The Problem of Universal Values and Intercultural Space – New /Old Predicament of Anthropology

Authors

  • Marcin Brocki Jagiellonian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.44.09

Keywords:

universalism vs. relativism, universal values, translating cultures

Abstract

The discussion over universal vs. cultural relative values hits the core of anthropological knowledge. Although cultural relativism served as an almost irrefutable basis for anthropological practice of understanding the Other, several factors of a recent origin have started to undermine the obvious. The “Arab spring,” the “Occupy” movements, the debate over female circumcision that attracts global attention, local uses of the relativistic arguments in political contexts and the debates over universality of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all of these trigger a new discourse on the universality of human values. Universality turns our attention to the problem of translatability of cultures – without an assumption that there is shared, intercultural space and a certain level of commensurability between cultures, any rapport would be impossible. The translation problem directs us toward a discussion on cross-cultural communication and the universality of values and their hierarchies. The discussion has showed that values are not constant residua within intercultural space but rather they are part of an interpretive activity of the participants of a cross-cultural interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Marcin Brocki, Jagiellonian University

Assοciate Professor and Head of the Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland). In his research he focuses on theoretical anthropology, intercultural communication, semiotics, public anthropology, anthropology of the body, and post-socialism. His recent publications include: Body language in anthropological perspective (Wrocław 2000, in Polish), Anthropology. Literature-dialogue-translation (Wrocław 2008, in Polish), Social and Cultural Anthropology in Public Space (Krakow 2013, in Polish), “Bachtin’s heritage in anthropology – alterity and dialogue,” In: Philosophy and Anthropology: Border-Crossing and Transformations, Ananta Kumar Giri and John Clammer (eds.), (London 2013), “The Late 1980s and Early 1990s in Poland as a Dynamic Process in Culture. The Question about Bifurcation,” In: Semiotics of Communications, A. Lusińska, A. Kalinowska-Żeleźnik (eds.), (Gdańsk 2015).

References

Barber, Benjamin R. 2007: Dżihad kontra McŚwiat. (Spectrum.) Transl. by Hanna Jankowska. Warszawa: Muza.
Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi K. 2010: Miejsca kultury. (Cultura.) Transl. by Tomasz Dobrogoszcz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Google Scholar

D’Andrade, Roy 2008: A Study of Personal and Cultural Values American, Japanese, and Vietnamese. (Culture, Mind, and Society.) New York/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald 1989: “The Myth of the Subjective,” in: Michael Krausz (ed.): Relativism. Interpretation and Confrontation. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 159-172.
Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, S.N. 2000: “Multiple Modernities,” Daedalus 129(1): 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290031201
Google Scholar

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland 2006: Engaging Anthropology. The Case for a Public Presence. Oxford/ New York: Berg.
Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan 1965: Theories of Primitive Religion. (Sir D. Owen Evans Lectures.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 1983: Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Gershenhorn, Jerry 2004: Melville J. Herskovits And the Racial Politics of Knowledge. (Critical Studies in the History of Anthropology.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 2004: Działanie komunikacyjne i detranscendentalizacja rozumu. (Terminus. 37.) Transl. by Wanda Lipnik. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar

Hermeking, M. 2007: “Global Internet Usage, Web Site Design, and Cultural Communication Preferences: Contributions from Cross-Cultural Marketing and Advertising Research,” in: Kirk St. Amant (ed.): Linguistic and Cultural Online Communication Issues in the Global Age. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 160–176. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-213-8.ch011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-213-8.ch011
Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 2008: Zderzenie cywilizacji i nowy kształt ładu światowego. (Spectrum.) Transl. by Hanna Jankowska. Warszawa: Muza.
Google Scholar

Kluckhohn, Clyde 1949: Mirror for Man. The Relation of Anthropology to Modern Life. New York: Whittlesey House.
Google Scholar

Kuligowski, Paweł 2011: Przyszłość jest katastrofą. Szkice z filozofii kultury. Wrocław: Atut.
Google Scholar

Leach, Edmund R. 1973: “Ourselves and Others,” Times Literary Supplement July 6: 771-772.
Google Scholar

Leach, Edmund R. 1982: Social Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Lull, James 2001: “Superculture for the Communication Age,” in: Idem (ed.): Culture in the Communication Age. (Comedia.) London: Routledge, pp. 132–163.
Google Scholar

Peacock, James L. 2001: The Anthropological Lens. Harsh Light, Soft Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164924
Google Scholar

Pieterse, Jan Nederveen 2009: Globalization and Culture. Global Mélange. (Globalization.) Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar

Salzmann, Zdeněk 2012: “Cross-Cultural (Interethnic) Communication Reconsidered,” Studia Ethnologica Pragensia 1: 29–37.
Google Scholar

Schwartz, Shalom H.; Bardi, Anat 2001: “Value Hierarchies Across Cultures Taking a Similarities Perspective,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(3): 268–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
Google Scholar

Schweizer, Thomas 1998: “Epistemology. The Nature and Validation of Anthropological Knowledge,” in: H. Russell Bernard (ed.): Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology.
Google Scholar

Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira Press, pp. 39-88.
Google Scholar

Shin, Sarah 2011: Slavoj Žižek at Occupy Wall Street: “We Are Not Dreamers, We Are the Awakening from a Dream Which Is Turning into a Nightmare.” Versobooks.com. Available under <http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/736-slavoj-zizek-at-occupy-wall-street-we-are-notdreamers-we-are-the-awakening-from-a-dream-which-is-turning-into-a-nightmare> (accessed on April 17, 2013).
Google Scholar

Tambiah, Stanley J. 1990: Magic, Science and Religion and the Scope of Rationality. (Lewis Henry Morgan Lectures.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Torop, Peeter 2000: “Intersemiosis and Intersemiotic Translation,” European Journal for Semiotic Studies 12(1): 71–100.
Google Scholar

Tyler, Stephen A. 1987: The Unspeakable. Discourse, Dialogue, and Rhetoric in the Postmodern World. (Rhetoric of the Human Sciences.) Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-10-18

How to Cite

Brocki, Marcin. 2016. “The Problem of Universal Values and Intercultural Space – New /Old Predicament of Anthropology”. Politeja 13 (5 (44):131-41. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.44.09.