Can AI Save Democracy?
From Militant Democracy to Cyberocracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.18Słowa kluczowe:
AI and democracy, militant democracy, democratic theory, technology and democracyAbstrakt
We are currently struggling with two transforming phenomena. On the one hand, we are witnessing an unprecedented in the history of mankind acceleration of the amount of data we have and the corresponding ability to collect and analyse it. On the other hand, we are witnessing a constant struggle to make democracy as good as possible – regardless of how such a normative goal is defined. Among many available solutions, the paper concerns two examples. The first is militant democracy, one of the more traditional attempts at saving democracy. Acknowledging its critical challenges, the other solution that is gaining momentum nowadays is discussed: Artificial Intelligence, which is conceptualized here as cyberocracy. What results is the contention that the discrepancy between technology opportunities and the public’s frustration with democratic politics calls for consideration since it may constitute a basis for mapping out some viable options to reinvigorate democratic systems. Through referring to theory of democracy, sample AI democracy-addressed innovations are related to five dimensions: electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian. Such conceptual assessment of AI exemplar technologies designed for diverse forms of engagement in democratic governance offers a conceptual mapping of technologies aligned with democratic principles and allows to move beyond the dominant dystopian approach to the topic.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Abramson J.B., Arterton Ch., Orren G.R., The Electronic Commonwealth. The Impact of New Media Technologies on Democratic Politics, New York 1988.
Adams M., Prins C., “Digitalization through the Lens of Law and Democracy,” in C. Prins, C.
Cuijpers, P.L. Lindseth et al. (eds), Digital Democracy in a Globalized World, Cheltenham 2017, pp. 3-24.
Bernholz L., Landemore H., Reich R., “Introduction,” in L. Bernholz, H. Landemore, R. Reich (eds, Digital Technology and Democratic Theory, Chicago 2021, pp. 1-22.
Bień-Kacała A., Jackiewicz A. “Militant Democracy-demokracja, która sama się broni (?)” [Militant Democracy – a Democracy That Defends Itself (?)], Państwo i Prawo, vol. 8 (2017), pp. 25-41.
Bremmer I., “The Technopolar Moment. How Digital Powers Will Reshape the Global Order,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 100, no. 6 (2021), pp. 112-128, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27121446.
Capoccia G., Defending Democracy. Reactions to Extremist Parties in Interwar European Democracies, Baltimore 2005.
Ceccarini L., “Could the Internet Be a Safety-Net for Democracy in Crisis?” Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, vol. 50, no. 1 (2020), pp. 125-141, https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2019.24.
Chadwick A., “Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance,” I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, vol. 5, no. 1 (2009), pp. 9-41.
Coleman S., Can the Internet Strengthen Democracy?, Malden 2017.
Coleman S., Blumler J.G., The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy, Cambridge 2009.
Coppedge M., Gerring J., Knutsen C.H., et al., “V-Dem Methodology V9.” Gothenburg 2019, https://bit.ly/2pi3jcw.
DanaherJ., Hogan M.J., Noone Ch. et al., “Algorithmic Governance. Developing a Research Agenda through the Power of Collective Intelligence,” Big Data & Society 4, no. 2 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554.
Decentralised Citizens Engagement Technologies, 2016, at https://dcentproject.eu/about-us.
Diamandis P., “Could Tech Make Government as We Know It Irrelevant?,” Singularity Hub, 12 October 2018, at https://bit.ly/2mQUlRY.
Drew J.. “Can Local Government by Lottery Increase Democratic Responsiveness?,” Policy and Politics, vol. 47, no. 4 (2019), pp. 621-636, https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15653392161339.
Drinóczi T., Bień-Kacała A., Illiberal Constitutionalism in Poland and Hungary. The Deterioration of Democracy, Misuse of Human Rights and Abuse of the Rule of Law, London 2022.
Esmark A., The New Technocracy, Bristol 2020.
Feldstein S., The Rise of Digital Repression. How Technology Is Reshaping Power, Politics, and Resistance, New York 2021.
Gagnon J.P., Signs of Democracy (Adjectival Modifications of the English Noun ‘Democracy’), Canberra, 20 April 2021, https://doi.org/10.17632/pthgd7rx92.1.
Gladwell M., “Small Change. Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted,” The New Yorker, 27 September 2010, at https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/10/04/small-changemalcolm-gladwell.
Gomes de Sousa W., Pereira de Melo E.R., De Souza Bermejo P.H. et al., “How and Where Is Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector Going? A Literature Review and Research Agenda,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4 (2019), 101392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004.
Individual Rights and the Federal Rolein Behavior Modification; A Study Prepared by the Staff of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session. Congress of the U.S., Washington 1974, at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED103726.pdf.
Jäske M., Setälä M., “A Functionalist Approach to Democratic Innovations,” Representation.
Journal of Representative Democracy, vol. 56, no. 4 (2020), pp. 467-483, doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1691639.
Kaltwasser C.R., “Populism and the Question of How to Respond to It,” in C.R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford 2017, pp. 489-507.
Katzenbach Ch., Ulbricht L., “Algorithmic Governance,” Internet Policy Review, vol. 8, no. 4 (2019), pp. 1-18, https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1424.
Kurer T., Schöll N., “How Technological Change Affects Regional Voting Patterns,” Political Science Research and Methods, vol. 12, no. 1 (2024), pp. 94-112, https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2022.62.
Lee D., Levi M., Brown J.S., “Democratic Societal Collaboration in a Whitewater World,” in L. Bernholz, H. Landemore, R. Reich (eds) Digital Technology and Democratic Theory, Chicago 2021, pp. 219-240.
Levy Pi.. Collective Intelligence. Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace, Cambridge 1997.
Loewenstein K., “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I,” The American Political Science Review, vol. 31, no. 3 (1937), pp. 417-432, https://doi.org/10.2307/1948164.
Loewenstein K., “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, II,” The American Political Science Review, vol. 31, no. 4 (1937), pp. 638-658, https://doi.org/10.2307/1948103.
Macklem P., “Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determination,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 4, no. 3 (2006), pp. 488-516, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol017.
Mancini P., Home Page, at https://www.piamancini.com/.
Moore M., “Protecting Democratic Legitimacy in a Digital Age,” The Political Quarterly, vol. 90, no. S1 (2019), pp. 92-106, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12572.
Müller J.W., “Militant Democracy,” in M. Rosenfeld, A. Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford 2012, pp. 1253-1269.
Naisbitt J., Megatrends. Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives, New York 1982.
New J., Castro D., “How Policymakers Can Foster Algorithmic Accountability,” Center for Data Innovation, 21 May 2018, at http://www2.datainnovation.org/2018-algorithmic-accountability.pdf.
Pasquale F., The Black Box Society. The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information, Cambridge 2015.
Persily N., “Can Democracy Survive the Internet?,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 28, no. 2 (2017), pp. 63-76, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0025.
Rak J. (ed.), Why Neo-Militant Democracies Endure. The Inner Six in Comparative Perspective, London–New York 2024.
Rak J., Bäcker R. (eds), Neo-Militant Democracies in Post-Communist Member States of the European Union, London 2022.
Rice C., Taylor J.B., Widom J. et al (eds), The Stanford Emerging Technology Review 2023. A Report on Ten Key Technologies and Their Policy Implications, Stanford 2023.
Ronfeldt D., Cyberocracy, Cyberspace, and Cyberology: Political Effects of the Information Revolution, Santa Monica 1991, at https://bit.ly/2Q2xC27.
Ronfeldt D., “Cyberocracy Is Coming,” The Information Society, vol. 8, no. 4 (1992), pp. 243-296, https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1992.9960123.
Sajó A., “Militant Democracy and Emotional Politics,” Constellations, vol. 19, no. 4 (2012), pp. 562-574, https://doi.org/10.1111/cons.12011.
Sætra H.S., “A Typology of AI Applications in Politics,” in A. Visvizi, M. Bodziany (eds), Artificial Intelligence and Its Contexts. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, Cham 2021, pp. 27-43.
Schaffer F.Ch., Gagnon J.P., “Democracies Across Cultures,” Democratic Theory, vol. 10, no. 1 (2023), pp. 91-104, https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2023.100107.
Smith G., Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge 2009.
Tucker J.A., Nagler J., MacDuffee Metzger M. et al., “Big Data, Social Media, and Protest: Foundations for a Research Agenda,” in R.M. Alvarez (ed.), Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction, Cambridge 2016, pp. 199-224.
Vilella G., E-Democracy. On Participation in the Digital Age, Baden-Baden 2019.
Walt S.M., “Big Tech Won’t Remake the Global Order,” Foreign Affairs, 8 November 2021, at https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/08/big-tech-wont-remake-the-global-order/.
Winner L., Autonomous Technology. Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, Cambridge 1978.
Yong, Ed, “A Popular Algorithm Is No Better at Predicting Crimes Than Random People,” The Atlantic, 17 January 2018, at https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/01/
equivant-compas-algorithm/550646.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
