Universal Human Rights? Historical and Contemporary Comments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.71.01Keywords:
natural law, law of nature, natural rights, human rightsAbstract
The concept of human rights, supposedly of universal importance, is usually derived from the tradition referred to as “Western”. Although the “classic approaches” – Greek, Roman and Christian, refer to the norms of natural law, making them the basis or limits of the rights of individuals, in modern approaches the relation is reserved, in the manner that rights become primary to norms. Although liberals of the 17th and 18th centuries consider the law of nature as a tool for their protection, starting from the 19th century, the rights (already called human rights) have been increasingly perceived as positive abilities to articulate own, subjective preferences of individuals. This evolution needs to be accounted for in the studies carried out by representatives of various cultures, since the comprehension of an individual (and even a “human person”) as an essentially culturally unconditioned one, is its ineradicable element.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Bryk A., Konstytucjonalizm. Od starożytnego Izraela do liberalnego konstytucjonalizmu amerykańskiego, Kraków 2013.
Google Scholar
Copleston F., A History of Philosophy. Ockham to Suárez, vol. 3, Mahwah, N.J.–Tunbridge Wells 1953.
Google Scholar
D’Entrèves A.P., Natural Law. An Introduction to Legal Philosophy, London 1957.
Google Scholar
Figgis J.N., Studies of Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius. 1414-1625, Cambridge 1931.
Google Scholar
Gilson É., Duch filozofii średniowiecznej, transl. by J. Rybałt, Warszawa 1958.
Google Scholar
Grotius H., O prawie wojny i pokoju. Trzy księgi, w których znajdują wyjaśnienie prawo natury i prawo narodów, a także główne zasady prawa publicznego, vol. 1, transl. by R. Bierzanek, Warszawa 1957.
Google Scholar
Höffe O., Immanuel Kant, transl. by A.M. Kaniowski, Warszawa 1996.
Google Scholar
Jones J.W., Historical Introduction to the Theory of Law, Oxford 1940.
Google Scholar
Levy E., “Natural Law in Roman Thought”, Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris, vol. 15 (1949), pp. 1-23.
Google Scholar
Monahan A.P., From Personal Duties towards Personal Rights. Late Medieval and Early Modern Political Thought, 1300-1600, Montreal–Kingston 1994.
Google Scholar
McGrade A.S., “Ockham and the Birth of Individual Rights”, in B. Tierney, P. Linehan (eds.) Authority and Power. Studies on Medieval Law and Government Presented to Walter Ullmann on his Seventieth Birthday, Cambridge 1980.
Google Scholar
McGrade A.S., The Political Thought of William of Ockham. Personal and Institutional Principles, Cambridge 1974, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561238.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561238
Google Scholar
Monteskiusz, O duchu praw, transl. by T. Boy-Żeleński, Kraków 2016.
Google Scholar
Oakley F., “Medieval Theories of Natural Law. William of Ockham and the Significance of the Voluntarist Tradition”, Natural Law Forum, vol. 6 (1961), pp. 65-83, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/6.1.65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/6.1.65
Google Scholar
Oakley F., The Political Thought of Pierre d’Ailly. The Voluntarist Tradition, New Haven 1964.
Google Scholar
Paulus VI, Gaudium et spes, Romae 1965.
Google Scholar
Pinckaers S.T., Źródła moralności chrześcijańskiej. Jej metoda, treść, historia, transl. by A. Kuryś, Poznań 1994.
Google Scholar
Rand A., Cnota egoizmu. Nowa koncepcja egoizmu, transl. by J. Łoziński, Poznań 2015.
Google Scholar
Randi E., “A Scotist Way of Distinguishing between God’s Absolute and Ordained Powers”, in A. Hudson, M. Wilks (eds.), From Ockham to Wyclif, Oxford–New York 1987, pp. 43-50, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143045900000806.
Google Scholar
Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA 1971.
Google Scholar
Rawls J., Political Liberalism, New York 1993.
Google Scholar
Rommen H., Die ewige Wiederkehr des Naturrechts, München 1947.
Google Scholar
Szlachta B., “Aksjologia Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku. Perspektywa badacza myśli politycznej”, Przegląd Sejmowy, vol. 25, no. 6 (143) (2017), pp. 125-150.
Google Scholar
Tierney B., Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought. 1150-1650, Cambridge 1982, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558627.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558627
Google Scholar
Tomasz z Akwinu, Suma teologiczna, vol. 13, transl. by P. Bełch OP, Londyn 1986.
Google Scholar
Tuck R., Natural Rights Theories. Their Origin and Development, Cambridge 1979, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163569.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163569
Google Scholar
Villey M., “La genèse du droit subjectif chez Guillaume d’Occam”, Archives de Philosophie du Droit, vol. 9 (1964), pp. 97-127.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.