (2018), pp. 23-35, https://doi.org/10.26443/firr.v9i1.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26443/firr.v9i1.6
Doyle M.W., “Liberalism and World Politics,” American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4 (1986), pp. 1151-1169, https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861
Eckersley R., The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3364.001.0001
Finnemore M., Sikkink K., “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (1998), pp. 887-917, https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Gause III F.G., The International Relations of the Persian Gulf, Cambridge 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818264
Ghattas K., Black Wave: Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Forty-Year Rivalry that Unravelled Culture, Religion, and Collective Memory in the Middle East, London 2020.
Gill S., Power and Resistance in the New World Order, Basingstoke 2003.
Guzzini S., Leander A. (eds), Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, London–New York 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203401880
Haass R.N., Intervention: The Use of American Military Force in the Post-Cold War World, Washington, DC 1999.
Haddad B., Business Networks in Syria: The Political Economy of Authoritarian Resilience, Stanford, CA 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137344045_12
Hanieh A., Capitalism and Class in the Gulf Arab States, London 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119604
Jackson P.Th., The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, London–New York 2011.
Jackson R., Sørensen G., Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, Oxford 2013.
Kamrava M., Iran’s Intellectual Revolution, Cambridge 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756146
Keohane R., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ 1984.
Keohane R., Nye J.S., Power and Interdependence, Boston 1977.
Khalidi R., “Is There a Future for Middle East Studies?,” Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 1 (1995), pp. 1-6, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23061200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400030406
Lapid Y., “Culture’s Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory,” in Y. Lapid, F. Kratochwil (eds.), The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, Boulder 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853952
Lapid Y., “Through Dialogue to Engaged Pluralism: The Unfinished Business of the Third Debate,” International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 1 (2003), pp. 128-131, https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.501019_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.501019_3
Lynch M., The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolution of the New Middle East, New York 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/lync15884
Lynch M., Voices of the New Arab Public: Iraq, Al-Jazeera, and Middle East Politics Today, New York 2006.
McCourt D.M., The New Constructivism in International Relations Theory, Bristol 2023, https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529217827.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529217827.001.0001
Mearsheimer J.J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York 2001.
Miao Y., “Promoting Theoretical Pluralism in International Relations: Through the Empirical Case of Realism and Constructivism,” Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, vol. 22 (2023), pp. 184-188, https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/22/20230279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/22/20230279
Moravcsik A., “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization, vol. 51, no. 4 (1997), pp. 513-553, https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
Morgenthau H.J., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York 1948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086875
Norton A.R., Hezbollah: A Short History, Princeton, NJ 2007.
Onuf N., World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia, SC 1989.
Patten A., “The Idea of Israel as a Jewish State,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, vol. 21, no. 2 (2020), pp. 531-559, https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2020-0023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2020-0023
Reitzel W., Kaplan M.A., Coblenz C.G., United States Foreign Policy, 1945–1955,Washington, DC 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/444548
Said E.W., Orientalism, New York 1978.
Salzman P.C., Divine Robinson D. (eds), Postcolonial Theory and the Arab–Israeli Conflict, London 2008.
Seth S., Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction, London 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073025
Smith S., Booth K., Zalewski M. (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
Sondermann F.A., “The Study of International Relations,” World Politics, vol. X, no. 1 (1957). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009227
Telhami S., Power and Leadership in International Bargaining: The Path to the Camp David Accords, New York 1990.
Telhami S., Barnett M., “Introduction: Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East,” in S. Telhami, M. Barnett (eds), Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East, Ithaca–London 2002.
Tetti A., “Bridging the Gap: IR, Middle East Studies and the Disciplinary Politics of the Area Studies Controversy,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 13, no. 1 (2007), pp. 117-145, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074291
Thompson K.W., “Toward a Theory of International Politics,” American Political Science Review, vol. 49, no. 3 (1955), pp. 733-746, https://doi.org/10.2307/1951435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1951435
Tickner J.A., Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security, New York 1992.
Valbjørn M., “International Relations Theory and the New Middle East: Three Levels of a Debate,” in M. Lynch (ed.), POMEPS Studies 16: International Relations Theory and a Changing Middle East, Washington, DC, 2015, pp. 74-79.
Valbjørn M., “Introduction: The Role of Ideas and Identities in Middle East International Relations,” in M. Valbjørn, F.H. Lawson (eds), International Relations of the Middle East, Vol. 3: The Role of Ideas and Identities in Middle East International Relations, Los Angeles–London–New Delhi 2015, pp. 7-23.
Valbjørn M., “Toward a ‘Mesopotamian Turn’: Disciplinarity and the Study of the International Relations of the Middle East,” Journal of Mediterranean Studies, vol. 14, no. 1/2 (2004), pp. 47-75, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/670360.
Walt S.M., The Origins of Alliances, Ithaca–London 1987.
Waltz K., Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York 1959.
Waltz K.N., Theory of International Politics, New York 1979.
Wastnidge E., “Imperial Grandeur and Selective Memory: Re-assessing Neo-Ottomanism in Turkish Foreign and Domestic Politics,” Middle East Critique, vol. 28, no. 1 (2019), pp. 7-28, https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2018.1549232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2018.1549232
Wendt A., Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
Yavuz M.H., Nostalgia for the Empire: The Politics of Neo-Ottomanism, Oxford 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512289.001.0001
Zdanowski J., The Middle East 2024: Decoding the Complexities of a Regional System, Kraków 2024.
Zehfuss M., Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality, Cambridge 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491795
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
