Europeanness among Polish civil society activists

Authors

  • Ina Alber-Armenat University of Göttingen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.49.05

Keywords:

biographical research, discourse analysis, civic engagement, European mental space

Abstract

The European discourse is not only a powerful idea at the structural societal level, it is also pragmatically used, re‑produced and transformed through the everyday actions of people with specific biographies.1 In this paper, I would like to address the question how Europeanness – i.e. relating to Europe and/or being European – develops during one’s life course. I propose a qualitative sociological approach and the methodology of discourse research2 and biographical analysis. 3 The empirical cases to be discussed are social actors who perceive themselves to be civil society activists. As such, they are actively involved in the public arena, thereby contributing to the development of public and media discourses. They talk about Europe from the perspective of specific biographies that have to be reconstructed if we are to understand the genesis of their Europeanness. In analysing the biographies of civil society activists in post‑socialist Poland, two ideal types could be reconstructed that apply to both the activity and the Europeanness: a) a pragmatic, skill and qualification‑related type and b) an idealistic, empowerment and emancipation‑related type. In order to discuss these two types, I shall first outline the methodology applied and the empirical material. I will then focus on the narratives, using the framework of biographical and discourse analysis in the sociology of knowledge tradition. My conclusion summarises the biographical development of Europeanness of Polish civil society activists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ina Alber-Armenat, University of Göttingen

Received her PhD from the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Georg-August-Universiy of Goettingen. Currently she works as post-doc-researcher and study programme coordinator at the Institute for Sociolog y in Goettingen. Between 2012 and 2015 she was Executive Director of the Leibniz Graduate School ‘History, Knowledge, Media in East Central Europe’ and Scientific Assistant at the Herder Institute for Historical Research on East Central Europe – Institute of the Leibniz Association in Marburg. Her research interests cover the intersections of political science, sociolog y, media and communication and methodolog y, and particularly Central Eastern Europe and post-socialist transformation, interpretative social research, biographi-cal research, discourse and text analysis, methodolog y of qualitative research, sociolg y of knowledge; transnational migration and care work, gender studies, German-Polish relations and cultures of memory, research on democracy, civil society and human rights.

References

Alber I., “Creating Civil Society. Democracy Promotion in Transnational Contexts”, in R. Schattkowsky, M. Řezník (eds.), Society and Nation in Transnational Processes in Europe, Cambridge 2015.

Alber I., “Doing Civil Society in Post‑socialist Poland. Triangulation of Biographical Analysis and Discourse Analysis”, Przegląd Socjologiczny, vol. 65, no. 4 (2016).

Alber I., Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement in Polen. Ein biographietheoretischer und diskursanalytischer Zugang, Wiesbaden 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13358-0

Berger P.L., Luckmann T., The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, N.Y. 1967.

Best H., Lengyel G., Verzichelli L. (eds.), The Europe of Elites. A Study into the Europeanness of Europe’s Political and Economic Elites, Oxford 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602315.001.0001

Cohen J.L., Arato A., Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge, Mass. 1995.

Craig G., Mayo M., “Community Participation and Empowerment. The Human Face of Structural Adjustment or Tools for Democratic Transition?”, in iidem (eds.), Community Empowerment.

A Reader in Participation and Development, London 1995.

Delanty G., Rumford C., Rethinking Europe. Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization, London 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203640050

Denzin N.K., The Research Act. A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, New York 1978.

Eriksen E.O., Fossum J.E. (eds.), Rethinking Democracy and the European Union, London–New York 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203138083

EuroIdentities – The Evolution of European Identity. Using Biographical Methods to Study the Development of European Identity, at <https://www.unina.it/documents/11958/4393164/PrgFin_02_Euroidentities.pdf/24549b40‑8455‑46aa‑9c32‑3555b93d50f3>.

Fuchs‑Heinritz W., Biographische Forschung. Eine Einführung in Praxis und Methoden, Wiesbaden 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93733-9

Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research, New Brunswick 2006.

Herbst J., “Po co są organizacje?”, 6 May 2011, O Sektorze, at <http://osektorze.ngo.pl/x/631719>.

Holzer J., “Polen in Europa: Zentrum oder Peripherie?”, in S. Klunkert, B. Lippert, H. Schneider, Europabilder in Mittel‑und Osteuropa. Neue Herausforderungen für die politische Bildung, Bonn 1996.

Howard M.M., The Weakness of Civil Society in Post‑communist Europe, Cambridge 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840012

Kaiser W., “One Narrative or Several? Politics, Cultural Elites, and Citizens in Constructing a ‘New Narrative for Europe’”, National Identities, vol. 19, no. 2 (2017), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1265491>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1265491

Kaiser W., McMahon R., “Narrating European Integration. Transnational Actors and Stories”, National Identities, vol. 19, no. 2 (2017), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1274722>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1274722

Kaźmierska K., Piotrowski A., Waniek K., “Biographical Consequences of Working abroad in the Context of European Mental Space Construction”, Przegląd Socjologiczny, vol. 60, no. 1 (2011).

Keller R., Doing Discourse Research. An Introduction for Social Scientists, transl. by B. Jenner, London 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957640

Keller R., “Entering Discourses: A New Agenda for Qualitative Research and Sociology of Knowledge”, Qualitative Sociology Review, vol. 8, no. 2 (2012).

Klein A., Der Diskurs der Zivilgesellschaft. Politische Kontexte und demokratietheoretische Bezüge der neueren Begriffsverwendung, Opladen 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09597-2

Klunkert S., “Europabilder in Mittel‑und Osteuropa. Vom Wunschbild zum Abbild der europapolitischen Realität”, in eadem, B. Lippert, H. Schneider (eds.), Europabilder in Mittel‑und Osteuropa. Neue Herausforderungen für die politische Bildung, Bonn 1996.

“Krótki kurs historii Krytyki Politycznej”, Krytyka Polityczna, 2012, at <http://www.krytykapolityczna.pl/Aktualnosci/KrotkikurshistoriiKrytykiPolitycznej/menuid‑48.html>.

“Liczba NGO w Polsce”, Fakty o NGO, at <http://fakty.ngo.pl/liczba‑ngo>.

Linz J.J., Stepan A., Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post‑communist Europe, Baltimore, Md. 1996.

Mansfeldová Z. et al., “Civil Society in Transition. Civic Engagement and Nonprofit Organizations in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989”, in A. Zimmer, E. Priller (eds.), Future of Civil Society. Making Central European Nonprofit Organizations Work, Wiesbaden 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80980-3_7

Miller R. et al., “Dimensions for the Expression of European Identity”, in R. Miller, G. Day (eds.), The Evolution of European Identities. Biographical Approaches, New York 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009272_1

Open Letter to the European Public Opinion, by members of Polish civil society, Krytyka Polityczna, 2003, at <http://www.krytykapolityczna.pl/English/Open‑Letter‑to‑the‑European‑Public‑Opinion‑by‑members‑of‑Polish‑civil‑society/menu‑id‑113.html>.

Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekspertów i Asesorów Funduszy Unii Europejskiej, at <http://www.ekspertue.pl/>.

Przegląd Socjologiczny, special issue, vol. 60, no. 1 (2011).

Putnam R.D., Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Quesel C., Soziale Emanzipation. Kollektivismus und Demokratie im Umbruch von der ständischen zur bürgerlichen Gesellschaft in Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main–New York 1994.

Roberts B., Biographical Research, Buckingham 2002.

Rosenthal G., “Biographical Research”, in C. Seale, G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice, London 2004.

Rosenthal G., “A Plea for a More Interpretive, More Empirical, and More Historical Sociology”, in D. Kalekin‑Fishman, A.B. Denis (eds.), The Shape of Sociology for the 21st Century. Tradition and Renewal, London–Thousand Oaks, Calif. 2012.

Schütz A., Luckmann T., The Structures of the Life‑world, Evanston, Ill. 1989.

Schütze F., “Biographieforschung und narratives Interview”, Neue Praxis. Kritische Zeitschrift für Sozialarbeit und Sozialpädagogik, vol. 13, no. 3 (1983).

Schütze F. et al., “Discoverers in European Mental Space. The Biographical Experiences of Participants in European Civil Society Organisations”, in R. Miller, G. Day (eds.), The Evolution of European Identities. Biographical Approaches, New York 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009272_9

Słodkowska I., Społeczeństwo obywatelskie na tle historycznego przełomu. Polska 1980‑1989, Warszawa 2006.

“What is Political Critique? Co to jest Krytyka Polityczna? Czto takoje Politiczeskaja Kritika?”, Krytyka Polityczna, 2011, at <http://politicalcritique.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/what‑is‑political‑critique.pdf>.

Załęski P.S., Self‑governing Republic in the Thought of the Solidarity Movement in Poland. Why Solidarity Was Not a Civil Society, Working Papers on the Solidarity Movement, 07/2013, at <http://solidarnosc.collegium.edu.pl/wp‑content/uploads/2013/12/WPSM‑7.pdf>.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-31

How to Cite

Alber-Armenat, Ina. 2017. “Europeanness Among Polish Civil Society Activists”. Politeja 14 (4(49):71-85. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.49.05.