Is That West of Us Still the West?
A Note on the Humanist Approach to the Question of Continuity vs. Discontinuity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.57.02Keywords:
West, humanism, discontinuity, civilizationAbstract
The article takes up the concept of “Central Eastern Europe” only to show that it makes sense if we can reshape our political imagination. What is crucial is our perception of the West which now is based on intellectual assumptions about the continuity of Western civilization. Rather, we should reflect on the role of discontinuity as the key to contemporary politics or, more broadly, to modernity. To explain this possibility, the Humanists’ (Irving Babbitt’s and Paul Elmer More’s, preceded by Thomas Hulme’s) approach is briefly surveyed, with special reference to the question of civilization vs. barbarism as the most relevant, or most urgent, distinction in the modern world. The main message is that we, the “Central Eastern Europeans,” are very much in need of political realism. This ought to be, however, a type of realism based on profound philosophical insight, like that of the Humanists.
Downloads
References
Babbitt I., Democracy and Leadership, Indianapolis 1979.
Babbitt I., “Humanism: An Essay at Definition”, in N. Foerster (ed.), Humanism and America: Essays on the Outlook of Modern Civilization, New York 1930.
Babbitt I., “Humanistic Education in China and the West”, The Chinese Students’ Monthly, vol. 17, no. 2 (December 1921).
Babbitt I., “Interpreting India to the West”, in I. Babbitt, F. Manchester, F. Giese, W.F. Giese (eds.), Spanish Character and Other Essays, Boston–New York 1940.
Babbitt I., Literature and the American College: Essays in Defense of the Humanities, Boston–New York 1908.
Babbitt I., Rousseau and Romanticism, Boston–New York 1919.
Babbitt I., “What I Believe: Rousseau and Religion”, in I. Babbitt, F. Manchester, F. Giese, W.F. Giese (eds.), Spanish Character and Other Essays, Boston–New York 1940.
Hulme T.E., Read H., Speculations: Essays on Humanism and the Philosophy of Art, London–New York 1936.
Lippmann W., Public Opinion, New York 1997.
More P.E., “Academic Leadership”, in P.E. More, Shelburne Essays Ninth Series: Aristocracy and Justice, Boston–New York 1915.
More P.E., “Definitions of Dualism”, in P.E. More, Shelburne Essays Eighth Series: The Drift of Romanticism, New York–Boston.
More P.E., Harris C.M., The Jessica Letters, An Editor’s Romance, New York–London 1904.
More P.E., “Rousseau”, in P.E. More, Shelburne Essays Sixth Series: Studies of Religious Dualism, New York–London 1909.
More P.E., The Christ of the New Testament, Princeton 1924.
More P.E., The Demon of The Absolute (New Shelburne Essays I), Princeton 1928.
More P.E., The Religion of Plato, Princeton–London 1921.
More P.E., “The Religious Ground of Humanitarianism”, in P.E. More, Shelburne Essays First Series, New York–London 1904.
More P.E., “Tolstoy; Or, the Ancient Feud Between Philosophy and Art”, in P.E. More, Shelburne Essays First Series, New York–London 1904.
Murry J.M., The Evolution of an Intellectual, New York 1920.
Strauss L., “Social Science and Humanism”, in L. Strauss, Th.L. Pangle, The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism: An Introduction to the Thought of Leo Strauss, Chicago–London 1989.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Paweł Armada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
