Did COP26 Lapse or Not Lapse the Core Objective of the UNFCCC Under the Paris Agreement-carbon markets?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.92.10Keywords:
climate change, COP26, carbon marke, UNFCCC, negotiationsAbstract
It is widely believed that there is academic literature addressing the United Nations Climate Summit, but there is no systematic review and analysis of research on COP26 and its objectives under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. This article describes a qualitative meta-synthesis of research on COP26 that examines the extent to which evidence exists for changes in reducing greenhouse gases as a core objective of the UNFCCC. A systematic analysis and synthesis of various studies have shown that Article 6.2 (not lapsed) has undergone a significant change in relation to the core objective of the UNFCCC under the market-based approach. Several studies have found that Article 6.4 (lapsed) has hardly changed under a marketbased approach. The results for Article 6.8 under non-market-based approaches (lapsed) were similar, although COP26 did not have the opportunity to provide “Just Change Evidence”. The article concludes by identifying gaps in scientific research and suggesting additional scientific work to increase the availability of evidence for non-market approaches.
Downloads
References
Aktar M., Alam M., Al-Amin A., “Global Economic Crisis, Energy Use, CO2 Emissions, and Policy Roadmap Amid COVID-19,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 26 (2021), pp. 770-781, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.029
Aldy J., Stavins R., “Climate Negotiators Create an Opportunity for Scholars,” Science, vol. 337, no. 6098 (2012), pp. 1043-1044, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223836
Andresen S., “The Paris Agreement and Its Rulebook in a Problem-Solving Perspective,” Climate Law, vol. 9, no. 1-2 (2019), pp. 122-136, https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00901007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00901007
Annette L., “COP26: Reflections on the Power of Science as a Force Against Climate Change,” Impact, no. 1 (2022), pp. 4-5, https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2022.1.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2022.1.4
Arora N.K., Mishra I., “COP26: More Challenges than Achievements,” Environmental Sustainability, vol. 4 (2021), pp. 585-588, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00212-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00212-7
“Article 6: What is it and why is it Important?,” International Chamber of Commerce, 18 July 2019, at https://iccwbo.org/media-wall/news-speeches/article-6-important/.
Asadnabizadeh M., “Analysis of Internal Factors of the Swing States in the International Climate Change Negotiations: A Case study of Poland in COP24,” American Journal of Climate Change, vol. 8 no. 2 (2019), pp. 263-283. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2019.82015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2019.82015
Asadnabizadeh M., “Bump in the Road to Global Energy Transition: The Bottlenecks of the Carbon Markets,” Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne, vol. 79 (2023), pp. 90-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/athena.2023.79.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2023.79.05
Asadnabizadeh M., “Climate Change in the Foreign Policy of the Trump Administration,” Environmental Policy and Law, vol. 49, no. 2-3 (2019), pp. 195-202. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-190157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-190157
Asadnabizadeh M., “Critical Findings of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for Global Climate Change Policymaking a Summary for Policymakers (SPM) Analysis,” International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, vol 15, no. 5 (2023), pp. 652-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2022-0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2022-0049
Asadnabizadeh M., “Development of UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Negotiations under COP25: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement Perspective,” Open Political Science, vol. 2, no. 1 (2019), pp. 113-119, https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2019-0012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2019-0012
Asadnabizadeh M., “Did the Glasgow COP26 Negotiations Meet or Miss Article 6 (Carbon Markets) of the Paris Agreement? A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Politics & Policy, vol. 52, no. 4 (2024), pp. 757-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12621
Asadnabizadeh M., “The Failure of Deep Decarbonising of Europe (DDE) by 2050 in Line with the Paris Agreement: a Losing Player Analysis,” International Journal of Global Energy Issues, vol. 43, no. 5/6 (2021), pp. 522-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijgei.2021.118928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2021.10042556
Asadnabizadeh M. “Status of Impacts of Extreme Climate Events at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP25),” International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts & Responses, vol. 13, no 1 (2020), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v13i01/1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v13i01/1-11
Asadnabizadeh M., “US President Joe Biden’s Administration: A New U.S. Climate Change Agenda (U.S. CCA),” Journal of Politics and Law, vol. 14, no. 3 (2021), pp. 124-137. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v14n3p124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v14n3p124
Asadnabizadeh M., Moe E., “A Review of Global Carbon Markets from Kyoto to Paris and beyond: The persistent failure of implementation,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 12 (2024), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1368105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1368105
Barouki R. et al., “Addendum to: ‘The COVID-19 pandemic and global environmental change: Emerging research needs’. Environ. Int. 146 (2021) 106272.” Environment International, vol. 152 (2021), pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106491
Behr P. et al., “Rethinking voluntary carbon credit markets and the EU ETS: A critical review,” Discussion Papers In Business And Economics, Discussion Paper no. 22, June 2022, at https://fuldok.hs-fulda.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/960/file/Discussion+Paper+No+22+V.
Blum M., “The Legitimation of Contested Carbon Markets after Paris – Empirical Insights from Market Stakeholders,” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 22, no. 2 (2020), pp. 226-238, https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1697658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1697658
Broom D., “Climate Change: What is COP26 and why does it Matter?,” World Economic Forum 10 May 2021, at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/03/cop26-un-climate-change-summit/.
Bryden D. et al., “COP26: What is it and why is it Important?,” Travers Smith, 1 April 2021, https://www.traverssmith.com/knowledge/knowledge-container/cop26-what-is-itand-why-is-it-important/.
Cadman T., Sarker T., De Gruyter Handbook of Sustainable Development and Finance, Berlin 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733488
Camba A., “Inter-State Relations and State Capacity: The Rise and Fall of Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the Philippines,” Palgrave Communications, vol. 3, no. 1 (2017), pp. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0033-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0033-0
Capoor K., Ambrosi P., State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008, Washington 2008, at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/13405/44607.pdf ?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Clarke B. et al., “Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy,” Topoi, vol. 33, no. 2 (2013), pp. 339-360, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9220-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9220-9
“COP 19,” United Nations Climate Change, 11-12 November 2013, at https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/past-conferences/warsaw-climate-change-conference-november-2013/cop-19.
“COP 20 Outcomes and Critiques,” African Climate & Development Institute, 23 December 2014, at http://www.acdi.uct.ac.za/acdi/news/cop-20-outcomes-and-critiques.
“COP22 Summary Report. Marrakech,” International Emissions Trading Association, 20 November 2016, at https://www.ieta.org/resources/UNFCCC/COP22/COP22WRAP_FINAL.pdf.
“COP24: UN Climate Change Conference, what’s at Stake and What You Need to Know?,” United Nations News, 29 November 2018, at https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/11/1026851.
“COP25 to be the Launchpad for Significantly more Climate Ambition,” United
Nations Climate Change, 29 November 2019, at https://unfccc.int/news/cop25-to-be-the-launchpad-for-significantly-more-climate-ambition-0.
Daggash H.A., Dowell N.M., “Higher Carbon Prices on Emissions Alone will not Deliver the Paris Agreement,” Joule, vol. 3, no. 9 (2019), pp. 2120-2133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.008
Dagnet Y. et al., “INSIDER: 4 Key Topics Climate Negotiators Must Resolve by COP26,”.
World Resources Institute, 11 December 2020, at https://www.wri.org/insights/insider-4-key-topics-climate-negotiators-must-resolve-cop26.
Deheza M. et al., “COP22 in Marrakech: A Push for Accelerated Action by 2018,” Institute for Climate Economics Climate Brief, no. 43 (2016).
DellaSala D.A., Goldstein M.I., Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, 1st edition, Oxford 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.10536-1
Depledge J., Saldivia M., Peñasco C., “Glass Half Full or Glass Half Empty? The 2021 Glasgow Climate Conference,” Climate Policy, vol. 22, no. 2 (2022), pp. 147-157, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2038482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2038482
“Dictionary of Psychology,” American Psychological Association, at https://dictionary.apa.org/state-orientation.
Dröge S., Rattani V., “After the Katowice Climate Summit: Building Blocks for the EU Climate Agenda,” Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit, no. 9 (2019), pp. 1-7,https://doi.org/10.18449/2019C09.
Evans S., Wu A.Z., “What Drives Cooperation in Carbon Markets? Lessons from Decision-Makers in the Australia-EU ETS Linking Negotiations,” Climate Policy, vol. 21, no. 8 (2021), pp. 1086-1098, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1953436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1953436
“Fact Sheet: The Need for Mitigation,” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, November 2009, at https://unfccc.int/files/press/backgrounders/application/pdf/press_factsh_mitigation.
Farand C., “UK Negotiator: Countries must Resolve Carbon Market Dispute to Step up Ambition,” Climate Home News, 29 October 2020, at https://www.climatechangenews.com/2020/10/29/uk-negotiator-countries-must-resolve-carbon-market-dispute-stepambition/.
Flemming K., Noyes J., “Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Where are We at?,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 20 (2021), pp. 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276
Frank S., “The Lengthened and Stony Road to Glasgow,” Carbon Market Watch, 28 January 2021, at https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2021/01/28/the-lengthened-and-stony-road-to-glasgow/.
Gao Y., Gao X., Zhang X., “The 2 °C Global Temperature Target and the Evolution of the Long-Term Goal of Addressing Climate Change – from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Paris Agreement,” Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2 (2017), pp. 272-278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.01.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.01.022
Green E., “Voluntary Carbon Offsets ‘Need New Oversight Body’,” Argus, 27 January 2021, at https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2181175-voluntary-carbon-offsets-need-new-oversight-body.
Green J.F., “Don’t Link Carbon Markets,” Nature, vol. 543 (2017), pp. 484-486, https://doi.org/10.1038/543484a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/543484a
Greening P., Strachan E., “COP26 and Creating a Center for Carbon Trading,” mondaq, 15 November 2021, at https://www.mondaq.com/climate-change/1131200/.
Greiner S. et al., Moving Towards Next Generation Carbon Markets: Observations from Article 6 Pilots, Freiburg 2019, at https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/175360/1/ZORA17360.pdf.
Greiner S. et al., “COP26 Digest: The Significance of “Article 6 and CDM Transition Outcomes for Africa,” Climate Focus, May 2022, at https://climatefocus.com/publications/cop2-6-digest-significance-article-6-and-cdm-transition-outcomes-africa/, 31 XII 2024.
Grimston M.C. et al., “The European and Global Potential of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Tackling Climate Change,” Climate Policy, vol. 1, no. 2 (2001), pp. 155-171, https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2001.0120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-3062(01)00002-X
Hales R., Mackey B., “The Ultimate Guide to why the COP26 Summit Ended in Failure and Disappointment (Despite a Few Bright Spots),” The Conversation, 14 November 2021, at https://theconversation.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-why-the-cop26-summit-ended-infailure-and-disappointment-despite-a-few-bright-spots-171723.
Harsh S., Clarke D., “Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 79, no. 1 (2009), pp. 395-430, https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349
History of UN Climate Talks,” Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, at https://www.c2es.org/content/history-of-un-climate-talks/.
Hone D., “Article 6 at COP26,” Shell Climate Change, 11 October 2021, at https://blogs.shell.com/2021/10/11/article-6-at-cop26/.
Jackson P., “From Stockholm to Kyoto: A Brief History of Climate Change,” United Nations, 1 June 2007, at https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/stockholm-kyoto-brief-historyclimate-change.
Jennings A., “The Movement to Replace Neoliberalism Has Lost a Battle, But We Can Still Win the War,” Global Policy, 25 February 2020, at https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/25/02/2020/movement-replace-neoliberalism-has-lost-battle-we-can-still-win-war.
Jones N., “Highs and Lows from COP20: The Twentieth UNFCCC Climate Change Negotiations in Review,” Youth Policy Labs, at https://www.youthpolicy.org/articles/participation-global-governance/cop20-in-review, 31 XII 2024.
Kelley K., Levin K., Rambharos M., “What You Need to Know about Article 6 of the Paris Agreement,” World Resources Institute, 2 December 2019, at https://www.wri.org/insights/what-you-need-know-about-article-6-paris-agreement.
Knaepen H., “COP25: The Eternal Challenge of Competing Interests,” ecdpm, 16 December 2019, at https://ecdpm.org/talking-points/cop25-eternal-challenge-competing-interests/.
Kreibich N., Hermwille L., “Caught in Between: Credibility and Feasibility of the Voluntary Carbon Market Post-2020,” Climate Policy, vol. 21, no. 7 (2021), pp. 939-957, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384
“Learning for Sustainability: COP26,” Youth Link Scotland, at https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/learning-forsustainabilitycop26overview-250374091/250374091, 31 XII 2024.
Lewis M., “The COP that was not – Will Postponing COP26 Affect Global Climate Action?,” Investors’ Corner, at https://hub.ipe.com/asset-manager/bnp-paribas-asset-management/the-cop-that-was-not-will-postponing-cop26-affect-global-climate-action/10049851.supplierarticle,31 XII 2024.
Masood E., Tollefson J., “«COP26 hasn’t Solved the Problem»: Scientists React to UN Climate Deal,” Nature, vol. 599 (2021), pp. 355-356, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03431-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03431-4
Mohan A. et al., „UNFCCC Must Confront the Political Economy of Net-Negative Emissions,” One Earth, vol. 4, no. 10 (2021), pp. 1348-1351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.001
Moosmann L. et al., International Climate Negotiations: Issues at Stake in View of the COP25UN Climate Change Conference in Madrid, ENVI Committee, at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/642344/IPOL_STU(2019)642344_EN.pdf,31 XII 2024.
Mountford H. et al., “COP26: Key Outcomes from the UN Climate Talks in Glasgow,” World Resources Institute, 17 November 2021, at https://www.wri.org/insights/cop26-key-outcomes-un-climate-talks-glasgow?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=socialmedia.
Murphy D. et al., “A Systematic Review and MetaSynthesis of Qualitative Research into Mandatory Personal Psychotherapy during Training,” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, vol. 18, no. 2 (2018), pp. 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12162
Newell P., Taylor O., “Fiddling while the Planet Burns? COP25 in Perspective,” Globalizations, vol. 17, no. 4 (2020), pp. 580-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1726127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1726127
Nhamo G., “UNFCCC Decision on Agriculture: Africa Must Continue Prioritising Adaptation in the Talanoa Dialogue and (I)NDC Processes,” South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 3 (2018), pp. 281-299, https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2018.1522275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2018.1522275
“November Editorial: A Bad Deal or no Deal at COP26?,” Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment, 26 November 2021, at http://resp.llas.ac.cn/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/342298.
O’Neill S., “COP26: Some Progress, But Nations Still Fiddling while World Warms,” Engineering, vol. 11 (2022), pp. 6-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.02.004
Obergassel W. et al., “Turning Point Glasgow? An Assessment of the Climate Conference COP26,” Carbon & Climate Law Review, vol. 15, no. 4 (2021), pp. 271-281, https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/4/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/4/4
Obergassel W. et al., “Climate Diplomacy on Hold, But not Climate Change: An Analysis of International Climate Policy in the Year of the Pandemic,” Carbon & Climate Law Review, vol. 15, no. 3 (2021), pp. 211-220, https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/3/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/3/4
Obergassel W. et al. „COP25 in Search of Lost Time for Action: An Assessment of the Madrid Climate Conference,” Carbon & Climate Law Review, vol. 14, no. 1 (2020), pp. 3-17, https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2020/1/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2020/1/4
Obergassel W., Hermwille L., Oberthür S., “Harnessing International Climate Governance to Drive a Sustainable Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Climate Policy, vol. 21, no. 10 (2021), pp. 1298-1306, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1835603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1835603
Operationalizing Article 6 of the Paris Agreement: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), United Kingdom 2017, at https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=1b-491f68d68c6670e286533538e738cd2142590d7f60fdbd610e83a34cd807a7JmltdHM9MTczNzUwNDAwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=02839a5a-065f-6c32-137c-8ac507466d64&psq=Operationalizing+Article+6+of+the+Paris+Agreement%3a+European+Bank+for+Reconstruction+and+De+velopment+(EBRD)%2c+United+Kingdom+2017&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZWJyZC5jb20vc2l0ZXMvU2F0ZWxsaXRlP-2M9Q29udGVudCZjaWQ9MTM5NTI4NjgyNDk0NCZwYWdlbmFtZT1FQlJEJTJGQ29udGVudCUyRkRvd25sb2FkRG9jdW1lbnQ&ntb=1, 31 XII 2024.
“Outcomes of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Durban, South Africa: Seventeenth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 17) and Seventh Session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 7): November 28-December 11 2011,” The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2011, at https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2011/12/outcomes-of-the-un-climate-change-conference-in-durban.pdf.
“Outcomes of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Warsaw: Nineteenth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 19): November 11-22 2013,” The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2013, at https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2013/11/outcomes-of-the-u-n-climatechange-conference-in-warsaw.pdf.
“The Paris Agreement and Paris Rulebook,” The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2020, at https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/landing-the-paris-climate-agreementhow-it-happened-why-it-matters-and-what-comes-next/, 31 XII 2024.
“Paris Climate Agreement Q&A,” Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, February 2021, at https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2021/02/paris-climate-agreement-qa.pdf.
Persico G., “Non-Market Approaches Under Article 6 PA: Yet to be Defined,” Italian Climate Network, 4 November 2022, at https://www.italiaclima.org/en/cop26-non-market-approaches/.
Poulopoulos S., Inglezakis V., Environment and Development: Basic Principles, Human Activities, and Environmental Implications, 1st edition, Amsterdam 2016.
Puig D., Roberts E., Loss and Damage at COP26, DTU Library 2021, at https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/loss-and-damage-at-cop26/fingerprints/.
Rabe B.G., “Beyond Kyoto: Climate Change Policy in Multilevel Governance Systems,” Governance, vol. 20, no. 3 (2007), pp. 423-444, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00365.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00365.x
Rajamani L., Bodansky D., “The Paris Rulebook: Balancing International Prescriptiveness with National Discretion,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 4 (2019), pp. 1023-1040, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589319000320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000320
“Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on its Forty-Fourth Session, Held in Bonn from 16 to 26 May 2016,” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 27 July 2016, at https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2016/sbsta/eng/02.pdf.
“Research Guides: Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper,” USC Libraries, at https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/methodology.
Rogelj J. et al., 2016. “Paris Agreement Climate Proposals Need a Boost to Keep Warming Well Below 2 °C,” Nature, vol. 534 (2016), pp. 631-639, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
Rogelj J. et al., “Emission Pathways Consistent with a 2 °C Global Temperature Limit,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 1, no. 8 (2011), pp. 413-418, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258
Schleussner C.-F. et al., “Science and Policy Characteristics of the Paris Agreement Temperature Goal,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, no. 9 (2016), pp. 827-835, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3096
Seo S.N., “Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate Change Policy Negotiations and Future Directions,” Regional Science Policy & Practice, vol. 9, no. 2 (2017), pp. 121-141, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3111175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12090
Shockley K., “Sustainable Development Goals and Nationally Determined Contributions: The Poor Fit between Agent-Dependent and Agent-Independent Policy Instruments,” Journal of Global Ethics, vol. 14, no. 3 (2018), pp. 369-386, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1569087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1569087
Snyder H., “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines,”Journal of Business Research, vol. 104 (2019), pp. 333-339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stages of Climate Change Negotiations, 2021, at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/infographic/climate-negotiations-timeline/index_en.html, 31 XII 2024.
Steinebach Y., Limberg J., “Implementing Market Mechanisms in the Paris Era: The Importance of Bureaucratic Capacity Building for International Climate Policy,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 29, no. 7 (2021), pp. 1153-1168, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1925330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1925330
Streck C. et al., “The Durban Climate Conference between Success and Frustration,” Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, vol. 9, no. 2 (2012), pp. 201-221, https://doi.org/10.1163/187601012x639853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187601012X639853
Streck C., von Unger M., Greiner S., “Cop 25: Losing Sight of (Raising) Ambition,” Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, vol. 17, no. 2 (2020), pp. 136-160, https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01702003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01702003
Streck Ch., Greiner S., “COP23 – Fiji/Bonn – Progress in Two Zones,” Climate Focus, January 2018, at https://climatefocus.com/publications/cop23-fijibonn-progress-two-zones/, 31 XII 2024.
Timperley J., “COP23: Key Outcomes Agreed at the UN Climate Talks in Bonn,” Carbon Brief, 19 November 2017, at https://www.carbonbrief.org/cop23-key-outcomes-agreed-un-climate-talks-bonn.
“UK to Host 2021 UN Climate Summit, COP26,” Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit, 2021. https://eciu.net/analysis/briefings/international-perspectives/cop-26.
“UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) at the SEC – Glasgow 2021,” 2021, at https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20230401054904/https://ukcop26.org/, 31 XII 2024.
“UN Climate Talks: 1992-2023,” Council on Foreign Relations, at https://www.cfr.org/timeline/un-climate-talks.
“Uniting on Climate,” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2007, at https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/unitingonclimate_eng.pdf.
Vetter D., “Climate Change Experts: Here’s why a Virtual COP26 won’t Work,” Forbes, 8 April 2020, at https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidrvetter/2020/04/08/climate-change-experts-heres-why-a-virtual-cop26-wont-work/?sh=4a6811074ec5.
Victor D.G., The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming, 1st edition, New Jersey 2001.
Wang Y., Liu Y., Gu B., “COP26: Progress, Challenges, and Outlook,” Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 39, no. 8 (2022), pp. 1209-1216, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2097-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2097-z
Weikmans R., van Asselt H., Roberts J.T., “Transparency Requirements under the Paris Agreement and Their (Un)Likely Impact on Strengthening the Ambition of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs),” Climate Policy, vol. 20, no. 4 (2019), pp. 511-526, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1695571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1695571
“What is COP26?,” The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2020, at https://www.lse.ac.uk/international-development/events/Cutting-Edge-Series-202122/Outcomes-of-COP26-and-where-next-on-Climate, 31 XII 2024.
White C.J., Sindico F., Bell K., “Climate Change: COP26 Glasgow will Provide World Stage for Scotland’s Green Innovation,” The Conversation, 8 January 2020, at https://theconversation.com/climate-change-cop26-glasgow-will-provide-world-stage-for-scotlands-greeninnovation-129158.
Yamin F., Climate Change and Carbon Markets, 1st edition, London 2012, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770781
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
