The Concept of “Indian Philosophy” as a Product of Intercultural Dialogue (Wilhelm Halbfass’s India and Europe Revisited )

Authors

  • Sergei Serebriany Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.15

Keywords:

philosophy, Western, non‑Western, Indian, Chinese, Russian, transfer, intercultural dialogue

Abstract

This paper is a sequel to another paper of the same author: “Some Marginal Notes on [W. Halbfass’s] India and Europe” (in: E. Franco, K. Preisendanz (eds.), Beyond Orientalism. The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and its Impact on Indian and Cross‑Cultural Studies, Amsterdam–Atlanta 1997). In the present paper the concept of “Indian philosophy” is discussed – with references to the analysis of the concept in the book India and Europe by W. Halbfass. The central idea of the paper is this: “Indian philosophy” is not a kind of primordial entity it is often said to be, but rather a contingent concept which gradually evolved in the 19th and 20th century in the process of intercultural interaction between Indian (South Asian) and European (Western) intellectual traditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Sergei Serebriany, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow

Born in 1946 in Moscow, in 1962-1968 studied Indian languages and literatures at the Institute of Oriental Languages, Moscow State (Lomonosov) University. Since then, attached to various institutions in Moscow, he has been doing research work in the field of Indian literatures, Indian philosophy, and Indian cultural history.

References

Bedekar V.M. (ed.) Philosophy in the Fifteen Modern Indian Languages, Poona 1979.
Google Scholar

Benveniste É., ‘Civilization: A Contribution to the History of the Word’ in idem, Problems in General Linguistics, trans. by M.E. Meek, Coral Gables, Fla 1971 (Miami Linguistics Series, 8).
Google Scholar

Benveniste É., Civilisation: contribution à l’histoire du mot, Paris 1954.
Google Scholar

Bonevac D., Phillips S. (eds.), Understanding Non‑Western Philosophy. Introductory Readings, Mountain View, CA 1993.
Google Scholar

Bowden B. (ed.), Civilization. Critical Concepts in Political Science, Vol. 1‑4, London 2009.
Google Scholar

Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations, trans. by A.P. Peabody, Boston 1886.
Google Scholar

Denecke W., The Dynamics of Masters Literature. Early Chinese Thought from Confucius to Han Feizi, Cambridge, Mass. 2011.
Google Scholar

Droit R.‑P. (ed.), Philosophies d’ailleurs, Vol. 1: Les pensées indiennes, chinoises et tibétaines; Vol. 2: Les pensées hébraïques, arabes, persanes et égyptiennes, Paris 2009.
Google Scholar

Europäische Schlusselwörter: wortvergleichende und wortgeschichtliche Studien, Vol. 3: Kultur und Zivilisation, München 1967.
Google Scholar

Febvre L., ‘Civilisation: Evolution of a Word and a Group of Ideas’ in P. Burke (ed.), A New Kind of History. From the Writings of Febvre, trans. by K. Folca, London 1973.
Google Scholar

Febvre L., Civilisation. Évolution d’un mot et d’un groupe d’idées, Paris 1930.
Google Scholar

Franco E., Preisendanz K. (eds.), Beyond Orientalism. The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and its Impact on Indian and Cross‑Cultural Studies, Amsterdam–Atlanta 1997.
Google Scholar

Frank D.H., Leaman O. (eds.), History of Jewish Philosophy, London–New York 1997 (Routledge History of World Philosophies, 2).
Google Scholar

Ganeri J., ‘Indian Logic’ in D. Gabbay, J. Woods (eds.), Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic, Amsterdam 2004 (Handbook of the History of Logic, 1).
Google Scholar

Gates W.E., ‘The Spread of Ibn Khaldûn’s Ideas on Climate and Culture,’ Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 28, No. 3 (1967).
Google Scholar

Halbfass W., India and Europe. An Essay in Understanding, Albany 1988.
Google Scholar

Halbfass W., Indien und Europa. Perspektiven ihrer geistigen Begegnung, Basel–Stuttgart 1981.
Google Scholar

Havens Th.R.H., Nishi Amane and Modern Japanese Thought, Princeton 1970.
Google Scholar

Hegel G.W.F., Über die unter dem Namen Bhagavad‑Gita bekannte Episode des Mahabharata von Wilhelm von Humboldt. Berlin 1826, ed. H. Herring, New Delhi 1995.
Google Scholar

Heidegger M., Was heißt Denken?, Tübingen 1954.
Google Scholar

Heidegger M., Was ist das – die Philosophie?, Pfullingen 1956.
Google Scholar

Heidegger M., What is Called Thinking?, New York 1976.
Google Scholar

Hiriyanna M., Outlines of Indian Philosophy, London 1932.
Google Scholar

Hobsbawm E., Ranger T. (eds.), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge 1983 (Past and Present Publications).
Google Scholar

Jaspers K., The Way to Wisdom. An Introduction to Philosophy, New Haven 2003.
Google Scholar

Khilnani S., The Idea of India, New Delhi 2004.
Google Scholar

Kripalani K., Literature of Modern India. A Panoramic Glimpse, New Delhi 1982.
Google Scholar

Krishna D., Indian Philosophy. A Counter Perspective, Delhi 1992.
Google Scholar

Leaman O., Nasr S.H. (eds.), History of Islamic Philosophy, London–New York 1996 (Routledge History of World Philosophies, 1).
Google Scholar

Lipczuk R., ‘Bibliografia na temat “faux amis”’ in A. Kątny, K. Hejwowski (eds.), Problemy frazeologii i leksykografii. Materiały z konferencji zorganizowanej przez Wydział Filologiczny Wszechnicy Mazurskiej, Olecko, 16‑17 czerwca 1999 rok, Olecko 2000.
Google Scholar

Losensky P., Sharma S., In the Bazaar of Love. Selected Poetry of Amir Khusrau, New Delhi 2011.
Google Scholar

Makeham J. (ed.), Dao Companion to Neo‑Confucian Philosophy, Dordrecht 2010.
Google Scholar

Maraldo J.C., ‘Contemporary Japanese Philosophy’ in B. Carr, I. Mahalingam (eds.), Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, London–New York 1997.
Google Scholar

Mehta J.L., India and the West. The Problem of Understanding, Chico, Calif. 1985.
Google Scholar

Mohanty J.M., ‘Between Indology and Indian Philosophy’ in E. Franco, K. Preisendanz (eds.), Beyond Orientalism. The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and its Impact on Indian and Cross‑Cultural Studies, Amsterdam–Atlanta 1997.
Google Scholar

Murty K.S., Philosophy in India. Traditions, Teaching and Research, Delhi 1979.
Google Scholar

Niedermann J., Kultur. Werden und Wandlungen des Begriffs und seiner Ersatz‑begriffe von Cicero bis Herder, Firenze 1941.
Google Scholar

O’Leary J.S., ‘Heidegger and Indian Philosophy’ in E. Franco, K. Preisendanz (eds.), Beyond Orientalism. The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and its Impact on Indian and Cross‑Cultural Studies, Amsterdam–Atlanta 1997.
Google Scholar

Parkes G. (ed.), Heidegger and Asian Thought, Honolulu 1987.
Google Scholar

Potter K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies, Delhi 1970.
Google Scholar

Ramos C., Introduction to Philosophy, Manila 2004.
Google Scholar

Scharfe H., Grammatical Literature in J. Gonda (ed.), A History of Indian Literature, Vol. 5, fasc. 2, Wiesbaden 1977.
Google Scholar

Scharfstein B.‑A., The Western Blindness to Non‑Western Philosophies. A paper presented at the 20th World Congress of Philosophy (Boston, Massachusetts, August 10‑15, 1998).
Google Scholar

Schimmel A., Islamic Literatures of India, in J. Gonda (ed.), A History of Indian Literature, Vol. 7, fasc. 1, Wiesbaden 1973.
Google Scholar

Serebriany S.D., ‘Philosophy as a Free Search for Knowledge: the Concept and Its Transfer to Russia and India’ in Meždunarodnaâ vostokovednaâ konferenciâ (Torčinovskie čteniâ). Metamorfozy. 22‑25 iûnâ 2011 g. Častʹ pervaâ, Sankt‑Peterburg 2013.
Google Scholar

Serebriany S.D., ‘Some Marginal Notes on [W. Halbfass’s] India and Europe’ in E. Franco, K. Preisendanz (eds.), Beyond Orientalism. The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and its Impact on Indian and Cross‑Cultural Studies, Amsterdam–Atlanta 1997.
Google Scholar

Sharma S., Amir Khusraw. Poets of Sultans and Sufis, Oxford 2005.
Google Scholar

Sharma S., Persian Poetry at the Indian Frontier: Mas’ud‑i Sa’d‑i Salmān, Delhi 2000.
Google Scholar

Steben B.D., ‘Nishi Amane and the Birth of “Philosophy” and “Chinese Philosophy” in Early Meiji Japan’ in J. Makeham (ed.), Learning to Emulate the Wise. The Genesis of Chinese Philosophy as an Academic Discipline in Twentieth‑century China, Hong Kong 2012 (Formation and Development of Academic Disciplines in Twentieth‑century China Series).
Google Scholar

Trautmann Th.R., ‘Does India Have History? Does History Have India?,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 54, No. 1 (2012), pp. 174‑205, at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417511000636>.
Google Scholar

Weimin S., ‘Chinese Logic and the Absence of Theoretical Sciences in Ancient China,’ Dao, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2009), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11712‑009‑9133‑x>.
Google Scholar

Weischedel W., Forstå filosofferne. Fra Thales til Wittgenstein, København 1997.
Google Scholar

Zimmer H., Philosophies of India, ed. J. Campbell, Princeton 1969 (1951).
Google Scholar

Serebrânyj S.D., ‘O perevodah slov «kulʹtura» i «civilizaciâ» na neevropejskie âzyki’ in Evropejskie sudʹby koncepta kulʹtury (Rossiâ, Germaniâ, Franciâ, angloâzyčnyj mir). Materialy russko‑francuzskogo kollokviuma 11‑12 oktâbrâ 2007 goda, Moskva 2011.
Google Scholar

Fajer V.V., Aleksandrijskaâ filologiâ i gomerovskij gekzametr, Moskva 2010.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-02-05

How to Cite

Serebriany, Sergei. 2016. “The Concept of ‘Indian Philosophy’ As a Product of Intercultural Dialogue (Wilhelm Halbfass’s India and Europe Revisited )”. Politeja 13 (1 (40):227-52. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.15.