“Good Law” Versus “Bad Law”: Civil Disobedience During the Desegregation Process in the United States of America

Authors

  • Paweł Laidler Jagiellonian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.02

Keywords:

civil disobedience, rule of law, racial segregation, U.S. constitution, U.S. Supreme Court

Abstract

In 1954, after almost sixty years of tolerating the separate-but-equal doctrine shaped in Plessy v. Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to reject the unequal policy of the government in educational system, and thus to initiate changes in the status of racial segregation. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision ignited both positive and negative feelings and emotions of Americans, who began to show two types of civil disobedience. The first type of disobedience was addressed against the Court and its controversial precedent, and could be visible mainly in Southern states among white citizens and some state authorities. Despite the fact that the Court’s decision was binding, Southern judges, politicians as well as ordinary people showed their disobedience towards the highest judicial institution in the country and its notion of desegregation. The second type of civil disobedience was addressed towards these institutions which neglected the necessity of social change and promotion of equality, and could be observed in actions undertaken by various individuals and organizations aiming at broadening the constitutional protection of black Americans. The purpose of the article is to analyze both types of civil disobedience which were initiated by the same source – a judicial precedent, and had an enormous impact on American society of the late 1950s and early 1960s, leading to final change in the perception of the equality  principle as well as the status of civil rights. The article proposes a thesis that the scope and character of civil disobedience may depend on the ideology of certain social groups and therefore influence their attitude to the direction of changes in law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Paweł Laidler, Jagiellonian University

Jagiellonian University Associate Professor of political science, M.A. in law, specializes in U.S. constitutionalism, author of books and articles concerning American judiciary, separation of powers and campaign finance law.

References

Anderson K., Little Rock. Race and Resistance at Central High School, Princeton 2013 (Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832149
Google Scholar

Arsenault R., Freedom Riders. 1961 and the Struggle for Racial Justice, New York 2006 (Pivotal Moments in American History).
Google Scholar

Bass S.J., Blessed are the Peacemakers: Martin Luther King Jr., Eight White Religious Leaders, and the ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’, Baton Rouge 2001.
Google Scholar

Buchanan P.D., Race Relations in the United States. A Chronology, 1896-2005, Jefferson 2005.
Google Scholar

Capel W.C., ‘Comments’ in E.M. Lander, Jr., R.J. Calhoun (eds.), Two Decades of Change. The South Since the Supreme Court Desegregation Decision, Columbia 1975.
Google Scholar

Cates D., Plessy v. Ferguson. Segregation and the Separate-But-Equal Policy, ed. M. York, New York 2012.
Google Scholar

Coffin W.S., Jr., Leibman M.I., Civil Disobedience. Aid or Hindrance to Justice?, Washington, D.C. 1972 (Rational Debate Seminar).
Google Scholar

Curry B.W., Pacelle, R.L., Jr., Marshall B.W., ‘“An Informal and Limited Alliance”: The President and the Supreme Court’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2 (2008), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02637.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02637.x
Google Scholar

Davis P.C., ‘Performing Interpretation: A Legacy of Civil Rights Lawyering in Brown v. Board of Education’ in A. Sarat (ed.), Race, Law, and Culture. Reflections on Brown v. Board of Education, New York 1997.
Google Scholar

Doyle W., An American Insurrection. James Meredith and the Battle of Oxford, Mississippi, 1962, New York 2001.
Google Scholar

Dudziak M., Cold War Civil Rights. Race and the Image of American Democracy, Princeton 2000 (Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America).
Google Scholar

Dworkin R., Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Mass. 1978.
Google Scholar

Freyer T., Little Rock Crisis. A Constitutional Interpretation, Westport 1984 (Contributions in Legal Studies, 30).
Google Scholar

Gaston P.M., ‘Sutpen’s Door: The South since the Brown Decision’ in E.M. Lander, Jr., R.J. Calhoun (eds.), Two Decades of Change. The South Since the Supreme Court Desegregation Decision, Columbia 1975.
Google Scholar

Kaczmarczyk M., Nieposłuszeństwo obywatelskie a pojęcie prawa, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar

Kaczmarczyk M., ‘Nieposłuszeństwo obywatelskie a demokracja’, Studia Socjologiczne, No. 1 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323514657.pp.231-233
Google Scholar

King M.L., Jr., ‘Three Statements on Civil Disobedience (1961-1968)’ in D.R. Weber (ed.), Civil Disobedience in America. A Documentary History, Ithaca 1978.
Google Scholar

King M.L., Jr., ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’ in J. Fahey, R. Armstrong (eds.), A Peace Reader. Essential Readings on War, Justice, Non-violence and World Order, New York 1992.
Google Scholar

Kluger R., Simple Justice. The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality, New York 1976.
Google Scholar

Lang W., Wróblewski J., Sprawiedliwość społeczna i nieposłuszeństwo obywatelskie w doktrynie politycznej USA, Warszawa 1984 (Współczesne Doktryny Polityczno-Prawne USA).
Google Scholar

Laidler P., Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Od prawa do polityki, Kraków 2011 (Prace Amerykanistyczne UJ).
Google Scholar

Lambert F., The Battle of Ole Miss. Civil Rights vs. States’ Rights, New York 2010 (Critical Historical Encounters). McKeever R.J., The U.S. Supreme Court. A Political and Legal Analysis, Manchester 1997.
Google Scholar

Pach C.J., Richardson E., The Presidency of Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lawrence 1991 (American Presidency Series). Pieniążek M., ‘Obywatelskie nieposłuszeństwo jako gwarancja praw podmiotowych’, Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 8, No. 1 (2012).
Google Scholar

Packard J.M., American Nightmare. The History of Jim Crow, New York 2003.
Google Scholar

Mathiowetz D. (ed.), Hanna Fenichel Pitkin. Politics, Justice, Action, New York 2016 (Routledge Innovators in Political Theory, 7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813561
Google Scholar

Rawls J., Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 1971.
Google Scholar

Szutta A., Obywatelskie nieposłuszeństwo. Próba określenia pojęcia, Warszawa 2011.
Google Scholar

Thoreau H.D., ‘On the Duty of Civil Disobedience [Resistance to Civil Government]’ [1849] in idem, Reform Papers, ed. W. Glick, Princeton 1973.
Google Scholar

Tomlins C. (ed.), The United States Supreme Court. The Pursuit of Justice, Boston 2005.
Google Scholar

Tushnet M., ‘Brown v. Board of Education (1954)’ in A. Gordon-Reed (ed.), Race on Trial. Law and Justice in American History, New York 2002 (Viewpoints on American Culture).
Google Scholar

Vall M. du, ‘Electronic civil disobedience (ECD) jako jedna ze współczesnych form obywatelskiego nieposłuszeństwa’, Państwo i Społeczeństwo, No. 2 (2010).
Google Scholar

Vile J.R., A Companion to the United States Constitution and its Amendments, Westport 2006.
Google Scholar

Wilkinson J.H., From Brown to Bakke. The Supreme Court and School Integration, 1954-1978, New York 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195025675.001.0001
Google Scholar

Wilson B.M., Race and Place in Birmingham. The Civil Rights and Neighborhood Movements, Lanham 2000.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-12-17

How to Cite

Laidler, Paweł. 2016. ““Good Law” Versus ‘Bad Law’: Civil Disobedience During the Desegregation Process in the United States of America”. Politeja 13 (45):27-42. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.02.

Issue

Section

Articles