Kelsen’s Idea of a World State (Weltstaat)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.72.09Keywords:
Kelsen, international law, world state, Weltstaat, pure science of law, pure theory of lawAbstract
This article offers an analysis of the meaning of the term ‘world state’ (Weltstaat) as used by Hans Kelsen in his work on international legal theory. The author argues that Kelsen understands the term solely as a legal concept. Reconstruction of Kelsen’s understanding of the notion of world state begins with a summary of Kelsen’s reductionist doctrine of the state and its identity with law. Secondly, the analysis moves to Kelsen’s radical deconstruction of sovereignty. Thirdly, Kelsen’s doctrine of evolution of legal orders along the axis of centralization is considered. These considerations lead to the assertion that Kelsen’s Weltstaat shows in fact more affinity with the concept of the international community rather than a fully-fledged state. The article concludes that Kelsen’s world state is only a theoretical possibility, a stage in the evolution of legal orders and a common point of imputation rather than a manifestation of any cosmopolitan agenda.
Downloads
References
Bernstorff J. von, “Hans Kelsen on Judicial Law-Making by International Courts and Tribunals: A Theory of Global Judicial Imperialism?”, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, vol. 14 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341284
Bernstorff J. von, The Public International Law Theory of Hans Kelsen. Believing in Universal Law, transl. by T. Dunlap, New York 2010.
Bull H., “Hans Kelsen and International Law”, in. R. Tur, W. Twining (eds), Essays on Kelsen, Oxford 1986.
Carty A., “The Continuing Influence of Kelsen on the General Perception of the Discipline of International Law”, European Journal of International Law, vol. 9 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.2.344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.2.344
Górnisiewicz A., Wojna i nomos. Carl Schmitt o problemie porządku światowego, Kraków 2019.
Hardt M., Negri A., Empire, London 2001, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrw54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrw54
Hart H.L.A., The Concept of Law, Oxford 1994.
Kelsen H., “Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre”, Tübingen 1920, in M. Jestaedt (ed.), Hans Kelsen Werke. Bd. 4, Veröffentlichte Schriften 1918–1920, Tübingen 2013.
Kelsen H., General Theory of Law and State, transl. by A. Wedberg, Clark 2011.
Kelsen H., “International Peace – By Court or Government?”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 46, no. 4 (1941), https://doi.org/10.1086/218699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/218699
Kelsen H., “Law, State and Justice in the Pure Theory of Law”, Yale Law Journal, vol. 57 (1947-1948)..
Kelsen H., Law and Peace in International Relations. The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures, 1940-41, Cambridge 1942, Buffalo 1997, https://doi.org/10.2307/793234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/793234
Kelsen H., Peace Through Law, Chapel Hill 1944.
Kelsen H., Principles of International Law, New York 1952.
Kelsen H., Pure Theory of Law, transl. by M. Knight, Clark 2005.
Kelsen H., Reine Rechtslehre, Wien 1960 (1992).
Kelsen H., “Souveränität”, in Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts. Bd. 3, Berlin 1962.
Kelsen H., “Sovereignty and International Law”, Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 48, no. 4 (1960).
Kelsen H., The Legal Process and International Order, London 1934, pkt. VI.
Kelsen H., “The Strategy of Peace”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 5 (1944), https://doi.org/10.1086/219453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/219453
Langford P., Bryan I., “Hans Kelsen’s Concept of Normative Imputation”, Ratio Juris, vol. 26, no. 1 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12004
Leben C., “Hans Kelsen and the Advancement of International Law”, European Journal of International Law, vol. 9 (1998). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.2.287
Onuf N.G., “Civitas Maxima: Wolff, Vattel and the Fate of Republicanism”, American Journal of International Law, vol. 88, no. 2 (1994), https://doi.org/10.2307/2203730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2204100
Schmitt C., Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, transl. by G. Schwab, Chicago–London 2005, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738901.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738901.001.0001
Schmitt C., The Concept of the Political, transl. by G. Schwab, Chicago–London 2007, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738840.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738840.001.0001
Verdross A., Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft, Vienna 1926.
Widłak T., “From Vladimiri’s Just War to Kelsen’s Lawful War: The Universality of the ‘Bellum Justum’ Doctrine”, Studia Philosophiae Christianae, vol. 53, no. 3 (2017), https://doi.org/10.21697/2017.53.3.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/2017.53.3.04
Widłak T., From International Society to International Community. On the Constitutional Evolution of International Law, Gdańsk 2015.
Widłak T., Teoria i filozofia prawa międzynarodowego Hansa Kelsena, Gdańsk 2018.
Wolff C. von, “Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum”, in C. Brown, T. Nardin, N. Rengger (eds.), International Relations in Political Thought: Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War, New York 2002.
Zalewska M., “Causality and Imputation (Kelsen)”, Sellers M., Kirste S. (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Dordrecht 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_220-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_220-1
Zolo D., “Hans Kelsen: International Peace through International Law”, European Journal of International Law, vol. 9 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.2.306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.2.306
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
