“Beware of Pity”
On the Insidious Role of Pity in Private and Public Life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2023.87.11Keywords:
pity, compassion, the French Revolution, Arendt, public sphereAbstract
The title of this article alludes to the famous novel by Stefan Zweig Ungeduld des Herzens (translated into English as “Beware of Pity”). The novel illustrates the destructive role that pity plays in our private life, but, as will be argued in the article, the role of pity can be equally destructive in public life. The first part of the article has a conceptual character – the distinction is made therein between two types of pity: (1) as “the heart’s impatience (Ungeduld des Herzens)” to “rid itself as quickly as possible of the painful experience of being moved by another person’s suffering (Stefan Zweig, Beware of Pity, p. 19)”; and (2) as a mixture of contempt towards the sufferer and increased sense of one’s own power. What these two types of pity have in common is that they are self-regarding, that is, not having as its ultimate aim the well-being of the suffering person, and in fact preserving distance to the sufferer. This feature distinguishes them from compassion – a truly other-regarding fellow-feeling with the sufferer. The second part of the article, inspired by Zweig’s novel, will trace the negative consequences of pity in our private lives. The third part will strive, first, to reconstruct Hannah Arendt’s argumentation (presented in her book On Revolution) for her critical evaluation of pity as a political emotion, and secondly, to develop it in some new directions (inter alia, drawing on the above distinction between two types of pity, which is absent in Arendt’s analysis). Finally, it will be argued that even though in private life empathy (broadly understood) does not have to take the form of pity (it often assumes the laudable form of compassion), it is almost bound to take the form of pity in political life. If this claim is true, it means that one needs to treat with much caution the oft-made postulates of increasing the role of ‘empathy’ in public life.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Arendt H., On Violence, San Diego–New York–London 1970.
Google Scholar
Arendt H., On Revolution, London 1990.
Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen S., The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty, New York 2011.
Google Scholar
Baszkiewicz J., Robespierre, Wrocław 1989.
Google Scholar
Baszkiewicz J., Nowy człowiek, nowy naród, nowy świat. Mitologia i rzeczywistość rewolucji francuskiej, Warszawa 1993.
Google Scholar
Belloc H., The French Revolution, Milwauekee–Wisconsin 2018 [1911].
Google Scholar
Cartwright D.E., “Schopenhauer’s Compassion and Nietzsche’s Pity,” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, vol. 69 (1988), pp. 557-567.
Google Scholar
Degerman D., “Within the Heart’s Darkness: The Role of Emotions in Arendt’s Political Thought,” European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 18(2) (2019), pp. 153-173, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116647850.
Google Scholar
Hibbert Ch., The French Revolution, London 1982.
Google Scholar
Mercer P., Sympathy and Ethics. A Study of the Relationship between Sympathy and Morality with Special Reference to Hume’s Treatise, Oxford 1972.
Google Scholar
Shapiro B.M., “Self-Sacrifice, Self-Interest, or Self-Defense? The Constituent Assembly and the ‘Self-Denying Ordinance’ of May 1791,” French Historical Studies, vol. 25(4) (2002), pp. 625-656, https://doi.org/10.1215/00161071-25-4-625.
Google Scholar
Talmon J., The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy, New York 1952.
Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, The Summa Theologica, transl. by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Westminster, Md. 1981. de Tocqueville A., The Old Régime and the Revolution, transl. by S. Gilbert, New York 1983.
Google Scholar
Walton D., Appeal to Pity: Argumentum ad Misericordiam, New York 1997.
Google Scholar
Zweig S., Beware of Pity (Ungeduld des Herzens), transl. by A. Bell, London 2011 (1939).
Google Scholar
Załuski W. “On Three Types of Empathy: The Perfect, the Truncated, and the Contaminated,” Logos i Ethos, vol. 45, no. 2 (2017), pp. 51-66, https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.2361.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.