Grief, Anger, and In-between
A Rasaic Analysis of Poile Sengupta’s “Thus Spake Shoorpanakha, So Said Shakuni”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.27.2025.01.10Keywords:
emotional experiences, Indian aesthetics, mythology, marginalized voicesAbstract
Śurpaṇakhā from the Rāmāyaṇa, though she plays a pivotal role in the epic, is often neglected in the main discourse. The character’s exclusion from the central narrative typically positions her as the “other” and reduces her to a flat, villainous archetype. To bring her from the margins to the center, it is crucial to reimagine and reinterpret her narrative in order to reclaim her subjectivity. Thus, this paper proposes revising Śurpaṇakhā in Poile Sengupta’s play, Thus Spake Shoorpanakha, So Said Shakuni, through the lens of the rasa-bhāva theory. It moves beyond the aesthetics to view rasa as a transformative medium, shaping the character’s experiences. It investigates the factors that marginalize Śurpaṇakhā in the traditional narrative and how they instigate dominant sthāyibhāvas like śoka (grief) and krodha (anger), which, respectively, evoke karuṇa rasa and raudra rasa, shaping the character’s internal conflicts and agency. By redefining her emotional complexity, this study challenges traditional Rāmāyaṇa narratives and offers new perspectives on the emotional experience of marginalized voices.
References
Adhya, A. 2019. Revisiting Soorpanakha: The Changing Narrative of a Mythological Character in Indian Literature. In: South Asian Review, 40(2): 59–73.
Ahmed, S. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. 2nd edition. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748691142
Bharata. 2011. Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata. With the Commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Abhinavagupta. Edited by M. Ramakrishna Kavi. Open Source Archive.
Chakravarti, U. 2006. Everyday Lives, Everyday Histories: Beyond the Kings and Brahmanas of ‘Ancient’ India. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
Chakravarty, C. and S. K. Chaudhuri (eds). 2017. The Dichotomies of Body and Mind Spaces: The Widows in Chokher Bali and Chaturanga. In: C. Chakravarty and S. K. Chaudhuri (eds). Tagore’s Ideas of the New Woman: The Making and Unmaking of Female Subjectivity. New Delhi: SAGE Publications: 125–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353280345.n9
Chari, V. K. 1993. Sanskrit Criticism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Davis, R. G. 2014. Writing the Erasure of Emotions in Dystopian Young Adult Fiction: Reading Lois Lowry’s The Giver and Lauren Oliver’s Delirium.
In: Narrative Works, 4(2). Dirghangi, A. and S. Mohanty. 2019. De-mythifying the Ramayana: A Study of the ‘Devoiced’ Surpanakha. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Arts and Humanities, 6(1): 8–15.
Erndl, K. M. 1991. The Mutilation of Surpanakha. In: P. Richman (ed.). Many Ramayanas: The Diversity of a Narrative Tradition in South Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press: 67–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520911758-006
Filmy, S. K. and S. K. Verma. 2017. Performative Representation of Myths in Poile Sengupta’s Thus Spake Shoorpanakha, So Said Shakuni. In: Indian Writing in English: Contemporary Trends and Concerns: 66–78.
Ghosh, M. 2022. Revisiting Bharata’s Rasa Theory: Relevance, Applications, and Contemporary Interpretations. In: Research Hub International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(12): 37–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53573/rhimrj.2022.v09i12.006
Iyengar, K. R. S. 1985. Indian Writing in English. Sterling Publishers.
Maity, A. 2018. Genre Fiction and Aesthetic Relish: Reading Rasa in Contemporary Times. In: B. Chattopadhyay, A. Mandhwani and A. Maity (eds). Indian Genre Fiction: Pasts and Future Histories. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456169-7
Manu. 1886. The Laws of Manu. Translated by Georg Bühler, Sacred Books of the East, vol. 25, Clarendon Press.
Mathur, P. 2023. Natyashastra: A Study of the Underlying Unity of All Arts. In: The Raaga Room.
Mitra, I. 2012. Shoorpanakha and Shakuni Meet to Retell History. In: The Times of India.
Mohanty, C.T. 1984. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3): 333–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/302821
Mullik, G. 2020. Bharata’s Theory of Aesthetic Pleasure or Rasa: Classical Indian Theories of ‘Aesthetics’ and Their Relation to Cinema. In: G. Mullik (ed.). Explorations in Cinema through Classical Indian Theories: New Interpretations of Meaning, Aesthetics, and Art. Palgrave Macmillan Cham: 197–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45611-5_5
Pollock, S. 2016. Rakṣasas and Others: The Demonology of the Rāmāyaṇa.
In: S. Pollock. Rāmāyaṇa and Political Imagination in India. Permanent Black: 163–187.
Rao, L. V. P. 2011. Poile Sengupta’s Thus Spake Shoorpanakha, So Said Shakuni as a Postmodern Text. In: The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 2(1).
Rizvi, S. 2023. Locating Natyashastra: The Warp and Woof of Indian Cinema. Jamshedpur Research Review, 4: 10–15.
Sengupta, P. 2010. Thus Spake Shoorpanakha, So Said Shakuni. In: P. Sengupta.
Women Centre Stage: The Dramatist and the Play. New Delhi: Routledge: 242–282.
Sharma, R. K. 2003. Hardy and the Rasa Theory. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.
Singh, A. 2009. Aesthetics of Indian Feminist Theatre. In: Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(2): 131–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v1n2.05
Singh, S. 1997. Feminism: Theory, Criticism, Analysis. Pencraft International.
Vālmīki. 2021. The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki: The Complete English Translation.
Translated by R. P. Goldman, S. J. Sutherland Goldman, R. Lefeber, S. I. Pollock, and B. A. van Nooten. Revised and edited by R. P. Goldman and S. J. Sutherland Goldman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Verma, E. and B. Singh. 2024. Recovering ‘Lost’ Voices in Mythology: A Study of Poile Sengupta’s Thus Spake Shoorpanakha, So Said Shakuni. In: Theatre International, 20.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-09-24 (2)
- 2025-07-07 (1)
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
