Fenomen brexitu w rozważaniach szkoły prawa i ekonomii

Authors

  • Artur Niedźwiecki University of Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.66.10

Keywords:

Brexit, economic analysis of law

Abstract

The Phenomenon of Brexit in the Considerations of the School of Law and Economics

The article addresses the issue of Brexit in the context of economic analysis of law using a qualitative method, namely the textual analysis of selected papers devoted to both the process of secession of Great Britain from the European Union and the aforementioned research school. The hypothesis of this work is as follows: economic analysis of law reveals limited applicability to the exegesis of the Community disintegration mechanisms, including Brexit, which is one of the symptoms of these processes. According to the author, it reveals certain shortcomings in the research procedures regarding the phenomenon of EU decomposition, although, on the other hand, some of its components still remain valid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Artur Niedźwiecki, University of Łódź

Doktor nauk humanistycznych w zakresie nauk o polityce, radca prawny, menedżer, wykładowca akademicki. Jego zainteresowania badawcze dotyczą w szczególności prawnych, politycznych i gospodarczych aspektów procesu instytucjonalizacji międzynarodowej. Autor m.in. monografii Polska polityka zagraniczna wobec integracji europejskiej po 2004 roku (Łódź 2012).

References

Alexandrakis C., Jones R., Secession and Exit: an Analysis of Two Competing Hypotheses, [w:] The Elgar Companion to Public Economics: Empirical Public Economics, Cheltenham–Northampton 2006, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845424558.00036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845424558.00036
Google Scholar

Baier S., Bergstrand J., Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements, „Journal of International Economics” 2004, vol. 64, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‑1996(03)00079‑5.
Google Scholar

Berglund S., Prison or Voluntary Cooperation? The Possibility of Withdrawal from the European Union, „Scandinavian Political Science” 2006, vol. 26, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9477.2006.00147.x.
Google Scholar

Bongardt A., Torres F., The Political Economy of Brexit: Why Making It Easier to Leave the Club Could Improve the EU, „Intereconomics” 2016, vol. 51, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272‑016‑0605‑z.
Google Scholar

Borzyskowski I. von, Vabulas F., The Costs of Membership Withdrawal from International Organizations, [w:] Political Economy of International Organizations Conference, 8‑10 February 2018, the University of Wisconsin, Madison, https://www.peio.me/wp‑content/uploads/2018/02/Borzyskowski‑and‑Vabulas_Consequences‑of‑Withdrawal‑paper‑53.pdf.
Google Scholar

Börzel T., Researching the EU (Studies) into Demise?, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2018, vol. 25, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411385
Google Scholar

Browne I., Neo‑liberalism, Identity and Brexit, „Romanian Review of Political Sciences & International Relations” 2017, vol. XIV.
Google Scholar

Brożek B., Stelmach J., Załuski W., Dziesięć wykładów o ekonomii prawa, Warszawa 2017.
Google Scholar

Cooter R., Ulen T., Ekonomiczna analiza prawa, przeł. J. Bełdowski, Warszawa 2011.
Google Scholar

Davies G., What does it all mean?, „German Law Journal” 2016, Brexit Supplement, vol. 17, https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021611
Google Scholar

Gates S., Humes B., Games, Information, and Politics. Applying Game Theoretic Models to Political Science, Ann Arbor 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10678
Google Scholar

Grosse T. G., Podsumowanie. W kierunku teorii dezintegracji regionalnej, [w:] Polityki europejskie w dobie kryzysu, red. T. G. Grosse, Warszawa 2016.
Google Scholar

Ikenberry J., The End of Liberal International Order?, „International Affairs” 2018, vol. 91, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
Google Scholar

Kreilinger V., Becker S., Wolfstander L. M., Brexit. Negotiation Phases and Scenarios of a Drama in Three Acts, „Jacques Delors Institute Policy Paper” 2017, nr 182, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33593.57443.
Google Scholar

Kurrild‑Klitgaard P., Opting‑out: The Constitutional Economics of Exit, „American Journal of Economics and Sociology” 2002, vol. 61, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1111/1536‑7150.00154.
Google Scholar

Martin L., Simmons B., International Organizations and Institutions, [w:] Handbook of International Relations, ed. W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. Simmons, Los Angeles 2013.
Google Scholar

Matthijs M., Europe after Brexit. A Less Perfect Union, „Foreign Affairs” January/February 2017.
Google Scholar

Moravcsik A., The New Liberalism, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. Ch. Reus‑Smit, D. Snidal, Oxford – New York 2008, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0013
Google Scholar

Ries Ch. P. i in., After Brexit: Alternate Forms of Brexit and Their Implications for the United Kingdom, the European Union and the United States, Santa Monica, CA, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2200
Google Scholar

Tetlow G., Stojanovic A., Understanding the Economic Impact of Brexit, Report of the Institute for Government, October 2018.
Google Scholar

Walter S., The Mass Politics of International Disintegration, [online] http://www.stefaniewalter.de/.
Google Scholar

Welfens P., A Brexit Perspective, „The International Economy” Summer 2017.
Google Scholar

Vollaard H., Explaining European Disintegration, „JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies” 2014, vol. 52, no. 5, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12132
Google Scholar

Published

2020-06-25

How to Cite

Niedźwiecki, Artur. 2020. “Fenomen Brexitu W rozważaniach szkoły Prawa I Ekonomii”. Politeja 17 (3(66):145-56. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.66.10.