Fenomen brexitu w rozważaniach szkoły prawa i ekonomii

Authors

  • Artur Niedźwiecki University of Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.66.10

Keywords:

Brexit, economic analysis of law

Abstract

The Phenomenon of Brexit in the Considerations of the School of Law and Economics

The article addresses the issue of Brexit in the context of economic analysis of law using a qualitative method, namely the textual analysis of selected papers devoted to both the process of secession of Great Britain from the European Union and the aforementioned research school. The hypothesis of this work is as follows: economic analysis of law reveals limited applicability to the exegesis of the Community disintegration mechanisms, including Brexit, which is one of the symptoms of these processes. According to the author, it reveals certain shortcomings in the research procedures regarding the phenomenon of EU decomposition, although, on the other hand, some of its components still remain valid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Artur Niedźwiecki, University of Łódź

Doktor nauk humanistycznych w zakresie nauk o polityce, radca prawny, menedżer, wykładowca akademicki. Jego zainteresowania badawcze dotyczą w szczególności prawnych, politycznych i gospodarczych aspektów procesu instytucjonalizacji międzynarodowej. Autor m.in. monografii Polska polityka zagraniczna wobec integracji europejskiej po 2004 roku (Łódź 2012).

References

Alexandrakis C., Jones R., Secession and Exit: an Analysis of Two Competing Hypotheses, [w:] The Elgar Companion to Public Economics: Empirical Public Economics, Cheltenham–Northampton 2006, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845424558.00036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845424558.00036

Baier S., Bergstrand J., Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements, „Journal of International Economics” 2004, vol. 64, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‑1996(03)00079‑5.

Berglund S., Prison or Voluntary Cooperation? The Possibility of Withdrawal from the European Union, „Scandinavian Political Science” 2006, vol. 26, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9477.2006.00147.x.

Bongardt A., Torres F., The Political Economy of Brexit: Why Making It Easier to Leave the Club Could Improve the EU, „Intereconomics” 2016, vol. 51, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272‑016‑0605‑z.

Borzyskowski I. von, Vabulas F., The Costs of Membership Withdrawal from International Organizations, [w:] Political Economy of International Organizations Conference, 8‑10 February 2018, the University of Wisconsin, Madison, https://www.peio.me/wp‑content/uploads/2018/02/Borzyskowski‑and‑Vabulas_Consequences‑of‑Withdrawal‑paper‑53.pdf.

Börzel T., Researching the EU (Studies) into Demise?, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2018, vol. 25, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411385

Browne I., Neo‑liberalism, Identity and Brexit, „Romanian Review of Political Sciences & International Relations” 2017, vol. XIV.

Brożek B., Stelmach J., Załuski W., Dziesięć wykładów o ekonomii prawa, Warszawa 2017.

Cooter R., Ulen T., Ekonomiczna analiza prawa, przeł. J. Bełdowski, Warszawa 2011.

Davies G., What does it all mean?, „German Law Journal” 2016, Brexit Supplement, vol. 17, https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021611

Gates S., Humes B., Games, Information, and Politics. Applying Game Theoretic Models to Political Science, Ann Arbor 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10678

Grosse T. G., Podsumowanie. W kierunku teorii dezintegracji regionalnej, [w:] Polityki europejskie w dobie kryzysu, red. T. G. Grosse, Warszawa 2016.

Ikenberry J., The End of Liberal International Order?, „International Affairs” 2018, vol. 91, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241

Kreilinger V., Becker S., Wolfstander L. M., Brexit. Negotiation Phases and Scenarios of a Drama in Three Acts, „Jacques Delors Institute Policy Paper” 2017, nr 182, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33593.57443.

Kurrild‑Klitgaard P., Opting‑out: The Constitutional Economics of Exit, „American Journal of Economics and Sociology” 2002, vol. 61, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1111/1536‑7150.00154.

Martin L., Simmons B., International Organizations and Institutions, [w:] Handbook of International Relations, ed. W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. Simmons, Los Angeles 2013.

Matthijs M., Europe after Brexit. A Less Perfect Union, „Foreign Affairs” January/February 2017.

Moravcsik A., The New Liberalism, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. Ch. Reus‑Smit, D. Snidal, Oxford – New York 2008, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0013

Ries Ch. P. i in., After Brexit: Alternate Forms of Brexit and Their Implications for the United Kingdom, the European Union and the United States, Santa Monica, CA, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2200

Tetlow G., Stojanovic A., Understanding the Economic Impact of Brexit, Report of the Institute for Government, October 2018.

Walter S., The Mass Politics of International Disintegration, [online] http://www.stefaniewalter.de/.

Welfens P., A Brexit Perspective, „The International Economy” Summer 2017.

Vollaard H., Explaining European Disintegration, „JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies” 2014, vol. 52, no. 5, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12132

Published

2020-06-25

How to Cite

Niedźwiecki, Artur. 2020. “Fenomen Brexitu W rozważaniach szkoły Prawa I Ekonomii”. Politeja 17 (3(66):145-56. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.66.10.