Stabilność systemu międzynarodowego – wybrane ujęcia i problemy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.69.04Keywords:
international system, stability, system analysis, research modelsAbstract
Stability of the International System – Selected Issues and Approaches
Classical theoretical concepts offer many possibilities for study the issue of stability of the international system. Therefore, the article presents a brief analysis of the development of this research, but focuses only on selected theoretical models. Despite the constant creation of new concepts and attempts to formalize research on this question, it was not possible to develop common solutions or conclusions. Numerous cognitive problems either resulted from the preliminary assumptions or were a consequence of using simplified research models. That is why theorists, while analyzing the same problems connected with achieving stability at the level of the international system, so often came to different or even opposite conclusions. The aim of this article is to show the diversity of research on stability of the international system, to present some achievements and to try to diagnose the main problems of the discussed theoretical concepts.
Downloads
References
Angell N., The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage, Memphis 2012.
Aron R., Wojna i pokój między narodami, przeł. A. Mielczarek, Warszawa 1995.
Barbieri K., The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace?, Ann Arbor 2005, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.16590.
Bertalanffy L. von, Ogólna teoria systemów. Podstawy, rozwój, zastosowania, przeł. E. Woydyłło-Woźniak, Warszawa 1984.
Collected Papers of Lewis Fry Richardson, red. O.M. Ashford i in., vol. 2: Quantitative Psychology and Studies of Conflict, red. I. Sutherland, Cambridge 1993.
Crucé E., The New Cyneas of Émeric de la Crucé, Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.
Deutsch K.W., Singer J.D., Multipolar Power System and International Stability, „World Politics” 1964, vol. 16, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.2307/2009578.
Dungen P., The Abbé de Saint-Pierre and the English ‘Irenists’ of the 18th Century (Penn, Bellers, and Bentham), „International Journal on World Peace” 2000, vol. 17, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.2307/20753253.
Dunn F.S. i in., The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order, red. B. Brodie, New York 1946.
Dunne A.P., International Theory: To the Brink and Beyond, Westport, Conn. 1996.
Easton D., A System Analysis of Political Life, New York 1965.
Frazier R., Kennan, “Universalism”, and the Truman Doctrine, „Journal of Cold War Studies” 2009, vol. 11, nr 2.
Gaddis J.L., The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, New York–Oxford 1989.
Gaddis J.L., The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System, „International Security” 1986, vol. 10, nr 4.
Gallarotti G.M., The Limits of International Organization: Systematic Failure in the Management of International Relations, „International Organization” 1991, vol. 45, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033063.
Gilpin R., Theory of Hegemonic War, „The Journal of Interdisciplinary History” 1988, vol. 18, nr 4.
Gilpin R., War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge 1981, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267.
Gold E., Lewis Fry Richardson. 1881-1953, „Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society” 1954, vol. 9, nr 1.
Grotius H., O prawie wojny i pokoju. Trzy księgi, w których znajdują wyjaśnienie prawo natury
i prawo narodów a także główne zasady prawa publicznego. Tom 1, przeł. R. Bierzanek, Warszawa 1957.
Grunberg I., Exploring the “Myth” of Hegemonic Stability, „International Organization” 1990, nr 44.
Hamati-Ataya I., The Missed Promises of Systemic Pragmatism, „International Studies Quarterly” 2012, vol. 56, nr 2.
Heilbron J., Auguste Comte and Modern Epistemology, „Sociological Theory” 1990, vol. 8, nr 2.
Hess G.D., An Introduction to Lewis Fry Richardson and His Mathematical Theory of War
and Peace, „Conflict Management and Peace Science” 1995, vol. 14, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/073889429501400104.
Hirschman A.O., The Strategy of Economic Development, London 1988.
James P., Brecher M., Stability and Polarity: New Paths for Inquiry, „Journal of Peace Research” 1988, vol. 25, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338802500104.
Kaloudis G., Could the United Nations Preserve International Peace?, „International Journal on World Peace” 1993, vol. 10, nr 2.
Kant I., Do wiecznego pokoju, [w:] I. Kant, Rozprawy z filozofii historii, przekł. i oprac. Translatorium Filozofii Niemieckiej Instytutu Filozofii Uniwersytetu im. Mikołaja Kopernika pod kierunkiem M. Żelaznego, Kęty 2005, s. 164-203.
Kaplan M.A., System and Process in International Politics, New York 1957.
Keohane R., Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War, [w:] Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, red. D.A. Baldwin, New York 1993.
Keohane R., Martin L.L., The Promise of Institutionalist Theory, „International Security” 1995, vol. 20, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.
Keohane R.O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ 1984.
Kindleberger Ch.P., The World in Depression 1929-1939, Berkeley 1986.
Kissinger H., Porządek światowy, przeł. M. Antosiewicz, Wołowiec 2017.
Kissinger H.A., Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, New York 1957.
Krzyżanowska I., Współzależność a konfliktowość stosunków międzynarodowych, „Politeja” 2007, nr 8.
Layne Ch., Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace, „International Security” 1994, vol. 19, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539195.
Lebow R.N., The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism, „International Organization” 1994.
Leiserson A., Charles Merriam, Max Weber, and the Search for Synthesis in Political Science, „The American Political Science Review” 1975, vol. 69, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/1957898.
McGinnis M.D., Richardson, Rationality, and Restrictive Models of Arms Races, „Journal of Conflict Resolution” 1991, vol. 35, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002791035003003.
Mearsheimer J.J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York–London 2001.
Mearsheimer J.J., Tragizm polityki mocarstw, przeł. P. Nowakowski, J. Sadkiewicz, Kraków 2014.
Miller J.G., Living Systems, New York 1978.
Morgenthau H.J., Polityka między narodami. Walka o potęgę i pokój, oprac. K.W. Thompson, przeł. R. Włoch, Warszawa 2010.
Morgenthau H.J., The Intellectual and Political Functions of Theory, [w:] International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, red. A. Linklater, London–New York 2000.
Nicholson M., Lewis Fry Richardson and Causes of War, „British Journal of Political Science” 1999, vol. 29, nr 3.
Niou E.M.S., Ordeshook P.C., A Theory of the Balance of Power in International Systems, „The Journal of Conflict Resolution” 1986, vol. 30, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002786030004005.
Niou E.M.S., Ordeshook P.C., Rose G.F., The Balance of Power: Stability in International Systems, Cambridge 1989.
Rapoport A., Lewis F. Richardson’s Mathematical Theory of War, „Conflict Resolution” 1957, vol. 1, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275700100301.
Riker W.H., The Theory of Political Coalition, New Haven 1962.
Rosecrance R.N., International Relations: Peace or War?, New York 1973.
Rosecrance R.N., The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World, New York 1986.
Russett B. i in., The Democratic Peace, „International Security” 1995, vol. 19, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539124.
Schelling T.C., The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge 1960.
Smith R.P, The Influence of the Richardson Arms Race Model, [w:] Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Science, red. N.P. Gleditsh, Oslo 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31589-4_3.
Snidal D., The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory, „International Organization” 1985, vol. 39, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X.
Snyder G.H., Mearsheimer’s World – Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security, „International Security” 2002, vol. 27, nr 1.
Spencer H., The Principles of Sociology, vol. 1, New York 1901.
The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, red. Ch. Reus-Smit, D. Snidal, Oxford 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001.
Waltz K.N., Theory of International Politics, Reading, MA 1979.
Waltz K.N., Struktura teorii stosunków międzynarodowych, przeł. R. Włoch, Warszawa 2010.
Waltz K.N., The Stability of a Bipolar World, „Daedalus” 1964, vol. 93, nr 3.
Webb M.C., Krasner S.D., Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment, „Review of International Studies” 1989, vol. 15, nr 2.
Young O.R., International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions, „World Politics” 1986, vol. 39, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/2010300.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
