Niezgodność i jej rozwiązanie: O humorystycznych puentach z perspektywy językoznawczej

Anna Krasowska

doi:10.12797/LV.19.2024.38.03

Autor

Anna Krasowska Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-8317

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.19.2024.38.03

Słowa kluczowe:

niezgodność, rozwiązanie niezgodności, puenta, humor

Abstrakt

INCONGRUITY AND ITS RESOLUTION – ON HUMOROUS (PUNCH)LINES FROM A LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE

The aim of the article is to discuss linguistic research on the types of incongruities and ways of resolving them in humorous texts. The author of the article tries to answer the following questions:
– Is incongruity necessary to achieve a humorous effect?
– Is incongruity a sufficient condition for humour?
– Do humorous incongruities exist?
– Is incongruity in humorous texts resolvable and to what extent?
– What mechanisms underlie the resolution of humorous incongruities?

For this purpose, the author refers to, among others, the assumptions of IDM, SSTH, GTVH and FR. Then, she verifies the theoretical assumptions using examples of sixteenth-century Polish jokes (based on Łukasz Górnicki’s Dworzanin polski). Most of the cited assumptions are confirmed; others (such as the possibility of distinguishing one general mechanism for resolving incongruities) are rejected.

Pobrania

Brak dostęþnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Attardo S., 1988, Trends in European humor research: Towards a text model, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 1, nr 4, s. 349–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1988.1.4.349
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Attardo S., 1994, Linguistic Theories of Humor, Berlin – New York.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Attardo S., 1997, The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 10, nr 4, s. 395–420, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Attardo S., 2001, Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis, Berlin – New York, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Attardo S., 2020, The Linguistics of Humor: An Introduction, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791270.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791270.001.0001
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Attardo S., Hempelmann Ch.F., Di Maio S., 2002, Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 15, nr 1, s. 3–46, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.004
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Attardo S., Raskin V., 1991, Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 4, nr 3–4, s. 293–348, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Aubouin E., 1948, Technique et psychologie du comique, Marseilles.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Brône G., Feyaerts K., 2004, Assessing the SSTH and GTVH: A view from cognitive linguistics, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 17, nr 4, s. 361–372, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.361
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Brzozowska D., 2000, O dowcipach polskich i angielskich. Aspekty językowo-kulturowe, „Orbis Linguarum. Legnickie Rozprawy Filologiczne” 22, s. 229–230.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Brzozowska D., 2012, Logiczne aspekty języka a teksty humorystyczne. Rola mechanizmu logicznego w dowcipach, „Investigationes Linguisticae” 25, s. 15–26, https://doi.org/10.14746/il.2012.25.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/il.2012.25.2
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Buttler D., 1968, Polski dowcip językowy, Warszawa.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Bystroń J.S., 1939, Komizm, Lwów.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Chłopicki W., 1995, O humorze poważnie, Kraków.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Davies Ch., 2004, Victor Raskin on jokes, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 17, nr 4, s. 373–380, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.373
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Davies Ch., 2011, Logical mechanisms: A critique, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 24, nr 2, s. 159–165, https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.010
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Dynel M., 2012, What RT cannot do, IR can – on the incremental interpretation of jokes in (non)relevance-theoretic terms, [w:] E. Wałaszewska, A. Piskorska (red.), Relevance Theory: More than Understanding, Newcastle, s. 147–166.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Eichinger Ferro-Luzzi G., 1990, Tamil jokes and the polythetic-prototype approach to humor, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 3, nr 2, s. 147–158, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1990.3.2.147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1990.3.2.147
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Forabosco G., 2008, Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?, „Lodz Papers in Pragmatics” 4(1), s. 45–62, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Freud S., 1993, Dowcip i jego stosunek do nieświadomości, przeł. R. Reszke, Warszawa [wyd. 1 niem. – 1905].
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Giora R., 1991, On the cognitive aspects of the joke, „Journal of Pragmatics” 16(5), s. 465–485, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90137-M. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90137-M
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Górnicki Ł., 1954, Dworzanin polski, oprac. R. Pollak, wyd. 2, Wrocław.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Hempelmann Ch.F., 2000, Incongruity and Resolution of Humorous Narratives – Linguistic Humor Theory and the Medieval Bawdry of Rabelais, Boccaccio, and Chaucer [unpublished M.A. thesis], Youngstown State University.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Hempelmann Ch.F., 2004, Script opposition and logical mechanism in punning, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 17, nr 4, s. 381–392, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.381
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Hempelmann Ch.F., Attardo S., 2011, Resolutions and their incongruities: Further thoughts on logical mechanisms, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 24, nr 2, s. 125–149, https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.008
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Hempelmann Ch.F., Ruch W., 2005, 3 WD meets GTVH: Breaking the ground for interdisciplinary humor research, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 18, nr 4, s. 353–387, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.4.353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.4.353
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Hillson T.R., Martin R.A., 1994, What’s so funny about that? The domains-interaction approach as a model of incongruity and resolution in humor, „Motivation and Emotion” 18, s. 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252473
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Jodłowiec M., 2008, What’s in the punchline?, [w:] E. Wałaszewska, M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk, A. Korzeniowska, M. Grzegorzewska (red.), Relevant Worlds: Current Perspectives on Language, Translation and Relevance Theory, Newcastle upon Tyne, s. 67–86.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Krasowska A., 2020, O pojęciu kompetencji w lingwistycznych badaniach nad humorem, „Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego” LXXVI, s. 107–120, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.6677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.6677
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Krasowska A., 2022, Strukturalna analiza dowcipu – o modelu izotopijno-dysjunkcyjnym Salvatore Attardy z perspektywy kilku dekad, „Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego” LXXVIII, s. 169–182, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2017
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Krasowska A., 2023, Przełączniki izotopii w żartach szesnastowiecznych (na podstawie Dworzanina polskiego Łukasza Górnickiego), [w:] A. Krasowska, A. Karolczuk (red.), Komizm historyczny i współczesny, Warszawa, s. 21–39.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Oring E., 2019, Oppositions, overlaps, and onotologies: The general theory of verbal humor revisited, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 32, nr 2, s. 151–170, https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2018-0066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2018-0066
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Raskin V., 1985, Semantic Mechanisms of Humor, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6472-3
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Raskin V., 1987, Linguistic heuristics of humor: A script-based semantic approach, „International Journal of the Sociology of Language” t. 65, s. 11–26, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-1987-6503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-1987-6503
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Raskin V., 2004, Afterword, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 17, nr 4, s. 429–436, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.429
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Ritchie G., 2004, The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes, London – New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406953
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Ritchie G., 2009, Variants of incongruity resolution, „Journal of Literary Theory” 3(2), s. 313–332, https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.017
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Rothbart M.K., 1976, Incongruity, problem-solving and laughter, [w:] A.J. Chapman, H.C. Foot (red.), Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications, London, s. 37–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203789469-3
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Ruch W., Attardo S., Raskin V., 1993, Toward an empirical verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 6, nr 2, s. 123–136, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.2.123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.2.123
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Samson A.C., Hempelmann Ch.F., 2011, Humor with backgrounded incongruity: Does more required suspension of disbelief affect humor perception?, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 24, nr 2, s. 167–185, https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.011
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Sarbiewski M.K., 1620, De acuto et arguto liber unicus, sive Seneca et Martialis…, [w:] S. Skimina (oprac.), 1958, Wykłady poetyki, Wrocław.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Suls J.M., 1972, A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis, [w:] J.H. Goldstein, P.E. McGhee (red.), The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, New York – London, s. 81–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Tsakona V., 2003, Jab lines in narrative jokes, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 16, nr 3, s. 315–329, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.017
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Veale T., 2004, Incongruity in humor: Root cause or epiphenomenon?, „Humor: International Journal of Humor Research” 17, nr 4, s. 419–428, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.419
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Wyer R.S., Collins J.E., 1992, A theory of humor elicitation, „Psychological Review” 99, nr 4, s. 663–688, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.99.4.663
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Yus F., 2016, Humour and Relevance, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##

Ziv A., 1984, Personality and Sense of Humor, New York.
##plugins.generic.googleScholarLinks.settings.viewInGS##