The Institutional Balance: a Janus-faced concept of EU constitutional law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.07Keywords:
Institutional balance, European integration, representative theory, checks and balances, separation of powers theoryAbstract
The concept of institutional balance is an original theory associated with the development of the EU institutional structure. This article offers a critical analysis of the different uses of the concept. While doing that, the article provides representative samples of the ways in which the concept has been used in the processes of the European integration, including its practical implementation by the European Court of Justice. Our argument is that, in its current state, the concept of institutional balance serves both reactive and transformative functions within the EU law. It emphasises the necessity to periodically check and adjust the power distribution architecture in response to new challenges of the EU evolution process. Moreover, it serves as a conceptual vehicle through which different power configurations within the EU context may be both criticized and legitimized.
Downloads
References
Aleinikoff T.A., ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 96, No. 5 (1987), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/796529>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796529
Alexy R., Theory of Constitutional Rights, transl. by J. Rivers, Oxford 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1042
Christiansen Th., ‘The European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: An Elusive “Institutional Balance?”’ in A. Biondi, P. Eeckhout, S. Ripley (eds.), EU Law after Lisbon, Oxford 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.003.0011
Conway G., ‘Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union’, European Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2011), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
Corbett R., Vigo Í.M. de, Report on the Treaty of Lisbon (European Parliament, Committee on Constitutional Affairs, A6-0013/2008), Jan. 29, 2008.
Craig P., Búrca G. de, The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford 1999.
Curtin D., Executive Power in the European Union. Law, Practices, and the Living Constitution, Oxford 2009 (The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law).
Curtin D., ‘The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1 (1993).
Devuyst Yu., ‘The European Union’s Institutional Balance after the Treaty of Lisbon: “Community Method” and “Democratic Deficit” Reassessed’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 39, No. 2 (2008).
Douglas-Scott S., Constitutional Law of the European Union, Harlow 2002.
Fritzsche A., ‘Discretion, Scope of Judicial Review and Institutional Balance in European Law’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2010).
Georgopoulos Th., ‘The “Checks and Balances” Doctrine in Member States as a Rule of EC Law: The Cases of France and Germany’, European Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 5 (2003), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0386.2003.00191.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0386.2003.00191.x
Guillermin G., ‘Le principe de l’équilibre dans la jurisprudence de CJCE’, Journal du Droit International, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1992).
Hamilton A., Madison J., Jay J., The Federalist Papers, New York 1961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674332133
Hoffmann L., ‘Constitutional Expectations and the European Union: The Issue of Executive Opacity in the Union’s Continuous Constitutionalisation Process’, at <http://www.uaces.org/documents/papers/1102/hoffmann.pdf>.
Jacqué J.-P., ‘The Principle of Institutional Balance’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 2 (2004).
Kreher A., ‘Agencies in the European Community: A Step towards Administrative Integration of Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1997). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769709696340
Lang J.T., Gallagher E., ‘The Commission, the “Community Method”, and the Smaller Member States’, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 5 (2006).
Lenaerts K., Verhoeven A., ‘Institutional Balance as a Guarantee for Democracy in EU Governance’ in C. Joerges, R. Dehousse (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford 2002 (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 11/2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0002
Magnette P., ‘La grande transformation de l’Europe’ in P. Magnette, E. Remacle (eds.), Le nouveau modèle européen, Vol. 1: Institutions et gouvernance, Bruxelles 2000 (Études Européennes).
Menon A., Weatherill S., Democratic Politics in a Globalising World. Supranationalism and Legitimacy in the European Union, London 2007 (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 13/2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1021218
Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 September 2013 (1), Case C-270/12 United Kingdom v European Parliament and Council of the European Union, at <http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf ?docid=140965&doclang=EN>.
Pedler R., Schaefer G. (eds.), Shaping European Law and Policy. The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process, Maastricht 1996.
Peers S., Costa M., ‘Accountability for Delegated and Implementing Acts after the Treaty of Lisbon’, European Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3 (2012), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00607.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00607.x
Pescatore P., ‘Les travaux du “groupe juridique” dans la négociation des traités de Rome’, Studia Diplomatica, Vol. 34, No. 168 (1981).
Petersmann E.-U., ‘Proposals for a New Constitution for the European Union: Building Blocks for a Constitutional Theory and Constitutional Law of the EU’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 5 (1995).
Prechal S., ‘Institutional Balance: A Fragile Principle with Uncertain Content’ in T. Heukels, N. Blokker, M. Brus (eds.), The European Union after Amsterdam. A Legal Analysis, The Hague 1998.
Prodi R., ‘The State of the Union in 2001, address before the European Parliament’, Bulletin of the European Union, No. 1/2 (2001).
Rosas A., Armati L., EU Constitutional Law. An Introduction, Oxford 2010.
Rossi L.S., ‘A New Inter-Institutional Balance: Supranational vs. Intergovernmental Method after the Lisbon Treaty’, Global Jean Monnet-ECSA WORLD Conference “The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon”, Brussels, 25-26 May 2010, at <http://www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/protected/Ross/Rossi-Global-Jean-Monnet-paper.pdf>.
Sbragia A., ‘The European Community: A Balancing Act’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 23, No. 3 (1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3330840
‘Schuman Declaration and the Birth of Europe. Speech of 9 May 1950’, Schuman Project, at <http://www.schuman.info>.
Shapiro D., Federalism. A Dialogue, Evanston 1995.
Smismans S., ‘Institutional Balance as Interest Representation. Some Reflections on Lenaerts and Verhoeven’ in C. Joerges, R. Dehousse (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford 2002 (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 11/2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0003
Thody Ph., A Historical Introduction to the European Union, London 1997.
Tugendhat Ch., Making Sense of Europe, London 1986.
Verhoeven A., The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory, The Hague 2002 (European Monographs, 38).
Wallace H., ‘The Institutional Setting: Five Variations on a Theme’ in H. Wallace, W. Wallace (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford 2000 (The New European Union Series).
Warleigh A. (ed.), Understanding European Union Institutions, London 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470909
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
