The Connection between Brexit and Attempts to Find an Answer to the West Lothian Question

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.97.05

Keywords:

devolution, England, United Kingdom, West Lothian Question, English Question, Brexit, nationalism

Abstract

The article constitutes an attempt to deal with the paradox contained in the West Lothian Question (known also as the English Question) which remains one of the greatest anomalies of the British constitutional system. Since the 1970s (when this question was asked for the first time) there have been many legal and political disputes over that issue, and even the idea of ‘English votes for English laws’ (EVEL) was implemented by the British parliament.
The purpose of the article is to analyze and evaluate the potential impact of Brexit on that issue. By applying the historical method as well as the institutional and legal analysis method, the author verifies the hypothesis that Brexit will not be a breakthrough in finding an optimal solution to this legal and constitutional conundrum, even though in the post-Brexit reality this issue will keep returning, gaining a completely new meaning in the eyes of the British.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Łukasz Danel, Krakow University of Economics, Poland

    Habilitated doctor, associate professor in the Department of Political Studies at the Krakow University of Economics, Rector’s Representative for Equal Treatment, supervisor of the ‘Homo Politicus’ students scientific association, author of numerous publications devoted to the British political and constitutional system, including a monograph on Brexit.

References

Adler J., Constitutional and Administrative Law, Basingstoke–New York 2013.

Birrell D., Carmichael P., Heenan D., Devolution in the UK: Politics, Power and Policies, London 2023.

Black J., English Nationalism: A Short History, London 2018.

Bogdanor V., Devolution in the United Kingdom, Oxford–New York 2001.

Cabinet Office, English Votes for English Laws: An Explanatory Guide to Proposals, July 2015, at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a8169d8e5274a2e8ab53db4/English_votes_for_English_laws_explanatory_guide.pdf.

Calhoun C., “Populism: Nationalism and Brexit,” in W. Outhwaite (ed.), Brexit: Sociological Responses, London–New York 2017, pp. 57-76.

“Commons Scraps English Votes for English Laws,” BBC, 14 July 2021, at https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-57828406.

Dalyell T., Devolution: The End of Britain?, London 1977.

Danel Ł., “Brytyjskie dylematy konstytucyjne ‘pytania z West Lothian,’” Studia Polityczne, vol. 45, no. 4 (2017), pp. 109-127.

Danel Ł., “Euroscepticism or Nationalism — Which Better Explains the Decision of the British to Leave the European Union?,” Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem, vol. 43, no. 1 (2021), pp. 125-138, https://doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.43.1.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.43.1.8

Danel Ł., Zrozumieć Brexit. Przyczyny wystąpienia Zjednoczonego Królestwa Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej z Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2022.

Dunin-Wasowicz R., “Long Read: Is Brexit the English Reaction to Devolution?,” LSE, 10 October 2019, at https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2019/10/10/devolution-brexit-and-englishnationalism/.

Gay O., The McKay Commission: Report of the Commission on the Consequences of Devolution for the House of Commons: Standard Note: SN/PC/06821, London 2014.

Gay O., Holden H., Bowers P., The West Lothian Question: Standard Note: SN/PC/2586, London 2012.

Gover D., Kenny M., “Answering the West Lothian Question? A Critical Assessment of ‘English Votes for English Laws’ in the UK Parliament,” Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. 4 (2018), pp. 760-782, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy003

Gover D., Kenny M., Finding the Good in EVEL: An Evaluation of ‘English Votes on English Laws’ in the House of Commons, Edinburgh 2016.

Hazell R. (ed.), Constitutional Futures Revisited: Britain’s Constitution to 2020, Basingstoke–New York 2008, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595088

Hazell R., The English Question, London 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjj012

Henderson A. et al., “How Brexit Was Made in England?,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 19, no. 4 (2017), pp. 631-646, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117730542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117730542

Kumar K., The Making of English National Identity, Cambridge 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550058

Leyland P., The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis, Oxford–Portland 2012.

Mitchell J., Devolution in the UK, Manchester–New York 2009, https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719053580.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719053580.001.0001

Russell M., Lodge G., Westminster and the English Question, London 2005.

Taylor R.B., “The West Lothian Question, EVEL and the 2017 General Election,” UK Constitutional Law Association, 13 June 2017, at https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2017/06/13/robert-brett-taylor-the-west-lothian-question-evel-and-the-2017-general-election/.

Downloads

Published

03-09-2025

How to Cite

“The Connection Between Brexit and Attempts to Find an Answer to the West Lothian Question”. 2025. Politeja 22 (3(97): 109-21. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.97.05.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 429

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.