Europe Divided? Can Warsaw Become the Regional Leader of the Central and Eastern European Region?

Authors

  • Zoltan Gal Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  • Andrea Schmidt University of Pecs

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.51.12

Keywords:

geoecenomics, financial centre, transformation

Abstract

Europe Divided? Can Warsaw Become the Regional Leader of the Central and Eastern European Region?

This paper investigates the long-term problems of capital accumulation in the context of centre and periphery and dependency models, the systemic and geo-economic features of the integration of post-socialist transition countries in the context of dependent market economy (DME) model characterized by high dependency on foreign direct investment channelled by foreign MNCs into the CEE and the restructuring of the centres in Central and Eastern Europe. It argues that the global economic crisis has been exposed the systemic vulnerability of the post-socialist neo-liberal transition model characterized by foreign investment-led growth which is failed to generate domestic capital accumulation and decrease the relative development gap between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ EU members. We would like to use the principles of geoeconomics in order to analyse the Central and Eastern European region and the role of the Foregin Direct Investment and its special role in financial sector in transformation and the question of the problem of Central and Eastern European financial centres focusing on the position of Warsaw.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Zoltan Gal, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

    Is a full Professor in Regional Economics at Kaposvar University, Hungary, senior researcher at the Centre for Economic and Regional Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and President of the Hungarian Regional Science Association. His research fields include regional economics, regional finance, international finance, financial and economic geography, and regional innovation in transition countries as well as an EU and global context. He has been a visiting scholar at a number of prestigious universities including the University of Oxford, UK and Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. He holds a dual MA from the Central European University, Budapest, Hungary, and New York State University, Albany, USA, and a PhD in Financial Geography. He is a member of the editorial boards of the Journal of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, Review of Economic Perspectives, Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, and Space & Society.

  • Andrea Schmidt, University of Pecs

    Is an Asssociate Professor at University of Pecs, Department of Political Science and International Studies and former Visiting Lecturer of the Josai Institute for Central European Studies Josai International University, Tokyo, Japan, Jagiellonian University, Poland, Warsaw University, Poland, and Visiting Lecturer at Ivan Franko National University in L’viv. She holds dual MA from the Central European University, Budapest and the New York State University, Albany, the MSc degree from Budapest Business School and a PhD on Political Science from the University of Pecs. She specializes on International Political Economy and Comparative Political Studies of the Central and Eastern European region. She is author of several articles and book chapters related to Central and Eastern European and post-Soviet region.

References

Berend I., From the Soviet Bloc to the European Union. The Economic and Social Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe since 1973, Cambridge 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806995

Bevan A., Estrin S., “The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment into European Transition Economies”, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 32, no. 4 (2004), at <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2004.08.006>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2004.08.006

Bohle D., Gerskovits B., Capitalist Diversity in Europe’s Periphery, Ithaca 2012.

Csomós G., “A közép-európai régió nagyvárosainak gazdaságirányító szerepe”, Tér és Társadalom, vol. 25, no. 3 (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.25.3.1872

Estrin S. (ed.), Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe, London 1994.

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Transition Report 1998. Financial Sector in Transition, London 1998.

Eyal G., Szelenyi I., Townsley E., Making Capitalism without Capitalists. Class Formation and Elite Struggle in Post-Communist Central Europe, London–New York 1998.

Gál Z., “The Development and the Polarised Spatian Structure of the Hungarian Banking System in a Transforming Economy”, in G. Barta et al. (eds.), Hungarian Spaces and Places: Patterns of Transition, Pécs 2005.

Gál Z., “Development of International Financial Centres in Central and Eastern Europe during Transition Period and Crisis: The Case of Budapest”, Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, no. 2 (2015), pp. 53-80, at <http://dx.doi.org/10.7366/1509499526003>.

Gál Z., “Role of Financial Sector FDI in Regional Imbalances in Central and Eastern Europe”, in A. Gostyńska et al. (eds.), Eurozone Enlargement in Times of Crisis. Challenges for the V4 Countries, Warszawa 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2494171

Gál Z., Lux G., ET2050. Territorial Scenarios and Visions for Europe. Project 2013/1/19. Rinal Report, 30/06/2014, vol. 8: Territorial Scenarios and Visions for Central and Eastern Europe, Luxembourg 2014.

Gowan P., “Neo-liberal Theory and Practice for Eastern Europe”, New Left Review, no. 213 (1995).

Holland D. et al., “The Determinants and Impact of FDI in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparison of Survey and Econometric Evidence”, Transnational Corporations, vol. 9, no. 3 (2000).

Hunya G., “Mapping Flows and Patterns of Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe, Greece, Portugal during the Crisis”, in B. Galgoczi, J. Drahokoupil, M. Bernaciak (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment in Eastern and Southern Europe after 2008. Still a Lever of Growth?, Brussels 2015.

Lux G., “Can We Build Location Advantages? Local Policies for Industrial Competitiveness”, in D. Vuković, H. Hanić (eds.), Regional Development Policy. Scientific Basic and Empirical Evidence, Belgrade 2015.

Lux G., “The Institutional Conditions of Reindustrialisation in Post-crisis Central Europe”, Journal of Economics and Management, vol. 19 (2015).

Mezei C., Schmidt A., “A lengyel regionális politika és intézményei”, Tér és Társadalom, vol. 27, no. 3 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.27.3.2477

Munoz M.J., Advances in Geoeconomics, London–New York 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315312132

Myant M., Drahokoupil J., “International Integration, Varieties of Capitalism, and Resilience to Crisis in Transition Economies”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 64, no. 1 (2012), at <https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.635478>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.635478

Nölke A., Vliegenthart A., “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe”, World Politics, vol. 61, no. 4 (2009), at <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098

Oplatka A., Miklós Németh. “Mert ez az ország érdeke”, Budapest 2014.

Pavlínek P., Domański B., Guzik R., “Industrial Upgrading Through Foreign Direct Investment in Central European Automotive”, European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 16, no. 1 (2009), at <https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776408098932>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776408098932

Petsinger M., What is Geoeconomics?, at <https://www.chathamhouse.org/system/files/publications/twt/WiB%20YQA%20Geoeconomics.pdf>.

Pijl K. van der, Holman O., Raviv O., “The Resurgence of German Capital in Europe: EU Integration and the Restructuring of Atlantic Networks of Interlocking Directorates after 1991”, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 18, no. 3 (2011), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2010.488454>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2010.488454

Raviv O., “Chasing the Dragon East: Exploring the Frontiers of Western European Finance”, Contemporary Politics, vol. 14, no. 3 (2008), at <https://doi.org/10.1080/13569770802396345>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569770802396345

Rousset P., “Reflections on the Indian Process”, International Viewpoint, 5 April 20014, at <http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article75>.

Rugman A., D’Cruz J., Multinationals as Flagship Firms. Regional Business Networks, Oxford 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258185.001.0001

Sachs J., Warner A., “The Course of Natural Resources”, European Economic Review, vol. 45, no. 4-6 (2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8

Sachs J., “What Is to Be Done?”, The Economist, 13 January 1990.

Samary C., “The EU’s Eastward Expansion”, International Viewpoint, 28 June 1997, at <http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article758>.

Schmidt A., “International Political Economy, the V4 States and the Economic Transformation”, University of Pecs, 2015.

Smith A., “Europe and an Inter-dependent World: Uneven Geo-economic and Geo-political Developments”, European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 20, no. 1 (2013), at <https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412463309>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412463309

Smith A., “Imagining Geographies of the ‘New Europe’: Geo-economic Power and the New European Architecture of Integration”, Political Geography, vol. 21, no. 5 (2002), at <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00011-2>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00011-2

Søilen K.S., Geoeconomics, London 2012.

Sokol M., “Central and Eastern Europe a Decade after the Fall of State-socialism: Regional Dimensions of Transition Processes”, Regional Studies, vol. 35, no. 7 (2001), at <https://doi.org/10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120075911

/00343400120075911>.

Sparke M., “Geopolitical Fears, Geoeconomic Hopes, and the Responsibilities of Geography”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 97, no. 2 (2007), at <https://doi.org/10.111/j.1467-8306.2007.00540.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00540.x

Szilágyi I., “A földrajz a történelem kulcsa”, Magyar Tudomány, no. 11 (2011).

Taylor P., World City Network. A Global Urban Analysis, London–New York 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203634059

Wallerstein I., A modern világgazdasági rendszer kialakulása. A tőkés mezőgazdaság és az európai világgazdaság eredete a XVI. században, Budapest 1983.

Wójcik D., “Geography and Future of Stock Exchanges: Between Real and Virtual Space”, Growth and Change, vol. 38, no. 2 (2007), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2007.000364.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2007.000364.x

Downloads

Published

20-12-2017

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 6(51) (2017): The Jagiellonian Idea: Past and Present

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“Europe Divided? Can Warsaw Become the Regional Leader of the Central and Eastern European Region?”. 2017. Politeja 14 (6(51): 235-60. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.51.12.

Funding data

Similar Articles

1-10 of 197

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.