Why Refer to the Hindus in Bangladesh as a “minority”?

Authors

  • Mahmudul H. Sumon Jahangirnagar University, Savar Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.21

Keywords:

Colonialism, Governmentality, Communalism, South Asia

Abstract

In this paper I problematize the notion of majority/ minority and try to argue that much of this construction can be shown to have links with forms of colonial governmentality in South Asia. Using relevant literature, the paper discusses how categories such as “minority” or “majority” came into being and were normalized through different technologies of power in post‑colonial states such as ours. Such constructions, when taken uncritically, can pose problems for the communities to which they refer. The paper indicates that nomenclature is an important issue and one needs to be careful about the terms they use, as they may have a far‑reaching effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Mahmudul H. Sumon, Jahangirnagar University, Savar Dhaka

Is an Associate Professor of Anthropolog y, Jahangirnagar University, Savar Dhaka. He has a Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University of Kent at Canterbury, UK. His core research interests include: ethnicity, identity formation and agency.

References

Bourdieu P., ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’ in idem, In Other Words. Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, trans. by M. Adamson, Stanford 1990.
Google Scholar

Chakrabarty D., Habitations of Modernity. Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies, Delhi 2002.
Google Scholar

Chatterjee P., The Nation and its Fragments. Colonial and Postcolonial Histories, Princeton 1993 (Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691201429
Google Scholar

Chandhoke N., Review of Chatterjee, Partha, Empire and Nation: Selected Essays and Kaviraj, Sudipta, The Imaginary Institution of India: Politics and Ideas. H‑Asia, H‑Net Reviews. August, 2010, at .
Google Scholar

Cohn B.S., ‘The Census, Social Structure and Objectification in South Asia’ in idem, An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays, Delhi 1987 (Oxford India Paperbacks).
Google Scholar

Foucault M., ‘Governmentality’ in The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954‑1984, Vol. 3: Power, ed. J.D. Faubion, New York 2000.
Google Scholar

Guhathakurata M., ‘Minorities, Migration and National Identity in Bangladesh: Negotiating Power,’ The Journal of Social Studies, Vol. 121 (2009).
Google Scholar

Inda J.X. (ed.), Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics, Oxford 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470775875
Google Scholar

Hayden R.M. ‘Antagonistic Tolerance: Competitive Sharing of Religious Sites in South Asia and the Balkans’, Current Anthropology, Vol. 43, No. 2 (2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/338303
Google Scholar

Kaviraj S., ‘The Imaginary Institution of India’ in P. Chatterjee, G. Pandey (eds.), Subaltern Studies, Vol. 7: Writings on South Asian History and Society, Delhi 1992.
Google Scholar

Khan N., ‘Review of Faisal Devji, Muslim Zion: Pakistan as a Political Idea, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013,’ American Historical Review, Vol. 119, No. 5 (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/119.5.1663
Google Scholar

Pandey G., The Construction of Communalism in Colonial North India, Delhi 1990.
Google Scholar

Pandey G., ‘In Defense of the Fragment: Writing about Hindu‑Muslim Riots in India Today,’ Representations, No. 37 (1992), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2928653>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928653
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-02-05

How to Cite

Sumon, Mahmudul H. 2016. “Why Refer to the Hindus in Bangladesh As a ‘minority’?”. Politeja 13 (1 (40):341-48. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.21.