Future Tense in East Polissian (Border) Dialects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.21.2026.41.17Słowa kluczowe:
czas przyszły, czas przyszły niedokonany, wschodnia Słowiańszczyzna, język ukraiński, dialekty wschodniopoleskieAbstrakt
This article provides further insight into the use, function, and distribution of the imperfective future in East Polissian (border) dialects within the broader context of the East Slavic languages. Futurity – particularly the issue of the imperfective synthetic future in Standard Ukrainian, often discussed in relation to the analogous Romance pattern – has received substantial scholarly attention over recent decades. By contrast, relatively little attention has been devoted to the use and distribution of imperfective future constructions, both analytic (periphrastic) and synthetic, in the Central and East Polissian dialects. An examination of these constructions, alongside other dialectal morphosyntactic and typological features, is essential for achieving a more accurate areal-typological characterization of the (East) Slavic languages.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Andersen H., 2006, Periphrastic Futures in Slavic: Divergence and Convergence, [in:] K. Eksell, T. Vinther (eds.), Change in Verbal Systems: Issues in Explanation, Bern, pp. 9–45.
View in Google Scholar
Ânkoǔskì F., 1983, Gìstaryčnaâ gramatyka belaruskaj movy, Minsk.
View in Google Scholar
ASH: D.A. Marêêv, Atlas shìdnopolìs’kih govìrok, Kyiv 2019.
View in Google Scholar
AUM: Ì.G. Matvìâs et al. (eds.), Atlas ukraïns’koï movi, 3 vols., Kyiv 1984–2001.
View in Google Scholar
Bevzenko S.P., 1960, Ìstorična morfologìâ ukraïns’koï movi, Užgorod.
View in Google Scholar
Bevzenko S.P., 1980, Ukraïns’ka dìalektologìâ, Kyiv.
View in Google Scholar
Bevzenko S.P., 1997, Formi viâvu majbutn’oï dìï v ukraïns’kih dìalektah, [in:] Р.Û. Gricenko (ed.), Ukraïns’kij dìalektologìčnij zbìrnik. Kniga 3, Kyіv, pp. 213–217.
View in Google Scholar
Bevzenko S.P., Griŝenko A.P., Lukinova T.B., Nìmčuk V.V., Rusanìvs’kij V.M., Samìjlenko S.P., 1978, Ìstorìâ ukraïns’koï movi. Morfologìâ, Kyiv.
View in Google Scholar
Bybee J.L., 1985, Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form, “Typological Studies in Language”, 9, Amsterdam.
View in Google Scholar
Bybee J.L., Dahl Ö., 1989, The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World, “Studies in Language” 13 (1), pp. 51–103.
View in Google Scholar
DABM: R.Ì. Avanesaǔ, Û.F. Mackevìč et al. (eds.), Dyâlektalagìčny atlas belaruskaj movy, Minsk 1963.
View in Google Scholar
Dahl Ö., 2000, The Grammar of Future Time Reference in European Languages, [in:] idem (red.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Berlin–New York, pp. 309–327.
View in Google Scholar
Danylenko A., 2011, Is There Any Inflectional Future in East Slavic? A Case of Ukrainian against Romance Reopened, [in:] M. Nomachi (ed.), Grammaticalization in Slavic Languages: From Areal and Typological Perspectives, Sapporo, pp. 147–177.
View in Google Scholar
Del Gaudio S., 2017, An Introduction to Ukrainian Dialectology, “Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sonderband”, 94, Frankfurt am Main etc.
View in Google Scholar
Del Gaudio S., 2025a, Some Morphosyntactic and Typological Tendencies in East Polissian Border Dialects, “Aktual’ni Problemy Ukraїns’koї Lingvistiki: Teoria i Praktika”, (50), pp. 41–52.
View in Google Scholar
Del Gaudio S., 2025b, Ukrainian Border Dialects in Belarusian Russian Contact Areas: Characteristics and Trends, New York–London etc.
View in Google Scholar
Dem’ânčuk V., 1928, Či rumuns’kogo pohodžennâ formi prijdu-čogo na -mu?, „Zapiski ìstorično-fìlologìčnogo vìddìlu”, XVIII, Kyiv, pp. 313–317.
View in Google Scholar
Dindelegan G.P., Maiden M. (eds.), 2013, The Grammar of Romanian, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Křížková H., 1960, Vývoj opisného futura v jazycích slovanských, zvláště v ruštině, Praha.
View in Google Scholar
Kuznecov P.S., 1959, Očerki istoričeskoj morfologii russkogo âzyka, Moskva.
View in Google Scholar
Mackevìč Û.F., 1959, Marfalogìâ dzeâslova ǔ belaruskaj move, Minsk.
View in Google Scholar
Mackevìč Û.F., Muraško A., Oreškova A., 1964, Ob itogah raboty po sostavleniû atlasa belorusskih narodnih govorov, [in:] R.I. Avanesov (ed.), Voprosy vostočno-slavânskih âzykov, Minsk, pp. 39–59.
View in Google Scholar
Nìmčuk V.V., 1993, Ukraïns’kì govori ta bal’kans’kij movnij soûz, [in:] V.M. Rusanìvs’kij (ed.), Slovʼâns’ke movoznavstvo, Kyiv, pp. 41–63.
View in Google Scholar
Potebnâ A.L., 1874, Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike, Har’kov.
View in Google Scholar
Roncero Toledo K., 2019, A Typological Approach to West Polesian Morphology and Syntax [Doctoral thesis (PhD), The University of Surrey].
View in Google Scholar
Rusanìvs’kij V.M., 1971, Struktura ukraïns’kogo dìêslova, Kyiv.
View in Google Scholar
Šarovol’s’kij Ì., 1927, Prijdučij čas na -mu, „Zapiski ìstorično-fìlologìčnogo vìddìlu”, XIII–XIV, Kyiv, pp. 284–293.
View in Google Scholar
Smerečins’kij S., 1932, Narisi z ukraïns’koï sintaksi, Harkìv.
View in Google Scholar
Tiŝenko K.M., 2009, Ìtalìâ ì Ukraïna: tisâčolìtnì etnomovnì kontakti, Kyiv.
View in Google Scholar
Trunte H.N., 2005, Словѣньскъи ѩзыкъ: Ein praktisches Lehrbuch des Kirchenslavischen in 30 Lektionen. Zugleich eine Einführung in die slavische Philologie, München.
View in Google Scholar
Ultan R., 1978, The Nature of Future Tenses, [in:] J.H. Greenberg, C.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Stanford, pp. 83–123.
View in Google Scholar
Whaley M., 1999, Tracing the Origins of the Slavic Imperfective be-Future, “OSU Working Papers in Linguistics” 52, pp. 159–170.
View in Google Scholar
Whaley M., 2000, The Evolution of the Slavic ‘Be(come)’-Type Compound Future [PhD Thesis], The Ohio State University.
View in Google Scholar
Žilko F.T., 1966, Narisi z dìalektologìï ukraïns’koï movi, Kyiv.
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Salvatore Del Gaudio
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
