Libertarianizm, uprawnienia naturalne i argument estoppelu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.92.08Słowa kluczowe:
libertarianizm, uprawnienia naturalne, estoppel, Hohfeld, KinsellaAbstrakt
LIBERTARIANISM, NATURAL RIGHTS, AND ESTOPPEL ARGUMENT
The present paper analyzes Stephan Kinsella’s estoppel argument for the existence of natural rights, especially libertarian self-ownership and private property rights. The point of Kinsella’s argument is to demonstrate that because an offender cannot coherently oppose punishment, his victim must have had rights. Peculiarly, the estoppel argument does not assume the existence of the victim’s rights in order to justify punishing the offender. To the contrary, it attempts to justify the existence of the victim’s rights by the putative fact that the offender cannot coherently oppose punishment. The present paper demonstrates by way of the Hohfeldian analysis and syllogistics that the estoppel argument does not prove the existence of the victim’s rights. The main reason for that is that it fails to deny the existence of the offender’s Hohfeldian liberty to use force against the victim and other persons.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Block W., Libertarian Punishment Theory and Unjust Enrichment, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2019, vol. 154(1), s. 103-108, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3469-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3469-7
Dominiak Ł., Accession, Property Acquisition, and Libertarianism, „Diametros: A Journal of Philosophy” 2024, early view, s. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1853
Dominiak Ł., Argumentation Ethics, Self-Ownership, and Hohfeldian Analysis of Rights, „Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2023, vol. 27, s. 75-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29608-6_17
Dominiak Ł., Libertarianizm, sceptycyzm jusnaturalistyczny i argument z uzasadnionego użycia siły, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” 2024, vol. 3(40), s. 5-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.3.5
Dominiak Ł., Libertarianizm i teoria praw podmiotowych, „Athenaeum: Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 2018, vol. 58, s. 41-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2018.58.03
Dominiak Ł., Problem dobrowolnego niewolnictwa w filozofii politycznej libertarianizmu, „Athenaeum: Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 2017, vol. 54, s. 61-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2017.54.04
Dominiak Ł., Problem migracji w filozofii politycznej libertarianizmu, „Civitas: Studia z Filozofii Polityki” 2016, vol. 19, s. 75-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/CIV.2016.19.05
Dominiak Ł., Proceeds of Crime, Punishment, and Libertarianism, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” 2023, vol. 2(35), s. 20-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.2.20
Dominiak Ł., Unjust Enrichment and Libertarianism, „Polish Political Science Review” 2022, vol. 10(2), s. 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2022-0009
Dominiak Ł., Wysocki I., Wójtowicz S., Dialogical Estoppel, Erga Omnes Rights, and Libertarian Theory of Punishment and Self-Defense, „Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2023, vol. 27, s. 38-61.
Hobbes Th., Lewiatan, przeł. C. Znamierowski, Warszawa 2005.
Hohfeld W.N., Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, „Yale Law Journal” 1917, vol. 26(8), s. 710-770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/786270
Hohfeld W.N., Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, „Yale Law Journal” 1913, vol. 23(1), s. 16-59, https://doi.org/10.2307/785533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/785533
Hoppe H.-H., A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Auburn 2006.
Hoppe H.-H., The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, Auburn 2010.
Hoppe H.-H., Utilitarians and Randians vs Reason, „Liberty” 1988, vol. 2 (2), s. 53-54.
Kinsella S., A Libertarian Theory of Punishment and Rights, „Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review” 1997, vol. 30(2), s. 607-645.
Kinsella S., Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights, [w:] The Dialectics of Liberty, red. R.E. Bissell, C.M. Sciabarra, E.W. Younkins, Lanham, MD 2020, s. 91-106.
Kinsella S., Estoppel: A New Justification for Individual Rights, „Reason Papers” 1992, vol. 17 (1), s. 61-94.
Kinsella S., New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory, „Journal of Libertarian Studies” 1996, vol. 12(2), s. 313-326.
Kinsella S., Punishment and Proportionality: The Estoppel Approach, „Journal of Libertarian Studies” 1996, vol. 12(1), s. 51-73.
Kramer M.H., Rights without Trimmings, [w:] M.H. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner, A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquires, New York 2002, s. 7-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.003.0002
Narveson J., The Libertarian Idea, Peterborough 2001.
Nozick R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford 1974.
Rothbard M.N., Man, Economy, and State, Auburn 2009.
Rothbard M.N., The Ethics of Liberty, New York 1998.
Slenzok N., The Libertarian Argumentation Ethics, the Transcendental Pragmatics of Language, and the Conflict-Freedom Principle, „Analiza i Egzystencja / Analysis and Existence” 2022, vol. 58, s. 35-64, https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2022.58-03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2022.58-03
Slenzok N., Filozofia polityczna Hansa-Hermanna Hoppego. Studium krytyczne, Zielona Góra 2024.
Steiner H., An Essay on Rights, Oxford 1994.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
