Zasady dostępu do telewizji i wykorzystywania jej jako środka politycznej komunikacji marketingowej w Zjednoczonym Królestwie Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.39.17Keywords:
Great Britain, United Kingdom, election campaign, election broadcasts, BBCAbstract
Rules for access to television as the medium of marketing political communication in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
The author describes the principles of the use of television by politicians in the United Kingdom. First of all, the rules under the Communications Act 2003, the Royal Charter and Agreement for the BBC and documents issued by the Office of Communications are discussed. The role of ministers’ announcement as a tool available for the members of the government is emphasized. In the key part of the article the author analyzes and comments on the rules of allocation and emission of political party broadcasts (PPBs) and party election broadcasts (PEBs). These programmes are transmitted by both the BBC and commercial televisions. Afterwards, the author discusses the differences between major and minor parties, and then the existing ban on paid political advertising. Finally, the author points to the nature of the British political broadcasts system and its possible grounds.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Adamowski J., Czwarty stan. Media masowe w pejzażu społecznym Wielkiej Brytanii, Warszawa 2006.
Google Scholar
Are Young People Watching Less TV? (Updated – Q4 2013 Data), „Marketing Charts” 2014, 10 III, [online] http://www.marketingcharts.com/wp/television/are‑young‑people‑watching‑less‑tv‑24817.
Google Scholar
Batorski D., Polacy wobec technologii cyfrowych – uwarunkowania dostępności i sposobów korzystania. Diagnoza Społeczna 2013 Warunki i Jakość Życia Polaków – Raport, „Contemporary Economics” 2013, Vol. 7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.o295
Google Scholar
BBC Trust, BBC’s Criteria for the Allocation of PPBs, [online] http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/consult/ppb/ppb_criteria.pdf.
Google Scholar
BBC Trust, The BBC’s final criteria for Party Election Broadcasts in 2014, [online] http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/peb/2014/peb_criteria.pdf.
Google Scholar
BBC Trust, Consultation on Party Political Broadcasts. Outcome of consultation, [online] http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/ppb/ppb_consultation_statement.pdf.
Google Scholar
Bladocha B.H., Wolność słowa w systemie medialnym Wielkiej Brytanii, Toruń 2003.
Google Scholar
Broadcasters’ Liaison Group, About us, [online] http://www.broadcastersliaisongroup.org.uk/about.html.
Google Scholar
Broadcasters’ Liaison Group, Qualification Criteria. General Election 2010, [online] http://www.broadcastersliaisongroup.org.uk/criteria_genelect.html.
Google Scholar
Broadcasting. An Agreement Between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the British Broadcasting Corporation, Cm 6872, [online] http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/how_we_govern/agreement.pdf.
Google Scholar
Broadcasting. Copy of Royal Charter for the continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation, Cm 6925, [online] http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/how_we_govern/charter.pdf.
Google Scholar
Carr N., Płytki umysł. Jak internet wpływa na nasz mózg, Gliwice 2013.
Google Scholar
Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Party Political Broadcasting. Public Consultation, [online] http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.culture.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/220FA8BF‑DFB4‑4FEB‑81AC‑04DBD683A365/0/Partypoliticalconsultation.pdf.
Google Scholar
Eggen D., Obama Campaign Has Spent More on Ads Than Romney’s, „The Washington Post” 2012, 2 XI, [online] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post‑politics/wp/2012/11/02/romney‑campaign‑ads‑outnumber‑obama‑ads‑in‑final‑stretch.
Google Scholar
The Electoral Commission, Party Political Broadcasts – Recommendations for the Future, [online] http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i‑am‑a/journalist/electoral‑commission‑media‑centre/news‑releases‑reviews‑and‑research/party‑political‑broadcasts–recommendations‑for‑the‑future.
Google Scholar
ETPC, Case of Animal Defenders International v. The United Kingdom (Application no. 48876/08), [online] http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx#{“appno-”:[“48876/08”],”itemid”:[“001‑119244”]}.
Google Scholar
Gay O., Party Political Broadcasts, 10 I 2010, [online] http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc‑03354.pdf.
Google Scholar
Gay O., Party Political Broadcasts, 2 V 2013, [online] http://www.parliament.uk/briefing‑papers/SN03354.pdf.
Google Scholar
Grim R., Will The Online Campaign Kill The TV Ad?, „The Huffington Post” 2012, 7 VI, [online] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/07/online‑campaign‑political‑advertising‑tv‑ad_n_1576434.html.
Google Scholar
Holtz‑Bacha C., Kaid L.L., Political Advertising in International Comparison, [w:] The SAGE Handbook of Political Advertising, red. L.L. Kaid, C. Holtz‑Bacha, Thousand Oaks, Calif. 2006.
Google Scholar
Hudson J., The Most Expensive Election in History by the Numbers, „The Wire” 2012, 6 XI, [online] http://www.thewire.com/politics/2012/11/most‑expensive‑election‑history‑numbers/58745.
Google Scholar
Kolczyński M., Sztumski J., Marketing polityczny, Katowice 2003.
Google Scholar
Komunikat Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej z dnia 13 lutego 2012 r. w sprawie sprawozdań finansowych komitetów wyborczych uczestniczących w wyborach do Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej i do Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, przeprowadzonych w dniu 9 października 2011 r., M.P. 2012, nr 0, poz. 126.
Google Scholar
Konwencja o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności, Dz. U. 1993, nr 61, poz. 284.
Google Scholar
KRRiT Departament Monitoringu, Rynek telewizyjny w 2011 roku – analiza. Udziały, czas oglądania, struktura widowni programów telewizyjnych, Warszawa 2012, [online] http://www.krrit.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/Portals/0/kontrola/program/tv/problemowe/rynek‑telewizyjny‑2011‑analiza.pdf.
Google Scholar
KRRiT Departament Monitoringu, Rynek telewizyjny w 2012, Warszawa 2012, [online] http://www.krrit.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/Portals/0/kontrola/program/tv/kwartalne/rynek‑telewizyjny–w‑2012‑roku–analiza.pdf.
Google Scholar
KRRiT Departament Monitoringu, Rynek telewizyjny w II kwartale 2012 r., Warszawa 2012, [online] http://www.krrit.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/Portals/0/kontrola/program/tv/kwartalne/rynek_tv_ii_kw_2012.pdf.
Google Scholar
KRRiT Departament Monitoringu, Rynek telewizyjny w II kwartale 2013 r., Warszawa 2013, [online] http://www.krrit.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/pliki/publikacje/rynek‑telewizyjny‑w‑ii‑kwartale‑2013.pdf.
Google Scholar
Mad Money. TV Ads in the 2012 Presidential Campaign, „The Washington Post” 2012, 14 XI, [online] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp‑srv/special/politics/track‑presidential‑campaign‑ads‑2012.
Google Scholar
Newman N., #UKelection2010, Mainstream Media and the Role of the Internet. How Social and Digital Media Affected the Business of Politics and Journalism, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, VII 2010, [online] https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/Publications/Working_Papers/Social_Media_and_the_Election.pdf.
Google Scholar
OFCOM, The Communication Market Report. United Kingdom. The Reinvention of the 1950s Living Room, [online] http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market‑data‑research/market‑data/communications‑market‑reports/cmr13/uk.
Google Scholar
OFCOM, The Communications Market Report 2013, [online] http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/cmr13/2013_UK_CMR.pdf.
Google Scholar
OFCOM, OFCOM List of Major Parties, [online] http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/broadcast/guidance/major‑parties.pdf.
Google Scholar
OFCOM, A Review of the OFCOM Rules on Party Political and Referendum Broadcasts and Proposed Ofcom Guidance for Broadcast Coverage of Elections. Statement, [online] http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/ppbs/statement/statement.pdf.
Google Scholar
Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c. 41).
Google Scholar
S4C, S4C Policy on Party Political Broadcasts (PPB), Party Election Broadcasts (PEB) and Referendum Broadcasts, [online] http://www.s4c.co.uk/abouts4c/authority/pdf/PPB‑PEB‑RefBcsts_eng.pdf.
Google Scholar
Scammell M., Langer A.I., Political Advertising in the United Kingdom, [w:] The SAGE Handbook of Political Advertising, red. L.L. Kaid, C. Holtz‑Bacha, Thousand Oaks, Calif. 2006.
Google Scholar
Ustawa z dnia 29 grudnia 1992 r. o radiofonii i telewizji, Dz. U. 1993, nr 7, poz. 34 z późn. zm.
Google Scholar
Ustawa z dnia 5 stycznia 2011 r. Kodeks wyborczy, Dz. U. 2011, nr 21, poz. 112 z późn. zm.
Google Scholar
Ustawa z dnia 3 lutego 2011 r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks wyborczy, Dz. U. 2011, nr 26, poz. 134.
Google Scholar
Wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 20 lipca 2011 r., sygn. akt K 9/11, Dz. U. 2011, nr 149, poz. 889.
Google Scholar
Żurawski J., Internet jako współczesny środek elektronicznej komunikacji wyborczej i jego zastosowanie w polskich kampaniach parlamentarnych, Kraków 2010, Societas – Księgarnia Akademicka, 19.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
