Rywalizacja chińsko-amerykańska w drugiej dekadzie XXI wieku: Analiza porównawcza polityki Baracka Obamy i Donalda Trumpa

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.74.19

Keywords:

China, United States, power transition, Donald Trump, Barack Obama, Joe Biden

Abstract

Sino-American Rivalry in the Second Decade of the 21st Century: A Comparative Analysis of Barack Obama and Donald Trump Policies

The Sino-American trade war has become a symbol of rivalry for leadership in the international system. It also attracts growing attention to the problem of possible change to the regional and global hegemony. The debate with its possible ramifications is clear to academics, the media and political elites. However, it has focused on a limited scope of factors and mostly at the leadership level of, most notably, the United States of America. Considering its complexity, the issue of US policy towards China should be analyzed at various levels. These include the presidents, their collaborators, domestic politics and US strategy, and, finally, the international system as it experiences the relative change of power distribution. The main goal of this article is to analyze the recent US administrations’ strategy towards the People’s Republic of China. This is in the context of changes to the international system, focusing on the relative change of power distribution. The hypothesis driving this article states that the US strategy towards China is a response to the changing relative distribution of power in the regional and global system. It follows that American administrations differ rather in methods than in goals of foreign policy. This text is prepared with reference to the Power Transition Theory of A. Organski and J. Kugler, and the research is based on the US strategic documents’ analysis and statistical analysis of the power distribution in the system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Marcin Grabowski, Jagiellonian University, Kraków

Adiunkt w Katedrze Historii Dyplomacji i Polityki Międzynarodowej Instytutu Nauk Politycznych i Stosunków Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, kierownik Centrum Studiów Międzynarodowych i Rozwoju UJ (Centre for International Studies and Development) oraz członek Executive Committee Central and Eastern International Studies Association (CEEISA). Jego badania koncentrują się na problematyce integracji gospodarczej Azji i Pacyfiku, polityce zagranicznej Stanów Zjednoczonych oraz Chin, międzynarodowych stosunkach gospodarczych i teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Studiował w prestiżowych uczelniach amerykańskich, Uniwersytecie Columbia w Nowym Jorku, George Washington University w Waszyngtonie, czy Uniwersytecie Kalifornijskim w San Diego, gdzie ukończył Global Leadership Institute. Prowadził też badania w kluczowych ośrodkach zajmujących się problematyką azjatycką: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies w Singapurze, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy w Seulu, Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies Uniwersytetu Waseda w Tokio, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research w Canberze, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies w Kopenhadze, Reischauer Center for East Asia Studies, School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University w Waszyngtonie czy Berkeley APEC Study Center (University of California w Berkeley).

References

A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision, Department of State, Washington 2019, s. 4, [online] Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf (state.gov).
Google Scholar

Allison G., Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?, Boston–New York 2017.
Google Scholar

Barbasiewicz O., Grabowski M., Trojnar E., Changing Security Dynamics in the Indo-Pacific, [w:] Security Dilemmas and Challenges in 21st Century Asia, red. O. Barbasiewicz, M. Grabowski, E. Trojnar, Berlin 2020, https://doi.org/10.3726/b17044.
Google Scholar

Blackwill R., Trump’s Foreign Policies Are Better Than They Seem, „Council Special Report” 2019, no. 84, Council on Foreign Relations, New York 2019.
Google Scholar

Campbell K., Andrews B., Explaining the U.S. ‘Pivot to Asia, August 2013, Chatham House, [online] www.chathamhouse.org.
Google Scholar

Campbell K., Patel N., Singh V., The Power of Balance: America in Asia, Washington 2008.
Google Scholar

Campbell K., Sullivan J., Competition Without Catastrophe: How America Can Both Challenge and Coexist with China, „Foreign Affairs” 2019, vol. 98, no. 5, s. 96-111.
Google Scholar

Clinton H., America’s Pacific Century, „Foreign Policy” 2011, 11 X, [online] https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/.
Google Scholar

Colby E., Michell W., The Age of Great Power Competition: How the Trump Administration Refashioned American Strategy, „Foreign Affairs” 2020, vol. 99, no. 1, s. 118-130.
Google Scholar

Duggan N., Grabowski M., The Influence of Covid-19 on the Power Transition between the United States and China: The Case of Southeast Asia, „Irish Studies in International Affairs” 2021, vol. 32, no. 1, s. 1-20.
Google Scholar

Elms D., The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership: Policy Innovations and Impacts, GED Working Paper, Singapore 2018, [online] http://aei.pitt.edu/102526/1/MT_Comprehensive_and_Progressive_Trans-Pacific_Partnership.pdf.
Google Scholar

Fels E., Shifting Power in the Asia-Pacific? The Rise of China, Sino-US Competition and Regional Middle Power Allegiance, Cham 2017.
Google Scholar

Foot R., Power Transitions and Great Power Management: Three Decades of China–Japan–US Relations, „Pacific Review” 2017, vol. 30, no. 6, s. 829-842, https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1303535.
Google Scholar

Gill B., The United States and Asia in 2015: Across the Region, US-China Competition Intensifies, „Asian Survey” 2016, vol. 56, no. 1, s. 8-18, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2016.56.1.8.
Google Scholar

Gili A., Gili M., Why China Has Not Caught Up Yet: Military-Technological Superiority and the Limits of Imitation, Reverse Engineering, and Cyber Espionage, „International Security” 2018, vol. 43, no. 3, s. 141-189, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00337.
Google Scholar

Gill B., The United States and Asia in 2016: Challenges in the Region and on the Home Front, „Asian Survey” 2017, vol. 57, no. 1, s. 10-20, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2017.57.1.10.
Google Scholar

Glaser B., Pivot to Asia: Prepare for Unintended Consequences, [online] http://csis.org/files/publication/120413_gf_glaser.pdf.
Google Scholar

Glaser B., Price H., Continuity Prevails in Biden’s First 100 Days, „Comparative Connections” 2021, vol. 23, no. 1, s. 29-42.
Google Scholar

Godement F., The United States and Asia in 2010: Uncertain Relations, „Asian Survey” 2011, vol. 51, no. 1, s. 5-17, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2011.51.1.5.
Google Scholar

Grabowski M., Wiek Pacyfiku – polityka Stanów Zjednoczonych wobec regionu Azji i Pacyfiku po roku 1989, Kraków 2012.
Google Scholar

Grabowski M., Duggan N., Donald Trump Presidency and the Transformation of Sino-American Relations: Does Asymmetric Economic Interdependence Matter?, „Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia” 2021, vol. 20, no. 2.
Google Scholar

Grabowski M., Pugacewicz T., Is Trans-Pacific Partnership a Challenge for Transatlantic Relations? A Comparative Analysis of TPP and TTIP in the Context of the US Global Role, [w:] Poland in Transatlantic Relations after 1989: Miracle Fair, red. M. Zachara, Newcastle upon Tyne 2017, s. 86-124.
Google Scholar

Holslag J., The United States and Asia in 2019: Grandstanding, „Asian Survey” 2020, vol. 60, no. 1, s. 8-20, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2020.60.1.8.
Google Scholar

IMF Members’ Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors, [online] https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx.
Google Scholar

Interim National Security Strategic Guidance, The White House, Washington 2021.
Google Scholar

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Subscriptions and Voting Power of Member Countries, [online] http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/795101541106471736/IBRDCountryVotingTable. pdf.
Google Scholar

Johnston A.I., China in a World of Orders: Rethinking Compliance and Challenge in Beijing’s International Relations, „International Security” 2019, vol. 44, no. 2, s. 9-60, https://doi. org/10.1162/isec_a_00360.
Google Scholar

Joshi Y., Atmakuri A., Biden’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: Expectations and Challenges, Singapore 2021.
Google Scholar

Kan S., U.S. China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress, CRS Report for Congress, Washington 2013, s. 4.
Google Scholar

Katagiri N., Strategy and Grand Strategy for the Future of Asia, „Asian Survey” 2015, vol. 55, no. 6, s. 1170-1192, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2015.55.6.1170.
Google Scholar

Kim W., Gates S., Power Transition Theory and the Rise of China, „International Area Studies Review” 2015, vol. 18, no. 3, s. 219-226, https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865915598545.
Google Scholar

Kissinger H., The Future of U.S.-Chinese Relations: Conflict is a Choice, Not a Necessity, „Foreign Affairs” 2012, vol. 91, no. 2, s. 44-55.
Google Scholar

Kugler J., Organski A.F.K, The Power Transition: A Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation, [w:] Handbook of War Studies, red. M. Midlarsky, New York 2011, s. 171-194.
Google Scholar

Logan J., China, America, and the Pivot to Asia, „Policy Analysis” 2013, nr 717, Cato Institute.
Google Scholar

Mastro O., The Stealth Superpower: How China Hid Its Global Ambitions, „Foreign Affairs” 2019, vol. 98, no. 1, s. 31-39.
Google Scholar

Mearsheimer J., Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order, „International Security” 2019, vol. 43, no. 4, s. 7-50, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342.
Google Scholar

National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2015, The White House, Washington 2015, [online] https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf.
Google Scholar

National Security Strategy of the United States of America, The White House, Washington 2017, [online] https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf.
Google Scholar

Organski A.F.K., World Politics, New York 1958 (1968).
Google Scholar

Organski A.F.K., Kugler J., The War Ledger, Chicago 1980, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226351841.001.0001.
Google Scholar

Paal D., The United States in Asia in 2011: Obama Determined to Bring America „Back” to Asia, „Asian Survey” 2012, vol. 52, no. 1, s. 6-14, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2012.52.1.6.
Google Scholar

Paal D., The United States and Asia in 2012: Domestic Politics Takes Charge, „Asian Survey” 2013, vol. 53, no. 1, s. 12-21, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2013.53.1.12.
Google Scholar

Ratner E., Rebalancing to Asia with an Insecure China, „The Washington Quarterly” 2013, vol. 32, no. 2, s. 21-38, https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2013.791080.
Google Scholar

Roehrig T., The United States and Asia in 2020: Free, Open and Worried?, „Asian Survey” 2021, vol. 61, no. 1, s. 11-20.
Google Scholar

Schier S., Eberly T., The Trump Presidency: Outsider in the Oval Office, Lanham 2017.
Google Scholar

Shambaugh D., U.S.-China Rivalry in Southeast Asia: Power Shift or Competitive Coexistence?, „International Security” 2018, vol. 42, no. 4, s. 85-127, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00314.
Google Scholar

Shareholders, Asian Development Bank, [online] https://www.adb.org/site/investors/creditfundamentals/shareholders.
Google Scholar

Silove N., The Pivot before the Pivot: U.S. Strategy to Preserve the Power Balance in Asia, „International Security” 2018, vol. 40, no. 4, s. 45-88, https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00238.
Google Scholar

Simon S., The US Rebalance and Southeast Asia: A Work in Progress, „Asian Survey” 2015, vol. 5, no. 3, s. 572-595, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2015.55.3.572.
Google Scholar

Summary of the National Defense Strategy: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge, Department of Defense 2018, [online] https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf.
Google Scholar

Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense, The White House, I 2012, [online] https://archive.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf.
Google Scholar

Sutter R., The U.S. and Asia in 2018: North Korea Easing, Confronting China, „Asian Survey” 2019, vol. 59, no. 1, s. 10-20, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2019.59.1.10.
Google Scholar

Sutter R., The United States and Asia in 2017: The Impact of the Trump Administration, „Asian Survey” 2018, vol. 58, no. 1, s. 10-20, https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.1.10.
Google Scholar

The Department of Defense, Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region, Department of Defense, Washington 2019, [online] https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF.
Google Scholar

The National Security Strategy of the United States 2010, The White House, Washington 2010, [online] https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf.
Google Scholar

Westad O., The Sources of Chinese Conduct: Are Washington and Beijing Fighting a New Cold War?, „Foreign Affairs” 2019, vol. 98, no. 5, s. 86-95.
Google Scholar

Yahuda M., The International Politics of the Asia-Pacific, London–New York 2019, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315543291.
Google Scholar

Yan Xuetong, The Age of Uneasy Peace: Chinese Power in a Divided World, „Foreign Affairs” 2019, vol. 98, no. 5, s. 40-46.
Google Scholar

Zakaria F., The New China Scare: Why America Shouldn’t Panic About Its Latest Challenger, „Foreign Affairs” 2020, vol. 99, no. 1, s. 52-69.
Google Scholar

Zhu Z., Power Transition and US-China Relations: Is War Inevitable?, „Journal of International and Area Studies” 2005, vol. 12, no. 1, s. 1-24.
Google Scholar

Published

2021-12-15 — Updated on 2022-02-25

How to Cite

Grabowski, Marcin. 2022. “Rywalizacja chińsko-amerykańska W Drugiej Dekadzie XXI Wieku: Analiza porównawcza Polityki Baracka Obamy I Donalda Trumpa”. Politeja 18 (5(74):315-34. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.74.19.

Funding data