Doktryna władzy monarszej Jakuba VI (I) Stuarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.39.02Keywords:
James I, divine right of kingsAbstract
James I Stuart’s theory of the divine right of kings
The author presents King James I Stuart’s theory of the divine right of kings as the modification of Bodin’s concept of the sovereignty. According to King James, a monarch is subjected to no earthly authority, as he derives his right to rule directly from the will of God. The king is thus not a subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate of the realm, including the Church. This doctrine implies that any attempt to depose a king or to restrict his power is contrary to the will of God and may constitute treason. The author argues, that the theory of the divine right of kings is rooted in the medieval idea that God had bestowed earthly power to the king, just as He had given spiritual power and authority to the Church, centering on a pope and in this way in protestant kingdoms may justifies the king’s absolute authority in both political and spiritual matters. The author points out that it is contrary to Bodin’s theory of sovereignty and he argues that King James’ general statements of divine right should not be read as claims about specific royal powers in any particular kingdom. Unlike the theorists of absolutism, King James thus believed the king to be bound to exercise his authority through defined constitutional channels. Such a requirement went beyond that expected of the absolute monarch, who was to rule well if he were to avoid the charge of tyranny. Finally the author argues, that King James’ theory of power is the attempt of the restoration of Christian uniformity and of the re‑Christianization of Bodin’s concept of the sovereignty.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Andrew E., Jean Bodin on Sovereignty, „Republics of Letters. A Journal for the Study of Knowledge, Politics, and the Arts” 2011, Vol. 2, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Bingham C., The Making of a King. The Early Years of James VI and I, Garden City, N.Y. 1968.
Google Scholar
Bodin J., Sześć ksiąg o Rzeczypospolitej, I, VIII, wstęp Z. Izdebski, Warszawa 1958.
Google Scholar
Buchanan G., De Jure Regni Apud Scotos, or, A Dialogue, Concerning the Due Privilege of Government, in the Kingdom of Scotland, Betwixt George Buchanan and Thomas Maitland, Philadephia 1766.
Google Scholar
Buchanan G., A Dialogue on the Law of Kingship Among the Scots. De Jure Regni Apud Scotos Dialogus, przeł. i red. M.S. Smith, R.A. Mason, wstęp R.A. Mason, Edinburgh 2006, St. Andrews Studies in Reformation History.
Google Scholar
Burgess G., Common Law and Political Theory in Early Stuart England, „Political Science” 1988, Vol. 40, nr 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003231878804000102
Google Scholar
Burgess G., Festenstein M. (red.), English Radicalism, 1550‑1850, Cambridge–New York 2007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495762
Google Scholar
Bush M.L., The Act of Proclamations. A Reinterpretation, „The American Journal of Legal History” 1983, Vol. 27, nr 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/844912
Google Scholar
Croft P., King James, New York 2003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-9017-4
Google Scholar
Daly J., Cosmic Harmony and Political Thinking in Early Stuart England, Philadelphia 1979, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 69, pt. 7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1006155
Google Scholar
Dickinson W.C., Donaldson G., Milne I.A. (red.), Source Book of Scottish History, Vol. 3: From 1567 to 1707, London 1954.
Google Scholar
Dod J., Cleaver R., A Godly Form of Household Government, for the Ordering of Private Families, London 1598.
Google Scholar
Dunning W.A., Jean Bodin on Sovereignty, „Political Science Quarterly” 1896, Vol. 11, nr 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2139603
Google Scholar
Elazar D.J., Kincaid J. (red.), The Covenant Connection. From Federal Theology to Modern Federalism, Lanham 2000.
Google Scholar
Elton G.R., Henry VIII’s Act of Proclamations, „The English Historical Review” 1960, Vol. 75, nr 295.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/LXXV.295.208
Google Scholar
Figgis J.N., The Theory of the Divine Right of Kings, Cambridge 1896, Cambridge Historical Essays, nr 9.
Google Scholar
Filmer R., Patriarcha and Other Political Works, red. P. Laslett, Oxford 1949, Blackwell’s Political Texts.
Google Scholar
Foster E.R. (red.), Proceedings in Parliament, 1610, New Haven 1966, Yale Historical Publications. Manuscripts and Edited Texts, 22‑23.
Google Scholar
Franklin J.H., Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory, Cambridge 1973, Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics.
Google Scholar
Geneva Bible, London 1955.
Google Scholar
Gough J.W., Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History, Oxford 1955.
Google Scholar
Greenleaf W.H., James I and the Divine Right of Kings’, „Political Studies” 1957, Vol. 5, nr 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1957.tb00858.x
Google Scholar
Ha P., English Presbyterianism, 1590‑1640, Stanford 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804759878.001.0001
Google Scholar
Heal F., O’Day R. (red.), Church and Society in England. Henry VIII to James I, Hamden 1977.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15737-2
Google Scholar
Hill C., The Century Revolution, 1603‑1714, Edinburgh 1961.
Google Scholar
Hill C., The World Turned Upside Down. Radical Ideas during the English Revolution, London 1973.
Google Scholar
Inuzuka H., Absolutism in the History of Political Thought. The Case of King James VI and I, „Political Science” 2007, Vol. 14.
Google Scholar
James VI, A Meditation upon the xxv, xxvi, xxvii, xxviii and xxix verses of the XV Chapter of the First Booke of the Chronicles of the Kings, New York 1971.
Google Scholar
Jakub VI Stuart, Βασιλικὸν Δῶρον albo Wskazówki Jego Królewskiej Mości dla swego ukochanego syna Henryka, księcia, wstęp, przeł. i oprac. M. Misztal, Kraków 2006, Literatura Parenetyczna przez Wieki.
Google Scholar
Jellinek J., Ogólna nauka o państwie, ks. 2‑3, przeł. M. Balsigierowa, M. Przedborski, Warszawa 1924.
Google Scholar
Knox J., History of the Reformation in Scotland, Glasgow 1841.
Google Scholar
Knox J., On Rebellion, red. R.A. Mason, Cambridge–New York 1994, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought.
Google Scholar
Laski H.J., The Political Ideas of James I, „Political Science Quarterly” 1919, Vol. 34, nr 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2141439
Google Scholar
Lee M. Jr., Great Britain’s Solomon. James VI and I in His Three Kingdoms, Urbana 1990.
Google Scholar
Locke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, przeł., wstęp i koment. Z. Rau, Warszawa 1992, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
Google Scholar
M’Crie T., John Knox. Containing Illustrations of the History of the Reformation in Scotland, Edinburgh 1831.
Google Scholar
Mason R.A. (red.), Scots and Britons. Scottish Political Thought and the Union of 1603, Cambridge 1994.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558542
Google Scholar
McFarlane I.D., Buchanan, London 1981.
Google Scholar
McIlwain C.H., The High Court of Parliament and its Supremacy. An Historical Essay on the Boundaries between Legislation and Adjudication in England, New Haven 1910.
Google Scholar
Mocket R., God and the King, or, A Dialogue, Shewing That Our Soveraign Lord the King of England, Being Immediate under God within His Dominions, Doth Rightly Claim Whatsoever is Required by the Oath of Allegiance, London 1633.
Google Scholar
Mondi M., The Speeches and Self‑Fashioning of King James VI and I to the English Parliament, 1604‑1624, „Constructing the Past” 2007, Vol. 8, nr 1.
Google Scholar
Morgan E.S. (red.), Puritan Political Ideas, 1558‑1794, Indianapolis 2003.
Google Scholar
Mullan D.G., Scottish Puritanism, 1590‑1638, Oxford–New York 2000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198269978.001.0001
Google Scholar
Oakley F., Jacobean Political Theology. The Absolute and Ordinary Powers of the King, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 1968, Vol. 29, nr 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2708446
Google Scholar
Peck L.L. (red.), The Mental World of the Jacobean Court, Cambridge–New York 1991.
Google Scholar
The Political Works of James I, wstęp C.H. McIlwain, Cambridge 1918, Harvard Political Classics, Vol. 1.
Google Scholar
Ponet J., A Short Treatise on Political Power, and of the True Obedience which Subjects our to Kings and Other Civil Governors, with an Exhortation to All True and Natural English Men (reprint), New York 1972.
Google Scholar
Ram R., The Countrymens Catechusme, or, A Helpe for Householders, London 1655.
Google Scholar
Salmon J.H.M., Renaissance and Revolt. Essays in the Intellectual and Social History of Early Modern France, Cambridge 2003.
Google Scholar
Schochet G.J., The Authoritarian Family and Political Attitudes in 17th‑Century England. Patriarchalism in Political Thought, New Brunswick 1988.
Google Scholar
Scott J.B., The Catholic Conception of International Law. Francisco de Vitoria, Founder of the Modern Law of Nations, Francisco Suárez, Founder of the Modern Philosophy of Law in General and in Particular of the Law of Nations. A Critical Examination and a Justified Appreciation, Washington D.C. 1934.
Google Scholar
Short Questions and Answeres, Contayning the Summe of Christian Religion, London 1614.
Google Scholar
Skinner Q., The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vol. 2: The Age of Reformation, Cambridge 1978.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817892
Google Scholar
Sommerville J.P., English and European Political Ideas in the Early Seventeenth Century. Revisionism and the Case of Absolutism, „Journal of British Studies” 1996, Vol. 35, nr 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/386103
Google Scholar
Szlachta B., Konstytucjonalizm czy absolutyzm? Szkice z francuskiej myśli politycznej XVI wieku, Kraków 2005, Biblioteka Myśli Politycznej – Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej, 43.
Google Scholar
Tanner J.R., English Constitutional Conflicts of the Seventeenth Century, 1603‑1689, Cambridge 1928.
Google Scholar
Usher R.G., James I and Sir Edward Coke, „The English Historical Review” 1903, Vol. 18, nr 72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/XVIII.LXXII.664
Google Scholar
Vos J.G., The Scottish Covenanters. Their Origins, History and Distinctive Doctrines, Edinburgh 1995.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
