Colin Bird on Libertarianism

A Critique

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.05

Słowa kluczowe:

libertarianism, self-ownership, rights, utilitarianism, inviolability, redistribution

Abstrakt

In this article, I delve into Colin Bird’s critical evaluation of libertarianism. Bird positions this strand within his broader framework of “liberal individualism,” and he contends that libertarianism, as a prime exemplar of liberal individualism, is inherently self-contradictory because of the perceived tension between self-ownership and individual inviolability. Employing logical and comparative analyses, this research rigorously examines the accuracy of Bird’s reconstruction and interpretation of libertarianism, while also assessing the validity of his assertion that libertarianism harbours internal contradictions. The findings suggest that Bird’s argument does not hold primarily due to misinterpreting the core tenets of libertarianism.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Paweł Nowakowski - Uniwersytet Wrocławski

    Assistant Professor at the Institute of Political Science, the University of Wrocław. His research interests cover libertarianism, human dignity, philosophy of rights and political culture.

Bibliografia

Bird C., The Myth of Liberal Individualism, Cambridge 1999.

Christmas B., “Force and Coercion,” in M. Zwolinski, B. Ferguson (eds), The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism, London–New York 2022, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814243-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814243-13

Dominiak Ł., Wysocki I., “The Anarcho-Capitalist Case Against the State as a Challenge to the Minarchist Libertarians,” Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 70, no. 2 (2022), pp. 53-69, https://doi.org/10.18290/rf2202.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf2202.4

Dominiak Ł., Wysocki I., “Libertarianism, Defense of Property, and Absolute Rights,” Analiza i Egzystencja, vol. 61 (2023), pp. 5-26, https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2023.61-01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2023.61-01

Huemer M., “Is There a Right to Own a Gun?,” Social Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no. 2 (2003), pp. 297-324, https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200329215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200329215

Kramer M.H., Torture and Moral Integrity, Oxford 2004.

Long R.T., Machan T.R. (eds), Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country?, Ashgate 2008.

Nozick R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford–Cambridge 1999.

Rothbard M.N., The Ethics of Liberty, New York–London 1998.

Rothbard M.N., For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, Auburn 2006.

Sher G., [Review of The Myth of Liberal Individualism, by C. Bird] Mind, vol. 110, no. 437 (2001).

Tomasi J., Free Market Fairness, Princeton–Oxford 2012, https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.003.0008

Vallentyne P., “Libertarisme, propriété de soi et homicide consensuel,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, vol. 101, no. 1 (2003), pp. 5-25, https://doi.org/10.2143/RPL.101.1.718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/RPL.101.1.718

Zwolinski M., Tomasi J., The Individualists: Radicals, Reactionaries, and the Struggle for the Soul of Libertarianism, Princeton–Oxford 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691241043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691241043

Opublikowane

24-11-2024

Numer

Dział

Teoria polityki

Jak cytować

“Colin Bird on Libertarianism : A Critique”. 2024. Politeja 21 (3(90): 105-19. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.05.

Podobne artykuły

1-10 z 115

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.