Difficult Neighbourhood: the Key Objectives of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Towards India in the Twenty‑First Century

Authors

  • Agnieszka Kuszewska University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.25

Keywords:

Pakistan’s foreign policy, Kashmir conflict, India‑Pakistan relations

Abstract

What role does India play in Pakistan’s international strategy? The article tackles this question and explores the crucial elements of Islamabad’s policy towards India, focusing on selected internal and external security issues. Pakistani political/military leaders look upon India as its major security challenge. The alleged threat from the powerful neighbour has served as the convenient explanation for justifying enormous military expenditures and building powerful army in Pakistan, which substantially weakened democratic institutions and civilian governments and consolidated military’s grip of the state power. This sense of fear was fuelled by the catastrophist mindset, claiming that India has always regarded partition of the subcontinent as a “historical aberration” and its main goal was to undo the partition or at least to subjugate Pakistan into a client‑state. The protracted, war‑prone relations between the two nuclear states can be defined as “difficult neighbourhood.” The chapter approaches the problem of Pakistan’s policy towards India in several key parts. The introduction looks at the historical developments and current internal situation in Pakistan. The first part offers an in‑depth analysis of Pakistan’s attitude towards the Kashmir issue, the second part analyses the strategies aimed at counterbalance India’s hegemony in the region, encapsulating the phenomenon of Pakistan‑China and Pakistan‑U.S. relations. The last part briefly observes the problem of water scarcity in India‑Pakistan relations, which has a direct impact on South Asian security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Agnieszka Kuszewska, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw

    Is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Department of Social Sciences and Humianities). She is also an expert on South Asia at Warsaw-based think tank Poland-Asia Research Centre and member of European Security Institute (EIB). Her area of expertise concerns contemporary international relations, international conflicts, terrorism, security dilemmas, foreign/internal policy strategies and the role of South Asia (particularly India and Pakistan) in international affairs. She has published many articles, policy papers in these areas, as well as three monographs (in Polish).

References

Amin‑Khan T., Genealogy of the Post‑Colonial State in India and Pakistan, Lahore 2013.

Avoiding Water Wars: Water Scarcity and Central Asia’s Growing Importance for Stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 22 February 2011, at <http://www.foreign.senate.gov/publications/download/s‑prt‑112‑10‑avoiding‑water‑wars‑water‑scarcity‑and‑centrals‑asias‑growing‑importance‑for‑stability‑in‑afghanistan‑and‑pakistan>.

Bergen P., ‘The FP Survey: Terrorism,’ Foreign Policy, 2 January 2011, at <http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/02/the_fp_survey_terrorism?page=0,0>.

Chakma B., ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Doctrine and Command and Control System: Dilemmas of Small Nuclear Forces in the Second Atomic Age,’ Security Challenges Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2006).

Chakma B., Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons, New York 2009.

Foreign Policy Objectives, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Pakistan, at <http://www.mofa.gov.pk/content.php?pageID=objectives>.

Ganguly S., ‘Beyond the Nuclear Dimension: Forging Stability in South Asia,’ Arms Control Today, No. 4 (2001).

Gaur M., Foreign Policy Annual, New Delhi 2005.

Ghumman K., ‘Cabinet Approves National Security Policy,’ Dawn, 27 February 2014.

Hassan M., ‘Pakistan “Received $25.91b” from US since 9/11,’ The Nation, 27 June 2013, at <http://www.nation.com.pk/national/27‑Jun‑2013/pakistan‑received‑25‑91b‑from‑us‑since‑9‑11>.

Hippler J., ‘Pakistan – Ein gescheiterter Staat?’ in B. Chiari, C. Schetter (eds.), Pakistan, München 2010 (Wegweiser zur Geschichte).

Inbar E., Frisch H., Radical Islam and International Security. Challenges and Responses, New York 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938409

‘India Imposed War on Pak by Constructing Illegal Dams: Saeed,’ The Indian Express, 7 March 2010, at <http://www.indianexpress.com/news/india‑imposed‑war‑on‑pak‑by‑constructing‑ill/587880/>.

‘Indian Water Terrorism: Greater Threat Than Taliban: Pakistan,’ Thaindian News, 5 May 2009, at <http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/south‑asia/indian‑water‑terrorism‑greater‑threat‑than‑taliban‑pakistan_100188486.html>.

Khan R.M., Afghanistan and Pakistan. Conflict, Extremism, and Resistance to Modernity, Karachi 2011.

Mohanty T.R., ‘FATA: Pernicious Policies,’ South Asia Intelligence Review, Vol. 12, No. 34 (2014), at <http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/sair/Archives/sair12/12_34.htm#assessment1>.

Musharraf Speech Highlights, BBC News, 12 January 2002, at <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1757251.stm>.

‘Pakistan Is Always Seen as the Rogue,’ Der Spiegel, 4 October 2010, at <http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,721110,00.html>.

‘Pakistan Says Jammu and Kashmir not Integral Part of India,’ India Today, 11 October 2011, at <http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pakistan‑says‑jammu‑and‑kashmir‑not‑integral‑part‑of‑india/1/154476.html>.

Response in US Senate Report: Water War in South Asia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Pakistan, at <http://www.mofa.gov.pk/pr‑details.php?prID=873>.

Roy B., ‘Enhanced Sino‑Pak Military and Strategic Cooperation,’ Chennai Centre for China Studies, 10 March 2011, at <http://www.c3sindia.org/pakistan/2186>.

Shaukat S., ‘India’s Water Terrorism,’ The Nation, 15 February 2010, at <http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan‑news‑newspaper‑daily‑english‑online/Opinions/Columns/15‑Feb‑2010/Indias‑water‑terrorism>.

Staff Country Reports. Pakistan: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington 2010.

Suroor H., ‘Terror Training Camps Still Operating on India‑Pak Border: WikiLeaks,’ The Hindu, 4 February 2011, at <http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article1156588.ece>.

Tan T.Y., Kudaisya G., The Aftermath of Partition in South Asia, London–New York 2000.

Tudor M., The Promise of Power. The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan, New York 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519076

UNMOGIP. United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan, at <http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unmogip/background.shtml>.

‘WikiLeaks: Kayani Plotted to Topple Zardari,’ Rediff News, 2 December 2010, at <http://www.rediff.com/news/slide‑show/slide‑show‑1‑wikileaks‑kayani‑planned‑to‑topple‑zardari/20101201.htm>.

Yusuf H., Pakistan. A Study of Political Developments 1947‑1997, Lahore 1999.

Downloads

Published

05-02-2016

How to Cite

“Difficult Neighbourhood: The Key Objectives of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Towards India in the Twenty‑First Century”. 2016. Politeja 13 (1 (40): 415-34. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.25.

Funding data

Similar Articles

1-10 of 681

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.