Poland’s Political Apparitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.67.01Keywords:
political aesthetics, nationalism, social democracy, neoliberalism, egalitarian liberalismAbstract
Poland’s Political Apparitions: How to Dispel Them
In this paper I will argue that within the decades since the Velvet Revolution of 1989, the mutual perception of the liberal and leftist political formations negatively affected the prospects of their possible cooperation. A failure of the Polish liberals to cooperate with Poland’s Left was among the main reasons for the inability to form a progressive alliance. More importantly, it left a fertile ground upon which populist and authoritarian movements were able to grow. As a result, Poland, initially presented as a role model of the transition from the conditions of the “real” socialism, has become an oppressive despotic regime, just like Turkey and Hungary. I will attempt to explain the emergence of the non-liberal democracy in Poland by stressing in particular the failure of the Polish liberals to take seriously the problems of social and economic exclusion resulting from the economic shock therapy applied during the transformative decades. Pointing to the tradition of the egalitarian liberalism, largely o erlooked in Poland, I will argue that there are both doctrinal resources and practical models which could be tapped by Polish liberals in order to establish a fruitful cooperation with the Poland’s Left. Such a programme would have a chance to succeed on the condition of dispelling the phantom of neoliberalism
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Atkinson A., Inequality. What Can be Done?, Cambridge MA–London 2015, https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674287013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674287013
Google Scholar
Beveridge W., Why I Am a Liberal, London 1945.
Google Scholar
Blair T., Against Populism, the Center Must Hold, „New York Times” 2017, 3 III.
Google Scholar
Chavagneux Ch., Europe Resists the Global Inequality Trend, 19 XII 2017, [online] https://voxeurop.eu/en/2017/inequalities-world-5121694.
Google Scholar
Chmielewski A., Politics and Recognition. Towards a New Political Aesthetics, London 2020,
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297489.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297489
Google Scholar
Chmielewski A., Psychopatologie życia politycznego. Podręcznik ilustrowany, Wrocław 2009.
Google Scholar
Drałus D., The Reciprocal Cosmopolitanism, „Problemos” 2020, nr 97, https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.97.1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.97.1
Google Scholar
Dunin K., Niewidzialna noga rynku, „Gazeta Wyborcza” 2007, 23 III.
Google Scholar
Dunin K., Poza rynkiem i konserwą, „Gazeta Wyborcza” 2007, 24 II.
Google Scholar
Eccleshall R. i in., Political Ideologies. An Introduction, London–New York, 1994.
Google Scholar
Eidlin F., Popper’s Social-Democratic Politics and Free-Market Liberalism, „Critical Review”, vol. 17, nr 1-2, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810508443626.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810508443626
Google Scholar
Gadomski W., Rynek jest ciepły, „Gazeta Wyborcza” 2007, 3 III.
Google Scholar
Green T.H., Lectures on the Political Obligation, Longmans, Green and Co., London–New York–Toronto 1941.
Google Scholar
Hobson J.A., A Reader, red. M. Freeden, London 1988.
Google Scholar
Houllebecq M., Extension du domaine de la lutte, Paris 1994; wyd. pol.: Poszerzenie pola walki, przeł. E. Wieleżyńska, Poznań 2005.
Google Scholar
Krastev I., The New Europe: Respectable Populism, Clockwork Liberalism, „Open Democracy” 2006, 21 III , [online] https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/new_europe_3376jsp/.
Google Scholar
MacIntyre A., Marxism and Christianity, London 1995.
Google Scholar
Mann T., Czarodziejska góra, przeł. J. Kramsztyk, t. 2, Warszawa 1982.
Google Scholar
Mączyński P., Baj L., Robotnicy żądają podwyżek. Firmy podniosą ceny, „Gazeta Wyborcza” 2007, 14 V.
Google Scholar
Michnik A., Kościół, lewica, dialog, Warszawa 1998.
Google Scholar
Mill J.S., Mill H.T., Subjection of Women, Portland 2009.
Google Scholar
Monbiot G., Neoliberalism. The Ideology at the Root of All Our Problems, „The Guardian” 2016, 16 V, [online] https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot.
Google Scholar
NSZZ „Solidarność”. Komisja Krajowa, [online] http://www.solidarnosc.org.pl/archiwum/ikzd/dokumenty/program/program.pdf.
Google Scholar
Ost D., The Defeat of „Solidarity”. Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe, Ithaca 2005; wyd. pol.: Klęska „Solidarności”. Gniew i polityka w postkomunistycznej Europie, przeł. H. Jankowska, Warszawa 2007, Spectrum.
Google Scholar
Piketty Th., Capital in the Twent-First Century, Cambridge MA–London 2014. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542
Google Scholar
Popper K.R., Unended Quest. An Intellectual Autobiography, London–New York 1992; wyd. pol.: Nieustanne poszukiwania, Autobiografia intelektualna, przeł. A. Chmielewski, Kraków 1997.
Google Scholar
Rawls J., Political Liberalism, New York 1993.
Google Scholar
Russell B., Portrety z pamięci, Wartość wolnej myśli, przeł. A. Chmielewski, Wrocław 1995.
Google Scholar
Saez E., Zucman G., The Triumph of Injustice. How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay, New York 2019.
Google Scholar
Strachey L., Eminent Victorians, San Diego–New York–London 1918.
Google Scholar
The Third Way and Beyond. Criticisms, Futures and Alternatives, red. S. Hale, W. Leggett, L. Martell, Manchester 2004.
Google Scholar
Wolność, nie równość, rozmowa z Januszem Lewandowskim, „Gazeta Wyborcza” 2000, 15-16 I.
Google Scholar
Žižek S., Przekleństwo fantazji, przeł. A. Chmielewski, Wrocław 2001.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.