Trust in the Process of Cooperation between the Citizens and the State in Contemporary Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.62.03Keywords:
Russia, society, state, lack of trust, cooperation, trust-level dynamicsAbstract
The author claims that contemporary cooperation between the state and a citizen in Russia is evolving from a state-centralist model to a kind of partnership. The degree and quality of the state’s cooperation is determined by the hybrid nature of the Russian political system – a combination of elements of democratic institutions and autocratic methods of governance. Cooperation between the state and a citizen should be discussed in the context of attaining the opportunities for cooperation between the citizens and the state in order to achieve general aims, as a means of resolving problems. The author holds the opinion that cooperation can be not only an expression of solidarity, but also a testament to peaceful coexistence (not aimed at wrangling). What serves as an indicator of such cooperation between the state and a citizen is trust in the authorities. It should be said that in the conditions of unconsolidated democratic culture of cooperation between the state and the society, the attitude of the majority of citizens to the contemporary political authorities in Russia is, to a high degree, based on trust in Vladimir Putin. However, the noticeable decrease in the level of trust to certain institutions of authority is a result of the inaction, immorality, and corruption of certain groups of policymakers or representatives of the authorities. One of the major challenges of the authorities is how to increase social trust in political institutions.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Bierdiajew N., Russkaja idieja, Sankt-Pietierburg 2018.
Google Scholar
Biespartocznyj D.B., Dowierije w sistiemie socyalnych otnoszenij nasielenija riegiona, Moskwa 2012.
Google Scholar
“Boleje połowiny rossijan obwiniajut czinownikow wo łży o położenii dieł w stranie”, Lewada-Centr, 11 February 2019, at <https://www.levada.ru/2019/02/11/boleepoloviny-rossiyan-obvinyayut-chinovnikov-vo-lzhi-o-polozhenii-del-v-strane/>.
Google Scholar
Cybulewskaja O.I. (ed.), Wzaimodiejstwije grażdanskogo obszczestwa i gosudarstwa w Rossii: prawowoje izmierienije, Saratow 2013.
Google Scholar
Czernobiel G.T., “Grażdanskoje obszczestwo i gosudarstwo: princypy wzaimodiejstwija (tieorie-ticzeskij aspiekt)”, Agrarnoje i ziemielnoje prawo, no. 1 (2013).
Google Scholar
“Diejatielnost’ gosudarstwiennych institutow”, WCYOM. Riejtingi i indieksy, at <https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/odobrenie_deyatelnosti_gosudarstvennyx_institutov/>.
Google Scholar
Diemuszyna O.N., “Elektronnoje uczastije grażdan: riegionalnyj urowien’ (na primierie Wołgogradskoj obłasti)”, Mir ekonomiki i uprawlenija, vol. 17, no. 4 (2017), https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2017-17-4-190-200.
Google Scholar
Diurkgiejm E., O razdielenii obszczestwiennogo truda, Moskwa 2011.
Google Scholar
“Dowierije k politikam”, WCYOM. Riejtingi i indieksy, at <https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/doverie_politikam/>.
Google Scholar
Frank S.Ł., Duchownyje osnowyobszczestwa Wwiedienije w socyalnuju fiłosofiju, Pariż 1930.
Google Scholar
Fukujama F., Dowierije: socyalnyje dobrodietieli i putʹ k procwietaniju, Moskwa 2004.
Google Scholar
Giddiens E., “Posledstwija modierniti”, in W.Ł. Inoziemcew (ed.), Nowaja postindustrialnaja wołna na Zapadie. Antołogija, Moskwa 1999.
Google Scholar
Grinin Ł.G., “Formacyi i cywilizacyi: socyalno-politiczeskije, etniczeskije i duchownyje aspiekty socyołogii istorii”, Fiłosofija i obszczestwo, no. 5 (1997).
Google Scholar
“God raboty w cyfrach i faktach: obzor Obszczestwiennoj pałaty RF”, Obszczestwiennaja pałata Rossijskoj Fiedierac, 22 May 2018, at <https://www.oprf.ru/press/news/2018/newsitem/45346>.
Google Scholar
Konstitucyja Rossijskoj Fiedieracyi, Moskwa 2019.
Google Scholar
“‘Lewada-centr’: rossijanie poczuwstwowali bolsze otwietstwiennosti za proischodiaszczeje w stranie”, Nowaja gazieta, 31 October 2018, at <https://www.novayagazeta.ru/news/2018/10/31/146388-levada-tsentr-rossiyane-pochuvstvovali-bolshe-otvetstvennosti-za-proishodyaschee-v-strane>.
Google Scholar
Łuman N., Socyalnyje sistiemy. Oczerk obszczej tieorii, transl. by I.D. Gazijew, Sankt-Pietierburg 2007.
Google Scholar
Marshall T.H., Class, Citizen and Social Development, with an introduction by S.M. Lipset, Garden City, N.Y. 1964.
Google Scholar
Nooteboom B., Trust. Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures, Сheltenham 2002, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781950883.
Google Scholar
Plesowskich S.N., Fienomien dowierija w rossijskom obszczestwie: socyołogiczeskije osnowy i diagnostika, Moskwa 2004.
Google Scholar
“Priess-wypusk № 3610”, WCYOM. Riejtingi i indieksy, 20 March 2018, at <https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116755>.
Google Scholar
Radikow I.W., “Politiczeskij strach kak faktor sowriemiennoj politiki”, Włast’, vol. 25, no. 4 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ringien S., Narod djawołow: diemokraticzeskije lidiery i problema powinowienija, Moskwa 2016.
Google Scholar
Szestopał Je.B., “Politiczeskaja powiestka dnia rossijskoj własti i jeѐ wosprijatije grażdanami”, Politiczeskije issledowanija, no. 2 (2011).
Google Scholar
Sztompka P., Dowierije – osnowa obszczestwa, Moskwa 2012.
Google Scholar
“Ukaz Priezidienta RF ot 25.04.2019 N 193 Ob ocenkie effiektiwnosti diejatielnosti wysszych dołżnostnych lic (rukowoditielej wysszych ispołnitielnych organow gosudarstwiennoj własti) subjektow Rossijskoj Fiedieracyi i diejatielnosti organow ispoł-nitielnoj własti subjektow Rossijskoj Fiedieracyi”, at <http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_323451/>.
Google Scholar
Urbinati N., Iskażennaja diemokratija. Mnienije, istina i narod, transl. by D. Kraleczkin, Moskwa 2016.
Google Scholar
“Wystuplenije na otkrytii Grażdanskogo foruma”, Priezidient Rossii, 21 November 2001, at <http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/21408>.
Google Scholar
“Wystuplenije na plenarnom zasiedanii Foruma aktiwnych grażdan ‘Soobszczestwo’”, Priezidient Rossii, 3 November 2017, at <http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/55994>.
Google Scholar
Zajcew A.W., “Diałogiczeskij dieficyt w sfierie kommunikacyi i swiaziej s obszczestwiennostju gosudarstwa i grażdanskogo obszczestwa w sowriemiennoj Rossii”, Wiestnik Siewiero-Wostocznogo fiedieralnogo uniwiersitieta im. M.K. Ammosowa, vol. 11, no. 1 (2014).
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.