Socio-economic Status, Territory and Political Participation in Twenty-First- Century Mexico
Keywords:political participation, socio‑economic status, territory, Mexico
This article is built on the reflections that the authors have had during their latest research on political participation in several municipalities of Mexico. Thus, based on the ethnographies conducted between 2006 and 2016, mainly in the town of Xico (Veracruz state), we set up as analyzing unities specific political interactions (including patronizing) among Mexican citizens within the five types recognized by Social Sciences: voting, campaigning, contacting political officials, working on public affairs and talking about politics. On this basis, we explore the articulation of the aforementioned interactions and, more specifically, of the roles adopted by the interacting citizens as identity markers linking these people in a highlighted way with a series of socio‑economic and socio‑territorial features, dimensions that, ultimately, turn out inseparable from the existing power relations in the local societies. In conclusion, we are of the opinion that, together with indicators of income, education, professional category or living nearby territory, it can be affirmed that the political behavior in Mexico is shown as both socio‑economic indicator and socio‑territorial belonging not because parties represent interests of class, but because there are well defined spheres of political behavior depending on the socio‑economic stratum and the socio‑territorial belonging of the individual.
Badie B., Hermet G., Política comparada, México 1993.
Curtis J., Spencer J., “Anthropology and the Politics,” in R. Fardon, J. Glendhill (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology, London 2012, pp. 168‑182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201077.n13
Davidson W.B., Cotte P.R., “Sense of Community and Political Participation,” Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 17, no. 2 (1989), pp. 119‑125, https://doi.org/10.1002/1520‑6629(198904)17:2<119::AID‑JCOP2290170203>3.0.CO;2‑C. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198904)17:2<119::AID-JCOP2290170203>3.0.CO;2-C
Formisano R.P., “The Concept of Political Culture,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 31, no. 3 (2001), pp. 393‑426, http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002219500551596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002219500551596
Fröhling O., Gallaher C., Jones J.P., “Imagining the Mexican Election,” Antipode, vol. 33, no. 1 (2001), pp. 1‑16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00155
Giménez G., “Cultura, territorio y migraciones. Aproximaciones teóricas,” Alteridades, vol. 11, no. 22 (2001), pp. 5‑14.
González‑Fuente I., “Community, Cargo System, and Social Project. An Analytical Proposal of Local Societies in Mexico,” AIBR. Journal of Iberoamerican Anthroology, vol. 6, no. 1 (2011), pp. 81‑104, https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.060105e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.060105e
González‑Fuente I., Paleta G., “Discursos y prácticas del Buen Convivir en un contexto de post‑violencia en Michoacán (México),” OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, vol. 13, no. 2 (2019), pp. 407‑436, https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2019.14.2.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2019.14.2.05
Gough I., “Economic Institutions and the Satisfaction of Human Needs,” Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 28, no. 1 (1994), pp. 25‑66, https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1994.11505519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1994.11505519
Hagene T., González‑Fuente I., “Deep Politics: Community Adaptations to Political Clientelism in Twenty‑First‑Century Mexico,” Latin American Research Review, vol. 51, no. 2 (2016), pp. 3‑23, https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2016.0019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2016.0019
Holzner C.A., “The Poverty of Democracy: Neoliberal Reforms and Political Participation of the Poor in Mexico,” Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 2 (2007), pp. 87‑122, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548‑2456.2007.tb00408.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lap.2007.0021
Lazar S., “Personalist Politics, Clientelism and Citizenship: Local Elections in El Alto, Bolivia,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 23, no. 2 (2004), pp. 228‑243, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470‑9856.2004.00106.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00106.x
Lomnitz L., “Horizontal and Vertical Relations and the Social Structure of Urban Mexico,” Latin American Research Review, vol. 17, no. 2 (1982), pp. 51‑74, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2503145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100033641
Lomnitz L. Adler de, Salazar R., Adler I., Symbolism and Ritual in a One‑party Regime: Unveiling Mexico’s Political Culture, transl. by S.A. Wagner, Tucson 2010.
Magaloni B., Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico, Cambridge 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510274
Montanbeault F., “Overcoming Clientelism Through Local Participatory Institutions in Mexico: What Type of Participation?,” Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 53, no. 1 (2011), pp. 91‑124, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548‑2456.2011.00110.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00110.x
Seffer K., “Clientelism a Stumbling Block for Democratization? Lessons from Mexico,” Latin American Perspectives, vol. 42, no. 5 (2015), pp. 198‑215, https//doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14547511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14547511
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.