Europeanness among Polish civil society activists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.49.05Keywords:
biographical research, discourse analysis, civic engagement, European mental spaceAbstract
The European discourse is not only a powerful idea at the structural societal level, it is also pragmatically used, re‑produced and transformed through the everyday actions of people with specific biographies.1 In this paper, I would like to address the question how Europeanness – i.e. relating to Europe and/or being European – develops during one’s life course. I propose a qualitative sociological approach and the methodology of discourse research2 and biographical analysis. 3 The empirical cases to be discussed are social actors who perceive themselves to be civil society activists. As such, they are actively involved in the public arena, thereby contributing to the development of public and media discourses. They talk about Europe from the perspective of specific biographies that have to be reconstructed if we are to understand the genesis of their Europeanness. In analysing the biographies of civil society activists in post‑socialist Poland, two ideal types could be reconstructed that apply to both the activity and the Europeanness: a) a pragmatic, skill and qualification‑related type and b) an idealistic, empowerment and emancipation‑related type. In order to discuss these two types, I shall first outline the methodology applied and the empirical material. I will then focus on the narratives, using the framework of biographical and discourse analysis in the sociology of knowledge tradition. My conclusion summarises the biographical development of Europeanness of Polish civil society activists.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Alber I., “Creating Civil Society. Democracy Promotion in Transnational Contexts”, in R. Schattkowsky, M. Řezník (eds.), Society and Nation in Transnational Processes in Europe, Cambridge 2015.
Google Scholar
Alber I., “Doing Civil Society in Post‑socialist Poland. Triangulation of Biographical Analysis and Discourse Analysis”, Przegląd Socjologiczny, vol. 65, no. 4 (2016).
Google Scholar
Alber I., Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement in Polen. Ein biographietheoretischer und diskursanalytischer Zugang, Wiesbaden 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13358-0
Google Scholar
Berger P.L., Luckmann T., The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, N.Y. 1967.
Google Scholar
Best H., Lengyel G., Verzichelli L. (eds.), The Europe of Elites. A Study into the Europeanness of Europe’s Political and Economic Elites, Oxford 2012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602315.001.0001
Google Scholar
Cohen J.L., Arato A., Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge, Mass. 1995.
Google Scholar
Craig G., Mayo M., “Community Participation and Empowerment. The Human Face of Structural Adjustment or Tools for Democratic Transition?”, in iidem (eds.), Community Empowerment.
Google Scholar
A Reader in Participation and Development, London 1995.
Google Scholar
Delanty G., Rumford C., Rethinking Europe. Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization, London 2005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203640050
Google Scholar
Denzin N.K., The Research Act. A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, New York 1978.
Google Scholar
Eriksen E.O., Fossum J.E. (eds.), Rethinking Democracy and the European Union, London–New York 2012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203138083
Google Scholar
EuroIdentities – The Evolution of European Identity. Using Biographical Methods to Study the Development of European Identity, at <https://www.unina.it/documents/11958/4393164/PrgFin_02_Euroidentities.pdf/24549b40‑8455‑46aa‑9c32‑3555b93d50f3>.
Google Scholar
Fuchs‑Heinritz W., Biographische Forschung. Eine Einführung in Praxis und Methoden, Wiesbaden 2005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93733-9
Google Scholar
Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research, New Brunswick 2006.
Google Scholar
Herbst J., “Po co są organizacje?”, 6 May 2011, O Sektorze, at <http://osektorze.ngo.pl/x/631719>.
Google Scholar
Holzer J., “Polen in Europa: Zentrum oder Peripherie?”, in S. Klunkert, B. Lippert, H. Schneider, Europabilder in Mittel‑und Osteuropa. Neue Herausforderungen für die politische Bildung, Bonn 1996.
Google Scholar
Howard M.M., The Weakness of Civil Society in Post‑communist Europe, Cambridge 2002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840012
Google Scholar
Kaiser W., “One Narrative or Several? Politics, Cultural Elites, and Citizens in Constructing a ‘New Narrative for Europe’”, National Identities, vol. 19, no. 2 (2017), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1265491>.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1265491
Google Scholar
Kaiser W., McMahon R., “Narrating European Integration. Transnational Actors and Stories”, National Identities, vol. 19, no. 2 (2017), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1274722>.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1274722
Google Scholar
Kaźmierska K., Piotrowski A., Waniek K., “Biographical Consequences of Working abroad in the Context of European Mental Space Construction”, Przegląd Socjologiczny, vol. 60, no. 1 (2011).
Google Scholar
Keller R., Doing Discourse Research. An Introduction for Social Scientists, transl. by B. Jenner, London 2013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957640
Google Scholar
Keller R., “Entering Discourses: A New Agenda for Qualitative Research and Sociology of Knowledge”, Qualitative Sociology Review, vol. 8, no. 2 (2012).
Google Scholar
Klein A., Der Diskurs der Zivilgesellschaft. Politische Kontexte und demokratietheoretische Bezüge der neueren Begriffsverwendung, Opladen 2001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09597-2
Google Scholar
Klunkert S., “Europabilder in Mittel‑und Osteuropa. Vom Wunschbild zum Abbild der europapolitischen Realität”, in eadem, B. Lippert, H. Schneider (eds.), Europabilder in Mittel‑und Osteuropa. Neue Herausforderungen für die politische Bildung, Bonn 1996.
Google Scholar
“Krótki kurs historii Krytyki Politycznej”, Krytyka Polityczna, 2012, at <http://www.krytykapolityczna.pl/Aktualnosci/KrotkikurshistoriiKrytykiPolitycznej/menuid‑48.html>.
Google Scholar
“Liczba NGO w Polsce”, Fakty o NGO, at <http://fakty.ngo.pl/liczba‑ngo>.
Google Scholar
Linz J.J., Stepan A., Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post‑communist Europe, Baltimore, Md. 1996.
Google Scholar
Mansfeldová Z. et al., “Civil Society in Transition. Civic Engagement and Nonprofit Organizations in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989”, in A. Zimmer, E. Priller (eds.), Future of Civil Society. Making Central European Nonprofit Organizations Work, Wiesbaden 2004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80980-3_7
Google Scholar
Miller R. et al., “Dimensions for the Expression of European Identity”, in R. Miller, G. Day (eds.), The Evolution of European Identities. Biographical Approaches, New York 2012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009272_1
Google Scholar
Open Letter to the European Public Opinion, by members of Polish civil society, Krytyka Polityczna, 2003, at <http://www.krytykapolityczna.pl/English/Open‑Letter‑to‑the‑European‑Public‑Opinion‑by‑members‑of‑Polish‑civil‑society/menu‑id‑113.html>.
Google Scholar
Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekspertów i Asesorów Funduszy Unii Europejskiej, at <http://www.ekspertue.pl/>.
Google Scholar
Przegląd Socjologiczny, special issue, vol. 60, no. 1 (2011).
Google Scholar
Putnam R.D., Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York 2000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
Google Scholar
Quesel C., Soziale Emanzipation. Kollektivismus und Demokratie im Umbruch von der ständischen zur bürgerlichen Gesellschaft in Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main–New York 1994.
Google Scholar
Roberts B., Biographical Research, Buckingham 2002.
Google Scholar
Rosenthal G., “Biographical Research”, in C. Seale, G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice, London 2004.
Google Scholar
Rosenthal G., “A Plea for a More Interpretive, More Empirical, and More Historical Sociology”, in D. Kalekin‑Fishman, A.B. Denis (eds.), The Shape of Sociology for the 21st Century. Tradition and Renewal, London–Thousand Oaks, Calif. 2012.
Google Scholar
Schütz A., Luckmann T., The Structures of the Life‑world, Evanston, Ill. 1989.
Google Scholar
Schütze F., “Biographieforschung und narratives Interview”, Neue Praxis. Kritische Zeitschrift für Sozialarbeit und Sozialpädagogik, vol. 13, no. 3 (1983).
Google Scholar
Schütze F. et al., “Discoverers in European Mental Space. The Biographical Experiences of Participants in European Civil Society Organisations”, in R. Miller, G. Day (eds.), The Evolution of European Identities. Biographical Approaches, New York 2012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009272_9
Google Scholar
Słodkowska I., Społeczeństwo obywatelskie na tle historycznego przełomu. Polska 1980‑1989, Warszawa 2006.
Google Scholar
“What is Political Critique? Co to jest Krytyka Polityczna? Czto takoje Politiczeskaja Kritika?”, Krytyka Polityczna, 2011, at <http://politicalcritique.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/what‑is‑political‑critique.pdf>.
Google Scholar
Załęski P.S., Self‑governing Republic in the Thought of the Solidarity Movement in Poland. Why Solidarity Was Not a Civil Society, Working Papers on the Solidarity Movement, 07/2013, at <http://solidarnosc.collegium.edu.pl/wp‑content/uploads/2013/12/WPSM‑7.pdf>.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
