Can Memory and Truth Be Tailored by Law? Memory Law and the Right to the Truth in Rwanda

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2023.86.16

Keywords:

memory laws, Rwanda, right to the truth, reconciliation, genocide

Abstract

The concept of memory laws has been gaining attention for the past few years. It is commonly defined as legal provisions governing history, including repressive measures against the denial of past crimes. Memory laws also include stateapprovedinterpretations of crucial historical events, the law establishing state holidays and commemoration of victims of past atrocities. The laws have a big part in transition and reconciliation, however, they may also lead to a distortion of historical truth. The main purpose of the paper is to analyse the coexistence between memory laws and the right to the truth in the context of human rights violations and international crimes. For that reason, firstly, the legal nature of the truth and memory under international law is evaluated. Secondly, the Rwandan legal provisions on genocide are analysed and comments are made on the elements of the Rwandan traditions concerning the past. That example serves to show the danger of the politicization of memory laws. Finally, the paper is an attempt to answer the question whether the conjunction of the right to the truth and memory laws is necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Małgorzata Myl-Chojnacka, University of Silesia, Poland

Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Law and Administration, International Public Law and European Law, University of Silesia in Katowice. Research interests include international human rights law, international humanitarian law of armed conflicts and international criminal law. Dr Myl-Chojnacka has conducted research on direct and indirect victims of human rights violations and international crimes, eg. in Russia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Rwanda. She is the author of the monography: “Family members as victims of serious human rights violations. A study in international human rights law and international criminal law”. For her scientific work, she has been awarded by Silesian Scientific Award and scholarship of Casimir Pulaski Foundation.

References

Baranowska G., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., “‘Right to Truth’ and Memory Laws: General Rules and Practical Implications,” Polish Political Science Yearbook, vol. 47, no. 1 (2018), pp. 97-109, https://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018107.
Google Scholar

Belavusau U., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., “The Remarkable Risk of ‘Law and Historical Memory’ in Europe: Theorizing Trends and Prospects in the Recent Literature,” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 47, no. 2 (2020), pp. 325-338, https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12228.
Google Scholar

Berna M.B., “Argument in Favour of Identifying the Right to Truth as an Autonomous Prerogative within the General Theory of Human Rights,” Analele Universității Titu Maiorescu, vol. 31, no. 26 (2017), pp. 31-48.
Google Scholar

Bucholc M., “Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland after 2015,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 11 (2019), pp. 85-110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0080-7.
Google Scholar

Buckley-Zistel S., “We Are Pretending Peace: Local Memory and the Absence of Social Transformation and Reconciliation in Rwanda”, in P. Clark, Z.D. Kaufman (eds), After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction, and Reconciliation in Rwanda and beyond, New York 2009, pp. 153-171.
Google Scholar

Clark J.N., “Judging the ICTY: Has It Achieved Its Objectives?,” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 9, no. 1-2 (2008), pp. 123-142, https://doi.org/10.1080/1468385090 2723454.
Google Scholar

Cohen S., States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering, Cambridge 2001.
Google Scholar

Dudai R., “Transitional Justice as Social Control: Political Transitions, Human Rights Norms and the Reclassification of the Past,” The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 69, no. 3 (2018), pp. 691-711, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12300.
Google Scholar

Ferrer Mac-Gregor E., “The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right under the Interamerican Human Rights System,” Mexican Law Review, vol. 9, no. 1 (2016), pp. 121-139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.09.007.
Google Scholar

Grosswald Curran V., “History, Memory and Law,” Roger Williams University Law Review, vol. 16, no. 1 (2011), pp. 100-109.
Google Scholar

Gutman Y., “A Declaration of Memory War: The Symbolic Effect of Illiberal Memory Laws in a Comparative Perspective,” Mémories en jeu/Memories at Stake, vol. 9 (2019), pp. 72-76.
Google Scholar

Gutman Y., “Memory Laws: An Escalation in Minority Exclusion or a Testimony to the Limits of State Power?,” Law and Society Review, vol. 50, no. 3 (2016), pp. 575-607, https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12221.
Google Scholar

Gutman Y., Tirosh N., “Balancing Atrocities and Forced Forgetting: Memory Laws as a Means of Social Control in Israel,” Law and Social Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 3 (2021), pp. 705-730, https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.35.
Google Scholar

Haugbolle S., “Public and Private Memory of Lebanese Civil War,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, vol. 25, no. 1 (2005), pp. 191-203, https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-25-1-191.
Google Scholar

Hinchman L.P., Hinchman S.K. (eds), “Introduction,” in Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences, Albany 1997, pp. 13-30.
Google Scholar

Hom S.K., Yamamoto E.K., “Collective Memory, History, and Social Justice,” UCLA Law Review, vol. 47, no. 6 (2000), pp. 1747-1802.
Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, Law and Reality: Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda, New York 2008.
Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda, New York 1999.
Google Scholar

Innes M., Understanding Social Control: Deviance, Crime and Social Order, Maidenhead 2003.
Google Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross, “Commentary on Article 32 of Protocol I,” in Protocol Additional to the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflict. Commentary, Geneva 1987, p. 343.
Google Scholar

Jansen Y.-O.N., “Denying Genocide or Denying Free Speech? A Case Study of the Application of Rwanda’s Genocide Denial Laws,” Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, vol. 12, no. 2. (2014), pp. 191-213.
Google Scholar

Jereza V.L.B., “Burying ‘National Trauma’: Memory Laws and the Memory of the Marcos Regime,” Philippine Law Journal, vol. 93, no. 2 (2020), pp. 410-445.
Google Scholar

Kavuro C., “Gacaca Courts, Reconciliation and the Politics of Apology in Post-Genocide Rwanda,” South African Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 30, no. 1 (2017), pp. 38-71.
Google Scholar

Kovras I., Grassroots Activism and the Evolution of Transitional Justice: The Families of the Disappeared, Cambridge 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316711262.
Google Scholar

Lachowski T., „Prawo do prawdy podstawowym prawem człowieka? Refleksje na temat sprawiedliwości okresu przejściowego (transitional justice),” Zeszyty Analityczne Instytutu Badań nad Stosunkami Międzynarodowymi, vol. 1 (2013), pp. 1-19.
Google Scholar

Lambourne W., “Justice and Reconciliation: Postconflict Peacebuilding in Cambodia and Rwanda,” in M. Abu-Nimer (ed.), Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, Lanham 2001, pp. 311-338.
Google Scholar

Lemarchand R., “Genocide, Memory and Ethnic Reconciliation in Rwanda,” in S. Marysse, F. Reyntjens, S. Vandeginste (eds), L’Afrique des Grands Lacs: Annuaire 2006-2007, Paris 2006, pp. 21-30.
Google Scholar

Longman T., Rutagengwa T., “Memory, Identity, and Community in Rwanda,” in E. Stover, H.M. Weinstein (eds), My Neighbour, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge 2004, pp. 162-182, https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511720352.012.
Google Scholar

Mälksoo M., “‘Memory Must Be Defended’: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security,” Security Dialogue, vol. 46, no. 3 (2015), pp. 1-31, https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552549.
Google Scholar

Mgbako C., “Ingando Solidarity Camps: Reconciliation and Political Indoctrination in Post-Genocide Rwanda Note,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, vol. 18 (2005), pp. 201-224.
Google Scholar

Molenaar A., Gacaca, Grassroots Justice After Genocide: The Key Reconciliation in Rwanda?, Leiden 2005.
Google Scholar

Muñoz-Rojas Oscarsson O., “Granite Remains: Francoist Monuments Today,” Public Art Dialogue, vol. 2, no. 2 (2012), pp. 147-157, https://doi.org/10.1080/21502552.2012.714541.
Google Scholar

“National Itorero Commission (Strategy),” at nic.gov.rw, https://www.nic.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/ ITORERO_POLICY.pdf.
Google Scholar

Nora P., “General Introduction: Between Memory and History,” in P. Nora, L.D. Kritzman (eds), Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past, vol. 1: Conflicts and Divisions, transl. by A. Goldhammer, New York 1993, pp. 1-20.
Google Scholar

Nowak M., UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, Kehl–Strassburg– Arington 2005.
Google Scholar

Ntampaka C., “Mémoire et réconciliation au Rwanda: écart entre les pratiques populaires et les actions de l’autorité,” Dialogue, vol. 226 (2002), pp. 3-33.
Google Scholar

Nuzov I., “Freedom of Symbolic Speech in the Context of Memory Wars in Eastern Europe,” Human Rights Law Review, vol. 19, no. 2 (2019), pp. 231-253, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngz008.
Google Scholar

Palmer N., “Transfer or Transformation? A Review of the Rule 11 Bis Decisions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,” The African Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 20, no. 1 (2012), pp. 1-21.
Google Scholar

Pottier J., Re-Imagining Rwanda: Conflict, Survival and Disinformation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge 2002, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491092.
Google Scholar

Richters A., Dekker C., de Jonge K., “Reconciliation in the Aftermath of Violent Conflict in Rwanda,” Intervention, vol. 3, no. 3. (2005), pp. 203-221.
Google Scholar

Roht-Arriaza N., “Measures of Non-Repetition in Transitional Justice: The Missing Link?,” UC Hastings Research Paper, vol. 160 (2016), pp. 1-41, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2746226.
Google Scholar

Sierp A., History, Memory, and Trans-European Identity: Unifying Divisions, New York 2014.
Google Scholar

Staub E., Pearlman L.A., “Healing, Reconciliation, and Forgiving after Genocide and Other Collective Violence,” in E. Staub (ed.), The Psychology of Good and Evil: Why Children, Adults, and Groups Help and Harm Others, Cambridge 2003, pp. 432-450, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615795.037.
Google Scholar

Steward P.J., Strathern A., Violence: Theory and Ethnography, London 2002.
Google Scholar

Sundaram A., Bad News: Last Journalists in a Dictatorship, New York 2016.
Google Scholar

Thomson S., “Re-Education for Reconciliation: Participant Observations on Ingando,” in S. Straus, L. Waldorf (eds), Remarking Rwanda: State Building and Human Rights after Mass Violence, Madison 2011, pp. 332-343.
Google Scholar

Thomson S., “Rwanda’s National Unity and Reconciliation Program,” E-International Relations, 1 May 2014, at https://www.e-ir.info/2014/05/01/rwandas-national-unity-and-reconciliation-program/.
Google Scholar

Tirosh N., Schejter A., “‘I Will Perpetuate Your Memory through All Generations’: Institutionalization of Collective Memory by Law in Israel,” International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, vol. 11, no. 1 (2015), pp. 21-35, https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.11.1.21_1.
Google Scholar

“Unity and Reconciliation Speech at Gisozi Genocide Memorial Centre,” Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, at http://www.victoire-ingabire.com/Eng/victoires-quotes/.
Google Scholar

Waldorf L., “Instrumentalizing Genocide: The RPF’s Campaign against ‘Genocide Ideology’,” in S. Straus, L. Waldorf (eds), Remarking Rwanda: State Building and Human Rights after Mass Violence, Madison 2011, pp. 48-67.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-12-03

How to Cite

Myl-Chojnacka, Małgorzata. 2023. “Can Memory and Truth Be Tailored by Law? Memory Law and the Right to the Truth in Rwanda”. Politeja 20 (5(86):343-59. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2023.86.16.

Issue

Section

Zagadnienia polityczne i prawne