Specyfika wschodniej granicy Unii Europejskiej z perspektywy bezpieczeństwa i rozwoju

Authors

  • Magdalena Lesińska Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Tomasz Stępniewski Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.41.01

Keywords:

European Union’s eastern border, European Union, Eastern Europe, Ukrainian crisis, security

Abstract

The specific nature of the European Union’s eastern border in view of security and development


The shape of the EU’s external policy depends upon the state of the EU itself as well. The Union struggles with several overlapping crises of various nature: 1) financial, 2) Brexit, 3) immigration, 4) Russia-Ukraine hybrid war and challenges for European security, 5) crisis of European identity. Changes emerging in the immediate and more distant surroundings of the EU exert a direct impact upon the sense and perception of EU’s security. Therefore, the security cannot be simplified to that of the individual member states, but must be considered in broader terms i.e. related to the neighboring regions – the post-Soviet states in this particular case. In view of events and developments of 2016, it can be argued that both southern and eastern neighborhood of the EU are challenged with crises, instability and internal conflicts (political, social and military in nature).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions „A European Agenda on Migration”, Brussels, 13 V 2015, COM(2015) 240 final.

Eurostat, Migration and migrant population statistics, V 2015, [online] http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Migration_and_migrant_population_statistics&oldid=264684.

Hollifield J.F., Immigrants, Markets and States. The Political Economy in Post-war Europe, Cambridge (Mass.) 1992.

Komisja Europejska, Komunikat prasowy, Przegląd europejskiej polityki sąsiedztwa (EPS): zacieśnione partnerstwo na rzecz silniejszego sąsiedztwa, Bruksela, 18 XI 2015, [online] http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6121_pl.htm.

Krzemiński A., Wygaszanie Europy, „Polityka” 2016, nr 14 (3053).

Łukaszewski J., Unia i Polska w świecie wstrząsów i przemian, Lublin 2014.

Marklund C., The Return of Geopolitics in the Era of Soft Power: Rereading Rudolf Kjellén on Geopolitical Imaginary and Competitive Identity, „Geopolitics” 2015, Vol. 20, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.928697.

„Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 2015, R. 13, z. 4: European Neighbourhood Policy after the Arab Spring and Russia-Ukraine Hybrid War.

Standard Eurobarometr 82, Public Opinion in the European Union (Autumn 2014), [online] http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb82/eb82_publ_en.pdf.

Standard Eurobarometer 83, Public Opinion in the European Union (Spring 2015), [online] http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb83/eb83_publ_en.pdf.

Waal T. de, Youngs R., Reform as Resilience: An Agenda for the Eastern Partnership, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 14 V 2015, [online] http://carnegieendowment.org/2015/05/14/reform-as-resilience-agenda-for-eastern-partnership/i8k4.

Bezopasnostʹ postsovetskogo prostranstva: novye vyzovy i ugrozy. Security of the Post-Soviet Region. New Challenges and Threats, red. Z. Stankevič, T. Stempnevski, A. Šabacûk, Lûblin–Moskva 2014.

Published

2021-06-21

How to Cite

Lesińska, Magdalena, and Tomasz Stępniewski. 2021. “Specyfika Wschodniej Granicy Unii Europejskiej Z Perspektywy bezpieczeństwa I Rozwoju”. Politeja 13 (2 (41):5-13. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.41.01.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.