Populizm – niejednoznaczny fenomen

Zestawienie perspektyw teoretycznych

  • Joanna Cichecka Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków
Keywords: populism, neopopulism, neopluralism, delegative democracy, Latin America

Abstract

Populism – an Undefinable Phenomenon: Record of Theoretical Perspectives
The article is a summary of the most popular concepts of populism – presented both from the historical and contemporary perspective. The author pays attention to controversies of the mere concept of populism, which are still present in modern social sciences. A starting point of the analysis are XIX century agrarian populism and types of populism. The example of both the variety of the mere phenomenon and diversity of theoretical perspectives engaged by the scientists to clarify the concept are social changes in Latin America in the 80s and 90s.

Author Biography

Joanna Cichecka, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

absolwentka polonistyki i socjologii oraz doktorantka w Katedrze Filozofii Polityki w Instytucie Nauk Politycznych i Stosunków Międzynarodowych UJ.

References

Canovan M., Populism, London 1981.

Di Tella T., Populism and Reform in Latin America, [w:] Obstacles to Change in Latin America, red. C. Véliz, London 1965.

Dix R.H., Populism: Authoritarian and Democratic, „Latin American Research Review” 1985, vol. 20, nr 2.

Ellner S., The Contrasting Variants of the Populism of Hugo Chávez and Alberto Fujimori, „Journal of Latin American Studies” 2003, vol. 35, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006685

Ellner S., The Heyday of Radical Populism in Venezuela and Its Aftermath, [w:] Populism in Latin America, red. M.L. Conniff, Tuscaloosa 1999.

Ellner S., Hugo Chávez y Alberto Fujimori: Análisis comparativo de dos variantes de populismo, „Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales” 2004, vol. 10, nr 1.

Frei R., Kaltwasser C.R., El populismo como experimento político: historia y teoría política de una ambivalencia, „Revista de Sociología” 2008, nr 22, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719‑529X.2008.14485.

Huntington S.P., The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman 1991, Julian J. Rothbaum Distinguished Lecture Series.

Jansen R.S., Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism, „Sociological Theory” 2011, vol. 29, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9558.2011.01388.x.

Kenney Ch.D., Fujimori’s Coup and the Breakdown of Democracy in Latin America, Notre Dame 2004.

Kitching G., Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective. Populism, Nationalism and Industrialization, London–New York 1989, Development and Underdevelopment. Open University Set Book.

Kitschelt H., Popular Dissatisfaction with Democracy. Populism and Party Systems, [w:] Democracies and the Populist Challenge, red. Y. Mény, Y. Surel, New York 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_10

Laclau E., Rozum populistyczny, red. T. Szkudlarek, przeł. A. Alchimowicz i in., Wrocław 2009, Biblioteka Współczesnej Myśli Społecznej, 16.

Marczewska‑Rytko M., Demokracja bezpośrednia w teorii i praktyce politycznej, Lublin 2001.

Marczewska‑Rytko M., Populizm. Teoria i praktyka polityczna, Lublin 1995.

O’Donnell G.A., Delegative Democracy, „Journal of Democracy” 1994, vol. 5, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010

Oxhorn P.D., Is the Century of Corporatism Over? Neoliberalism and the Rise of Neopluralism, [w:] What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism, red. P.D. Oxhorn, G. Ducatenzeiler, University Park (Pa.) 1998.

Populism in Latin America, red. M.L. Conniff, Tuscaloosa 1999.

Populizm, [w:] Encyklopedia socjologii, t. 3, Warszawa 2000.

Quintero R., El mito del populismo en el Ecuador. Análisis de los fundamentos del estado ecuatoriano moderno (1895‑1934), Quito 1980.

Roberts K.M., Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America. The Peruvian Case, „World Politics” 1995, vol. 48, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1995.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1995.0004

Roxborough I., Unity and Diversity in Latin American History, „Journal of Latin American Studies” 1984, vol. 16, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00004016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00004016

Szacki J., Pytania o populizm, „Krytyka Polityczna” 2003, nr 4.

Torre C. de la, The Ambiguous Meanings of Latin American Populisms, „Social Research” 1992, vol. 59, nr 2.

Torre C. de la, Populist Seduction in Latin America. The Ecuadorian Experience, Athens (OH) 2000, Research in International Studies. Latin America Series, 32.

Vilas C.M., El populismo latinoamericano: un enfoque estructural, „Desarrollo Económico” 1988, vol. 28, nr 111, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3466951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3466951

Walicki A., Russia, [w:] Populism. Its Meanings and National Characteristics, red. G. Ionescu, E. Gellner, London 1969.

Weyland K., Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics, „Comparative Politics” 2001, vol. 34, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/422412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422412

Weyland K., Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe, „Comparative Politics” 1999, vol. 31, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/422236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422236

Weyland K., Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: How Much Affinity, „Third World Quarterly” 2003, vol. 24, nr 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590310001630080

Weyland K., Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities, „Studies in Comparative International Development” 1996, vol. 31, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02738987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738987

Weyland K., Swallowing the Bitter Pill: Sources of Popular Support for Neoliberal Reform in Latin America, „Comparative Political Studies” 1998, vol. 31, nr 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031005001

Published
2019-05-22
How to Cite
Cichecka, Joanna. 2019. “Populizm – Niejednoznaczny Fenomen: Zestawienie Perspektyw Teoretycznych”. Politeja 15 (4(55), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.55.01.
Section
Myśl polityczna