Standard Arabic – core value or value added ?

Authors

  • Paweł Siwiec Jagiellonian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.44.08

Keywords:

core value, standard Arabic, dialects, dyglossia, identity

Abstract

In the opinion of the vast majority of the Arab society the literary Arabic is considered as a core value. Many even elevate it to the rank of sanctity, due to the fact that it is the language of the Koran. On the other hand Standard Arabic has never become a means of daily communication for all Arabs. It remains the language of written texts, ritual prayers and official speeches, while in everyday life people use dialects. Even Arabic language teachers in the Arab countries, when conducting classes in schools, speak a kind of intermediate Arabic or simply a dialect. In this context, the author tries to answer the question posed in the title of the present article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Paweł Siwiec, Jagiellonian University

Associate Professor at the Jagiellonian University, Kraków (Faculty of International and Political Studies, Institute of the Middle and Far East). Main fields of research: Arabic poetics, classical and contemporary Arabic language, Arabic dialectology.

References

Alghazo, Manal 2007: “Factors Influencing Arabic Language Maintenance In the United States,” Journal of Faculty of Education UAEU 24: 73-101.
Google Scholar

Al-Qurṭ ubī 2006: Al-Ğāmiᶜ li-aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Vol. 22. Ed. by ᶜAbd Allāh Ibn ᶜAbd al-Muḥsin at-Turkī. Beirut: Muᵓassasat ar-Risāla.
Google Scholar

Alshamrani, Hassan 2012: “Diglossia in Arabic TV Stations,” Journal of King Saud University – Languages and Translation 24(1): 57-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksult.2011.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2011.04.002
Google Scholar

As-Suyūṭ ī 1986: Al-Muzhir fī ᶜulūm al-luġa wa-anwāᶜi-ha. Vol. 1. Beirut: Manšūrāt al-Maktaba al-ᶜAṣriyya. Ferguson, Charles A. 1971: Language Structure and Language Use. (Language Science and National Development.) Ed. by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Gomaa, Yasser A. 2011: “Language Maintenance and Transmission: The Case of Egyptian Arabic in Durham, UK,” International Journal of English Linguistics 1(1): 46-53. DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v1n1p46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n1p46
Google Scholar

Haeri, Niloofar 2000: “Form and Ideology: Arabic Sociolinguistics and Beyond,” Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 61-87. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.61
Google Scholar

Hudson, Alan 2002: “Outline of a Theory of Diglossia,” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157: 1-48. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.2002.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2002.039
Google Scholar

Ibn ᶜAsākir 1995: Tārīḫ madīnat Dimašq. Vol. 7. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Google Scholar

Ibn Ḫaldūn 2001: Dīwān al-mubtada’ wa-al-ḫabar fī tārīḫ al-ᶜArab wa-al-Barbar waman ᶜāṣara-hum min ḏawī aš-ša’n al-akbar. Vol. 1. Muqaddima. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Google Scholar

Ibn Manẓ ūr n.d.: Lisān al-ᶜArab. Cairo: Dār al-Maᶜārif.
Google Scholar

Ibrahim , Raphiq 2009: “The Cognitive Basis of Diglossia in Arabic: Evidence from a Repetition Priming Study within and between Languages,” Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2: 93-105. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S5138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S5138
Google Scholar

Ibrahim, Raphiq 2011: “Literacy Problems in Arabic: Sensitivity to Diglossia in Tasks Involving Working Memory,” Journal of Neurolinguistics 24(5): 571-582. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.003
Google Scholar

Khami s D akwar, Reem 2005: “Children’s Attitudes Towards the Diglossic Situation in Arabic and its Impact on Learning,” Languages, Communities, and Education 2: 75-86.
Google Scholar

The Koran: The Koran 1909. (Everyman’s Library. Philosophy & Theology. 380.) Transl. by J.M. Rodwell. London/New York: J.M. Dent/E.P. Dutton.
Google Scholar

al-Mūsā, Nihād 2007: Al-luġa al-ᶜarabiyya fī al-ᶜaṣr al-ḥadīṯ, qiyam aṯ-ṯubūt wa-quwā at-taḥawwul. Amman: Dār aš-Šurūq.
Google Scholar

Yūnis ᶜAlī, Maḥmūd Muḥammad 2004: “Azmat al-luġa wa-muškilat at-taḫalluf fī bunyat al-ᶜaql al-ᶜarabī al-uᶜāṣir,” Mağallat Ğāmiᶜat Umm al-Qurā li-ᶜUlūm aš-Šarīᶜā waal-Luġa al-ᶜArabiyya wa-Ādābi-hā 17/29: 659-707.
Google Scholar

Zakkariyā S aᶜīd, Nafūsa 1964: Tārīḫ ad-daᶜwa ilā al-ᶜāmmiyya wa-āṯāru-hā fī Miṣr. Alexandria: Dār Našr aṯ-Ṯaqāfa. <http://www.saaid.net/arabic/355.htm>.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-10-18

How to Cite

Siwiec, Paweł. 2016. “Standard Arabic – Core Value or Value Added ?”. Politeja 13 (5 (44):121-29. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.44.08.