Can Memory and Truth Be Tailored by Law? Memory Law and the Right to the Truth in Rwanda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2023.86.16Keywords:
memory laws, Rwanda, right to the truth, reconciliation, genocideAbstract
The concept of memory laws has been gaining attention for the past few years. It is commonly defined as legal provisions governing history, including repressive measures against the denial of past crimes. Memory laws also include stateapprovedinterpretations of crucial historical events, the law establishing state holidays and commemoration of victims of past atrocities. The laws have a big part in transition and reconciliation, however, they may also lead to a distortion of historical truth. The main purpose of the paper is to analyse the coexistence between memory laws and the right to the truth in the context of human rights violations and international crimes. For that reason, firstly, the legal nature of the truth and memory under international law is evaluated. Secondly, the Rwandan legal provisions on genocide are analysed and comments are made on the elements of the Rwandan traditions concerning the past. That example serves to show the danger of the politicization of memory laws. Finally, the paper is an attempt to answer the question whether the conjunction of the right to the truth and memory laws is necessary.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Baranowska G., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., “‘Right to Truth’ and Memory Laws: General Rules and Practical Implications,” Polish Political Science Yearbook, vol. 47, no. 1 (2018), pp. 97-109, https://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018107
Google Scholar
Belavusau U., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., “The Remarkable Risk of ‘Law and Historical Memory’ in Europe: Theorizing Trends and Prospects in the Recent Literature,” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 47, no. 2 (2020), pp. 325-338, https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12228.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12228
Google Scholar
Berna M.B., “Argument in Favour of Identifying the Right to Truth as an Autonomous Prerogative within the General Theory of Human Rights,” Analele Universității Titu Maiorescu, vol. 31, no. 26 (2017), pp. 31-48.
Google Scholar
Bucholc M., “Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland after 2015,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 11 (2019), pp. 85-110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0080-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0080-7
Google Scholar
Buckley-Zistel S., “We Are Pretending Peace: Local Memory and the Absence of Social Transformation and Reconciliation in Rwanda”, in P. Clark, Z.D. Kaufman (eds), After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction, and Reconciliation in Rwanda and beyond, New York 2009, pp. 153-171.
Google Scholar
Clark J.N., “Judging the ICTY: Has It Achieved Its Objectives?,” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 9, no. 1-2 (2008), pp. 123-142, https://doi.org/10.1080/1468385090 2723454.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902723454
Google Scholar
Cohen S., States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering, Cambridge 2001.
Google Scholar
Dudai R., “Transitional Justice as Social Control: Political Transitions, Human Rights Norms and the Reclassification of the Past,” The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 69, no. 3 (2018), pp. 691-711, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12300.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12300
Google Scholar
Ferrer Mac-Gregor E., “The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right under the Interamerican Human Rights System,” Mexican Law Review, vol. 9, no. 1 (2016), pp. 121-139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.09.007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.09.007
Google Scholar
Grosswald Curran V., “History, Memory and Law,” Roger Williams University Law Review, vol. 16, no. 1 (2011), pp. 100-109.
Google Scholar
Gutman Y., “A Declaration of Memory War: The Symbolic Effect of Illiberal Memory Laws in a Comparative Perspective,” Mémories en jeu/Memories at Stake, vol. 9 (2019), pp. 72-76.
Google Scholar
Gutman Y., “Memory Laws: An Escalation in Minority Exclusion or a Testimony to the Limits of State Power?,” Law and Society Review, vol. 50, no. 3 (2016), pp. 575-607, https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12221.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12221
Google Scholar
Gutman Y., Tirosh N., “Balancing Atrocities and Forced Forgetting: Memory Laws as a Means of Social Control in Israel,” Law and Social Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 3 (2021), pp. 705-730, https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.35
Google Scholar
Haugbolle S., “Public and Private Memory of Lebanese Civil War,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, vol. 25, no. 1 (2005), pp. 191-203, https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-25-1-191.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-25-1-191
Google Scholar
Hinchman L.P., Hinchman S.K. (eds), “Introduction,” in Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences, Albany 1997, pp. 13-30.
Google Scholar
Hom S.K., Yamamoto E.K., “Collective Memory, History, and Social Justice,” UCLA Law Review, vol. 47, no. 6 (2000), pp. 1747-1802.
Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, Law and Reality: Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda, New York 2008.
Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda, New York 1999.
Google Scholar
Innes M., Understanding Social Control: Deviance, Crime and Social Order, Maidenhead 2003.
Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, “Commentary on Article 32 of Protocol I,” in Protocol Additional to the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflict. Commentary, Geneva 1987, p. 343.
Google Scholar
Jansen Y.-O.N., “Denying Genocide or Denying Free Speech? A Case Study of the Application of Rwanda’s Genocide Denial Laws,” Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, vol. 12, no. 2. (2014), pp. 191-213.
Google Scholar
Jereza V.L.B., “Burying ‘National Trauma’: Memory Laws and the Memory of the Marcos Regime,” Philippine Law Journal, vol. 93, no. 2 (2020), pp. 410-445.
Google Scholar
Kavuro C., “Gacaca Courts, Reconciliation and the Politics of Apology in Post-Genocide Rwanda,” South African Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 30, no. 1 (2017), pp. 38-71.
Google Scholar
Kovras I., Grassroots Activism and the Evolution of Transitional Justice: The Families of the Disappeared, Cambridge 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316711262.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316711262
Google Scholar
Lachowski T., „Prawo do prawdy podstawowym prawem człowieka? Refleksje na temat sprawiedliwości okresu przejściowego (transitional justice),” Zeszyty Analityczne Instytutu Badań nad Stosunkami Międzynarodowymi, vol. 1 (2013), pp. 1-19.
Google Scholar
Lambourne W., “Justice and Reconciliation: Postconflict Peacebuilding in Cambodia and Rwanda,” in M. Abu-Nimer (ed.), Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, Lanham 2001, pp. 311-338.
Google Scholar
Lemarchand R., “Genocide, Memory and Ethnic Reconciliation in Rwanda,” in S. Marysse, F. Reyntjens, S. Vandeginste (eds), L’Afrique des Grands Lacs: Annuaire 2006-2007, Paris 2006, pp. 21-30.
Google Scholar
Longman T., Rutagengwa T., “Memory, Identity, and Community in Rwanda,” in E. Stover, H.M. Weinstein (eds), My Neighbour, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge 2004, pp. 162-182, https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511720352.012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720352.012
Google Scholar
Mälksoo M., “‘Memory Must Be Defended’: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security,” Security Dialogue, vol. 46, no. 3 (2015), pp. 1-31, https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552549.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552549
Google Scholar
Mgbako C., “Ingando Solidarity Camps: Reconciliation and Political Indoctrination in Post-Genocide Rwanda Note,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, vol. 18 (2005), pp. 201-224.
Google Scholar
Molenaar A., Gacaca, Grassroots Justice After Genocide: The Key Reconciliation in Rwanda?, Leiden 2005.
Google Scholar
Muñoz-Rojas Oscarsson O., “Granite Remains: Francoist Monuments Today,” Public Art Dialogue, vol. 2, no. 2 (2012), pp. 147-157, https://doi.org/10.1080/21502552.2012.714541.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21502552.2012.714541
Google Scholar
“National Itorero Commission (Strategy),” at nic.gov.rw, https://www.nic.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/ ITORERO_POLICY.pdf.
Google Scholar
Nora P., “General Introduction: Between Memory and History,” in P. Nora, L.D. Kritzman (eds), Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past, vol. 1: Conflicts and Divisions, transl. by A. Goldhammer, New York 1993, pp. 1-20.
Google Scholar
Nowak M., UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, Kehl–Strassburg– Arington 2005.
Google Scholar
Ntampaka C., “Mémoire et réconciliation au Rwanda: écart entre les pratiques populaires et les actions de l’autorité,” Dialogue, vol. 226 (2002), pp. 3-33.
Google Scholar
Nuzov I., “Freedom of Symbolic Speech in the Context of Memory Wars in Eastern Europe,” Human Rights Law Review, vol. 19, no. 2 (2019), pp. 231-253, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngz008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngz008
Google Scholar
Palmer N., “Transfer or Transformation? A Review of the Rule 11 Bis Decisions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,” The African Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 20, no. 1 (2012), pp. 1-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2012.0018
Google Scholar
Pottier J., Re-Imagining Rwanda: Conflict, Survival and Disinformation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge 2002, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491092.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491092
Google Scholar
Richters A., Dekker C., de Jonge K., “Reconciliation in the Aftermath of Violent Conflict in Rwanda,” Intervention, vol. 3, no. 3. (2005), pp. 203-221.
Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza N., “Measures of Non-Repetition in Transitional Justice: The Missing Link?,” UC Hastings Research Paper, vol. 160 (2016), pp. 1-41, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2746226.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2746055
Google Scholar
Sierp A., History, Memory, and Trans-European Identity: Unifying Divisions, New York 2014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766973
Google Scholar
Staub E., Pearlman L.A., “Healing, Reconciliation, and Forgiving after Genocide and Other Collective Violence,” in E. Staub (ed.), The Psychology of Good and Evil: Why Children, Adults, and Groups Help and Harm Others, Cambridge 2003, pp. 432-450, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615795.037.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615795.037
Google Scholar
Steward P.J., Strathern A., Violence: Theory and Ethnography, London 2002.
Google Scholar
Sundaram A., Bad News: Last Journalists in a Dictatorship, New York 2016.
Google Scholar
Thomson S., “Re-Education for Reconciliation: Participant Observations on Ingando,” in S. Straus, L. Waldorf (eds), Remarking Rwanda: State Building and Human Rights after Mass Violence, Madison 2011, pp. 332-343.
Google Scholar
Thomson S., “Rwanda’s National Unity and Reconciliation Program,” E-International Relations, 1 May 2014, at https://www.e-ir.info/2014/05/01/rwandas-national-unity-and-reconciliation-program/.
Google Scholar
Tirosh N., Schejter A., “‘I Will Perpetuate Your Memory through All Generations’: Institutionalization of Collective Memory by Law in Israel,” International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, vol. 11, no. 1 (2015), pp. 21-35, https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.11.1.21_1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.11.1.21_1
Google Scholar
“Unity and Reconciliation Speech at Gisozi Genocide Memorial Centre,” Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, at http://www.victoire-ingabire.com/Eng/victoires-quotes/.
Google Scholar
Waldorf L., “Instrumentalizing Genocide: The RPF’s Campaign against ‘Genocide Ideology’,” in S. Straus, L. Waldorf (eds), Remarking Rwanda: State Building and Human Rights after Mass Violence, Madison 2011, pp. 48-67.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.